Far-rightists on this site?

[Saint Frankenstein]

Are there any far-rightists on this site such as neo-Fascists, right-wing nationalists (especially ethnic nationalists), national anarchists, revolutionary conservatives, traditionalists (particularly of Evola's Traditionalist School), European New Rightists, etc.?

I know RF skews leftist with some mainstream conservatives and religious fundamentalists thrown in but what about those on the "extremes" of the right? Should there be political boards for them? We have communist and socialist subforums but no nationalist subforum, for instance. Is there any interest in these? I would be interested in talking more about these things in a civil manner. The European New Right (like Alain de Benoist) is pretty intriguing to me, for example.

What are your thoughts?

 

[Rival]

I was just going to make a thread asking if anyone knew of any socially conservative fora like this forum.

Then you posed.

It's, like, fate bruv.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

I was just going to make a thread asking if anyone knew of any socially conservative fora like this forum.

Then you posed.

It's, like, fate bruv.

Go for it! I'd like to know of good conservative forums, too. Great minds think alike.

 

[YmirGF]

Far right? How bleeding edge are we talking? Alt-Right-wackos? There is already a Conservative Only forum, why have another that virtually no one will use?

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Far right? How bleeding edge are we talking? Alt-Right-wackos?

Why should Marxists be allowed but not the Alt Right? I'm sure you're aware of the damage Marxism has done to the world and continues to do. As long as they keep it civil and don't resort to 4chan crap, I don't see what the problem is.

As for me, I've always been interested in far-right stuff. I used to have interesting conversations with neo-Nazis and white nationalists on other forums. I might just have an inner Fascist within myself, but there are constructive conversations to be had. I like variety. There's a huge amount if interesting and worthy viewpoints all over the political spectrum. If you don't like it, you're welcome not to take part.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Nothing to say, @YmirGF? Well, okay.

 

[YmirGF]

Nothing to say, @YmirGF? Well, okay.

More at a loss for words, really, Frankie.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

More at a loss for words, really, Frankie.

Fair enough. Lol.

 

[Revoltingest]

"Right" can mean many things.....
- Capitalist on the economic spectrum
- Authoritarian
- Religous fundamentalism
- _________________________
- Some combination of the above

Need a precise definition or a better term.

 

[Flame]

I don't see why not. Like you pointed out, Frank, we already have a few far left DIRs.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

"Right" can mean many things.....
- Capitalist on the economic spectrum
- Authoritarian
- Religous fundamentalism
- _________________________
- Some combination of the above

Need a precise definition or a better term.

There's already a capitalist subforum and most of the ideologies I named are anti-capitalist. As for religion, religious fundies wouldn't be welcomed in many of the ones I named, especially of the Abrahamic variety.

 

[Nakosis]

What are your thoughts?

Who would sign up for it? If you feel you need such a forum to express your views it's ok with me. I just wonder how active it would be.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Who would sign up for it? If you feel you need such a forum to express your views it's ok with me. I just wonder how active it would be.

@Rival and I would be there. Maybe a couple of others. Some more might be hanging out in the shadows.

 

[Revoltingest]

There's already a capitalist subforum and most of the ideologies I named are anti-capitalist. As for religion, religious fundies wouldn't be welcomed in many of the ones I named, especially of the Abrahamic variety.

This says what it's not, but not what it is.
Description by apophosis?

It seems to be authoritarian, both economically & socially.

 

[Debater Slayer]

The staff discussed the idea of a nationalist forum a while back and decided not to create said forum. The main reason was that having nationalists from different countries in the same forum could cause too much argumentation and heat for a discussion forum.

We have the Conservative Only section, but if there's enough demand for another right-wing section of a specific type, the staff could discuss the idea as well.

It's safe to say that a forum explicitly for fascism is almost surely out of the question, though.

 

[Revoltingest]

It's safe to say that a forum explicitly for fascism is almost surely out of the question, though.

Why?

 

[Rival]

I think the problem is the definition of these words is so loose as to be meaningless. I identify as socially conservative but economically liberal. This puts me almost literally nowhere. I could theoretically post in the Communism/Socialism area but I doubt very much my socially conservative views would be very welcome there. Just like my leftist economic views would not be welcome in the Conservative area, or my socially conservative views in the Liberal area.

 

[Nakosis]

@Rival and I would be there. Maybe a couple of others. Some more might be hanging out in the shadows.

Sorry, I just saw Rival's thread.
I see myself as a fiscal conservative, probably social liberal. I suppose I see social conservatives as more the fundamental religionist group. Social morality based on God's laws. Ten commandment, Sharia law etc... Is that wrong?

 

[Revoltingest]

I think the problem is the definition of these words is so loose as to be meaningless. I identify as socially conservative but economically liberal. This puts me almost literally nowhere. I could theoretically post in the Communism/Socialism area but I doubt very much my socially conservative views would be very welcome there. Just like my leftist economic views would not be welcome in the Conservative area, or my socially conservative views in the Liberal area.

Clearly stated.
I hereby declare you "alibertarian".
"Unlibertarian" would work too.

 

[Debater Slayer]

Why?

A forum specifically made for an ideology that has a significant portion of racism and supremacism built in by definition would violate RF's mission statement.