1. Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Earth-orbit technology?

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by Mock Turtle, Nov 26, 2022.

  1. Mock Turtle

    Mock Turtle Choose an appropriate meaning.
    Premium Member

    Feb 17, 2018
    Agnostic and with strong irreligious convictions.
    Esa mulls Solaris plan to beam solar energy from space

    "Our team of scientists have found no technical show-stoppers to prevent us from having space-based solar power," he said.

    Is there no issue from all the space debris and other stuff possibly damaging such structures? Given that the larger the object in space, the more likely it might be hit by space debris or similar. Even the Webb space telescope has already been hit and damaged by micrometeorites, and this isn't even in close orbit around the Earth. Should we wait until we have good defences against such issues?
  2. Stevicus

    Stevicus Veteran Member
    Premium Member

    Sep 26, 2011
    What they could do is build a giant space dumpster, then have a space shuttle with a giant magnet go around and collect all the space debris in orbit and put it in the dumpster. Then, they can send the dumpster to Mars to be used later as scrap metal when constructing our Mars colonies in the future.
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
  3. HonestJoe

    HonestJoe Well-Known Member

    Aug 16, 2010
    It is a very real issue but it wouldn't be significantly different for a larger structure given that there is a lot of space (even just in that orbital region) so this would still be tiny in the grand scheme of things. So, they'd be able to use a lot of the same techniques to reduce the risk and potential impact.

    Large debris fields are tracked and so steps can be taken if they're due to intersect an orbit (turning fragile elements away, closing covers etc.) and the general design would account for resistance to such strikes (protecting exposed elements, including redundancy to mitigate failures etc.). Also, any long-term infrastructure would need and have routine maintenance flights, so any damaged elements could be repaired or replaced, regardless of the cause. So, as the quote suggests, while being one of many important aspects for them to consider, as could even shift the cost-benefit balance beyond viability, it wouldn't be an automatic show-stopper.
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1