• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Everything MUST be 1.

Balthazzar

Christian Evolutionist
Our universe is mostly mass, with mass that not exactly based on a binary. We can make anti-mass in the lab, but our universe did to end up with this binary. Our universe is dominated by mass; much more mass than anti-mass. This unity of mass defines the unidirectional inertia of the universe; where all the laws of the universe are heading. If mass and anti-mass were equal the universe would be stuck.

Another interesting example of a unity, that is assumed to be a binary, is the magnetic field. A magnetic field appears to be separated into opposites poles; north and south. Yet science has never seen an isolated monopole; north or south, that is as enduring, as the magnet. The two poles only exist as a spinoff from the one; magnetic field. Only the one is self standing. The two are more of an intellectual illusion, that dates back to the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which assumes a binary universe of opposites.

Male and female differ by an entire chromosome. On paper, looking at just these two chromosomes, they're not opposites; mirror images. Most of the human DNA is the same; unity. The brain creates that illusion based on long standing cultural expectations. It turns out male and female can do all the same things, except for one. Why model based on the exception, instead of the rule?

This binary illusion of the brain, has over assumed the binary nature of nature. This has led to the oppression of women; the oppressor and the oppressed are opposites. Yet male and female have more in common; unity, than what is opposite; binary. The ancients saw this and attributed this illusion factor to the Binarius; Satan.

Another good example in science is the electron. Particle colliders, at the highest energy, have not been able to split the electron. The electron is considered an elementary particle.

The electron has mass and negative charge. It is still assumed to be binary, even though it is a single elementary particle. This is due to the binary tradition. If we have thing, made of two things; like the poles of the magnetic, that cannot be divided into two self standing things, it is really a unity.


The positron, which has mass and positive charge, is also an elementary particle. These are not as common as the electron, and tend to merge with even higher mass via the proton, which is not an elementary particle.

Mass and negative charge which are one interchangeable thing within the electron, are more than likely based on an aspect of the unified force; mass/charge can merge as one interchangeable thing. Science cannot get past its illusion of the binary, to see this unity. This unity is how you can solve the unified field theory, within our matter dominant universe. Mass and negative charge are one phase, via the electron. The Satan subroutine makes it hard to see, with Atheists having no-good way to clear their heads and re-calibrate.

The nucleus of atoms? I see the lefts and rights, the darks and lights, the solids and vapors and then also the spaces in-between. Protons and neutrons and electrons differ but all belong to the nucleus, so the implication is of function, like the body and each differing part (component) having a specific duty or role. It's still a whole unit within infinite whole units as an infinite whole. Correct?
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Our universe is mostly mass, with mass that not exactly based on a binary. We can make anti-mass in the lab, but our universe did to end up with this binary. Our universe is dominated by mass; much more mass than anti-mass. This unity of mass defines the unidirectional inertia of the universe; where all the laws of the universe are heading. If mass and anti-mass were equal the universe would be stuck.

Another interesting example of a unity, that is assumed to be a binary, is the magnetic field. A magnetic field appears to be separated into opposites poles; north and south. Yet science has never seen an isolated monopole; north or south, that is as enduring, as the magnet. The two poles only exist as a spinoff from the one; magnetic field. Only the one is self standing. The two are more of an intellectual illusion, that dates back to the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which assumes a binary universe of opposites.

Male and female differ by an entire chromosome. On paper, looking at just these two chromosomes, they're not opposites; mirror images. Most of the human DNA is the same; unity. The brain creates that illusion based on long standing cultural expectations. It turns out male and female can do all the same things, except for one. Why model based on the exception, instead of the rule?

This binary illusion of the brain, has over assumed the binary nature of nature. This has led to the oppression of women; the oppressor and the oppressed are opposites. Yet male and female have more in common; unity, than what is opposite; binary. The ancients saw this and attributed this illusion factor to the Binarius; Satan.

Another good example in science is the electron. Particle colliders, at the highest energy, have not been able to split the electron. The electron is considered an elementary particle.

The electron has mass and negative charge. It is still assumed to be binary, even though it is a single elementary particle. This is due to the binary tradition. If we have thing, made of two things; like the poles of the magnetic, that cannot be divided into two self standing things, it is really a unity.

The positron, which has mass and positive charge, is also an elementary particle. These are not as common as the electron, and tend to merge with even higher mass via the proton, which is not an elementary particle.

