Far-rightists on this site?

[VioletVortex]

Of course there should be. Far right doctrines are political systems just like any other. The main issue would revolve around the legality of such things in authoritarian pacifist countries like France; having such subforums could put users in those countries at risk.

I used to consider myself a Nazi, despite being in line with Ghandi on the Political Compass. I still have Eurocentric views, but I am certainly not far-right. That said, if we have subforums for the discussion of far left ideas then it would make sense to have similar subgroups for far right ideas.

 

[Corvus]

Are there any far-rightists on this site such as neo-Fascists, right-wing nationalists (especially ethnic nationalists), national anarchists, revolutionary conservatives, traditionalists (particularly of Evola's Traditionalist School), European New Rightists, etc.?

I hope so. I find these political ideologies fascinating if extremely unsuitable for the vision of our collective future, that I have. They are entirely diametrically opposed to what would be my ideal political system. Which would dissolve all nation states and allow free trade and movement over the entire planet. After resolving the main problem of inequitable global wealth and resource distribution using measures such as neutering the predatory mutli nationals, like Shell or Monsanto, and regulating tightly banks that increase debt and prevent progress and development.

 

[gnomon]

I changed my vote to yes.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

I voted no, but to be fair, I would have voted no for other non-religious forums we have in place too.

 

[Desert Snake]

Voting yes for entertainment.

 

[Weeping Raven]

I would describe myself as a Nationalist and have views that most on here would more than likely find disagreeable, so of course I voted yes .

 

[The_Fisher_King]

Are there any far-rightists on this site such as neo-Fascists, right-wing nationalists (especially ethnic nationalists), national anarchists, revolutionary conservatives, traditionalists (particularly of Evola's Traditionalist School), European New Rightists, etc.?

I know RF skews leftist with some mainstream conservatives and religious fundamentalists thrown in but what about those on the "extremes" of the right? Should there be political boards for them? We have communist and socialist subforums but no nationalist subforum, for instance. Is there any interest in these? I would be interested in talking more about these things in a civil manner. The European New Right (like Alain de Benoist) is pretty intriguing to me, for example.

What are your thoughts?

I voted yes. Any progress on this front?

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

I voted yes. Any progress on this front?

Sadly not. I doubt there will be.

 

[The_Fisher_King]

Sadly not. I doubt there will be.

It was looking that way from the back and forth with yer man among the mods, sadly, as you say , but I thought I'd ask.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

It was looking that way from the back and forth with yer man among the mods, sadly, as you say , but I thought I'd ask.

Indeed. This site is far too leftist at the moment for such things. Now we have the outrage over Charlottesville, which certainly will not help. There are a number of far-rightists on this site, though. Maybe if more join.

 

[Mister Silver]

I'm a dirty leftist libertarian, but I see no reason why those on the far right shouldn't have their own section in which to post. I voted yes.

 

[The_Fisher_King]

Indeed. This site is far too leftist at the moment for such things. Now we have the outrage over Charlottesville, which certainly will not help. There are a number of far-rightists on this site, though. Maybe if more join.

How many of us are there, do you think?

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

How many of us are there, do you think?

That actually post? Probably around 10 or a dozen. More than there are communists.

 

[The_Fisher_King]

That actually post? Probably around 10 or a dozen. More than there are communists.

Glad to hear it!

 

[Alea iacta est]

Calling Fascism etc right-wing is an oxymoron. Fascism and Nazism are just two different branches of the same tree as Communism. Originally either Communism nor Fascism were racist, just Nazism. Mussolini even criticized Hitler about the racist and antisemitic views. Mussolini's mistress was even Jewish.

I don't have any problems with having a nationalist DIR. A real nationalist recognize nationalists from other ethnic groups. Or else they are hypocrites.

Nationalism as a term is usually used wrongly. The average American who loves his/her country is not a nationalist but a patriot. But if the average German/Russian/Japanese love their countries, they are nationalists if they want their people to have their own country. But if they have an open idea of anyone become like them, like anyone can become a part of their nation, like anyone can become an American regardless of ancestry, they are not nationalists but patriots. Nationalism is always based on ethnic groups. Sometimes they term Cultural Nationalism is being used, but that is just another word for patriotism.

Personally I think that nationalism can be good as long as the nationalist movements believe in democracy and freedom of speech.

 

[Tomyris]

Fascism is not communism. It is founded predominantly in the poetic-philosophical work of D'Annunzio and the traditionalist revitalisation of the French agrarian right in the age of laicitism in the Third Republic when the monarchists, split between four contenders, ceased to capture the voice of the traditionalist right.

The problem with the conservative forum is that it explicitly defines conservative economics as classical liberal economics, and as a adherent of perennialism and a traditionalist, I am a Physiocrat and completely opposed to classical liberal economics.