• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Fallen once, now risen.

MonkeyFire

Well-Known Member
Knowledge rebelled when God gave his angelic nominalizations Free Will. Existence fell when satan began, but the angel of Existence had been perfect in Heaven for an eternity before. All Things got infected with a few things, by virtue of synymosity, Omniscience, the angel of light, was further burning.

But, if Faith believes in Lucifer long enough he finds out he was perfect, safe, and passive all by nature. As well, we came to find that satan is naught nor nothing, and he can not infect Existence, All, Things, or Omniscience. In the Quran YHWH doesn't give free will and there are no fallen angels.
 
Last edited:

David T

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
This is not-even-sense.
And that is the entertaining and illuminating aspect of religious forums!!! Sort of like people talking about the multiverse scientifically as if its fact!!! Or astrology or even evolution!!!
 

David T

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
And that is the entertaining and illuminating aspect of religious forums!!! Sort of like people talking about the multiverse scientifically as if its fact!!! Or astrology or even evolution S if they are magically independent of the topic or discussing consciousness for that matter!!!
 

Tumah

Veteran Member
Sustain of gtfo.
How does one substantiate their inability to derive understanding from a post? You wrote it intending to be cryptic and you were very, very successful.

And don't you think its odd to ask me to prove myself after an OP suffering from a decided lack of proof texts?
 

MonkeyFire

Well-Known Member
How does one substantiate their inability to derive understanding from a post? You wrote it intending to be cryptic and you were very, very successful.

And don't you think its odd to ask me to prove myself after an OP suffering from a decided lack of proof texts?

Its your own incoherency.
 

Tumah

Veteran Member
Knowledge [an intangible concept] rebelled when God gave his angelic nominalizations [things that were converted into nouns] Free Will. Existence [apparently that includes everything besides for the concept of falling] fell [there it is]when satan began [to use sentence fragments as independent clauses together with comma splicing], but the angel of Existence had been perfect in Heaven for an eternity before [aside for that nasty non-sequitur habit s/he/it had]. All Things got infected with a few things [namely, crypticness and ambiguity], by virtue of synymosity [or to use English words, 'they're being synonymous], Omniscience, the angel of light [which may or may not be one thing but is definitely suffering from said-whosity], was further burning.

But, if Faith [this otherwise incomprehensible sentence makes sense because it has capitalized nouns] believes in Lucifer long enough he finds out he was perfect, safe, and passive all by nature [monseigneurs Faith or Lucifer?]. As well, we [who's 'we' white man?] came to find that satan is naught nor nothing [nor is he naught no thing of nothing naughted], and he can not infect Existence, All, Things, or Omniscience [none of which apparently includes the others]. In the Quran YHWH doesn't give free will and there are no fallen angels [thankfully though, this OP does give free non-sequiturs, otherwise you'd not have known that].

Its your own incoherency.
Yes, you are right.
 
Top