Mass and negative charge which are one interchangeable thing within the electron, are more than likely based on an aspect of the unified force; mass/charge can merge as one interchangeable thing. Science cannot get past its illusion of the binary, to see this unity. This unity is how you can solve the unified field theory, within our matter dominant universe. Mass and negative charge are one phase, via the electron. The Satan subroutine makes it hard to see, with Atheists having no-good way to clear their heads and re-calibrate.
But what is the actual substance that creates, or is responsible for, the mass of the universe?
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member
Our universe is mostly mass, with mass that not exactly based on a binary.
I think our universe is mostly energy, if I'm not mistaken. Folks who know more physics/cosmology, feel free to correct me.

The Satan subroutine makes it hard to see, with Atheists having no-good way to clear their heads and re-calibrate.

This really came out of nowhere.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Another good example in science is the electron. Particle colliders, at the highest energy, have not been able to split the electron. The electron is considered an elementary particle.

The electron has mass and negative charge. It is still assumed to be binary, even though it is a single elementary particle. This is due to the binary tradition. If we have thing, made of two things; like the poles of the magnetic, that cannot be divided into two self standing things, it is really a unity.

The positron, which has mass and positive charge, is also an elementary particle. These are not as common as the electron, and tend to merge with even higher mass via the proton, which is not an elementary particle.
The electron is the complimentary opposite of the positron, a binary particle pair, but when they unite, they each revert to the underlying EM energy they are formed of as gamma radiation. So an electron is not a solid particle. The electron in the quantum world is seen as part wave and part particle, collapse the wave form and it becomes a particle.
 

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
The electron is the complimentary opposite of the positron, a binary particle pair, but when they unite, they each revert to the underlying EM energy they are formed of as gamma radiation. So an electron is not a solid particle. The electron in the quantum world is seen as part wave and part particle, collapse the wave form and it becomes a particle.

The mass of the electron is the particle; momentum, while the negative charge expresses the wave; electromagnetic. Since we cannot isolate the one without the other, in particle accelerators; the electron is an elementary particle, the wave/particle is more of a binary illusion, like the two monopoles of the magnet.

Science still wants to classify the one thing, as two, even though it cannot make the one electron into two separate things. The two parts of the electron tend to stay on pairs like north and south. This tendency to separate into two, stems from the tree of knowledge of good and evil tradition, that make one expect 2 and not look at the electron as 1.

The positron is the anti-particle of the electron. However, in our universe, it does not exist in the same proportions. This is a fact of nature. If they did exist in the same proportions, they would have annihilated to form energy, and we could not have any permanent matter. They needed to be different, so the electron could persist in larger amounts, as the bridge between mass and negative charge. The positron appears to more stable when combined with the larger mass of the proton. But the proton is not an elementary particle. A positron can be released with beta decay.

The electron unifies gravity with the EM force, due to the implied unity of mass and negative charge; it is one thing. One way to see this is to consider gravitational pressure and how material phases will change as a function of pressure and temperature. This change of state implies unique electron balances of mass and charge, within the different phases. For example, at extreme pressure and temperature, water will become a metal, with electrons acting differently than in liquid water.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
The mass of the electron is the particle; momentum, while the negative charge expresses the wave; electromagnetic. Since we cannot isolate the one without the other, in particle accelerators; the electron is an elementary particle, the wave/particle is more of a binary illusion, like the two monopoles of the magnet.

Science still wants to classify the one thing, as two, even though it cannot make the one electron into two separate things. The two parts of the electron tend to stay on pairs like north and south. This tendency to separate into two, stems from the tree of knowledge of good and evil tradition, that make one expect 2 and not look at the electron as 1.

The positron is the anti-particle of the electron. However, in our universe, it does not exist in the same proportions. This is a fact of nature. If they did exist in the same proportions, they would have annihilated to form energy, and we could not have any permanent matter. They needed to be different, so the electron could persist in larger amounts, as the bridge between mass and negative charge. The positron appears to more stable when combined with the larger mass of the proton. But the proton is not an elementary particle. A positron can be released with beta decay.

The electron unifies gravity with the EM force, due to the implied unity of mass and negative charge; it is one thing. One way to see this is to consider gravitational pressure and how material phases will change as a function of pressure and temperature. This change of state implies unique electron balances of mass and charge, within the different phases. For example, at extreme pressure and temperature, water will become a metal, with electrons acting differently than in liquid water.
But if the electron particle can be transformed into pure electromagnetic radiation at gamma ray wavelength, it is obviously comprised of this energy. Perhaps the electron is a spherical standing wave of some portion of quantum vacuum energy. Wrt positrons, I have read that the quantum vacuum has many virtual positrons, which btw are attracted to the electron and are the cause of inertia.
 
Top