wellwisher
Well-Known Member
This topic was something I was developing a few years ago. I am not sure if this the correct place to put. It is OK to move it.
In essence, this topic is about the role that dogs played in the progression of the pre-human mind, leading to language, civilization, and even advanced behavior like religion. Thus the title Dog is God spelled backwards. Did dogs lead humans to God; awareness?
Domestication of dogs is assumed to have occurred about 14,000 years ago, based on fossil evidence. It is reasonable to assume that humans and dogs coexisted many years before domestication. Before domestication, each species would have retained more of their original instinctive nature and independence as a species. The value of coexistence, is the pre-humans of paradise, would have been able to learn useful skills from another apex species, that was not part of their instinct natures as descendants of apes. The result would be a blend of instinctive repression and epigenetic changes, leading to better adaptation and different mental energy.
If you compare ape and wolf behavior, both are apex species. Both are omnivores. Apes are more slanted toward the vegetarian side of omnivore, while dogs are more slanted to the carnivore side of omnivore. This simple difference, if copied by the early pre-humans would increase the protein diet of pre-humans. This will increase brain size.
Dogs are natural migratory predators and would have done well during the end of the ice age. They had skills to teach the pre-humans in terms of hunting and survival. Dogs burrow; cave animal. They can also drive out bears from caves so their pre-human pack mates could survive.
Another difference has to do with social order and structure. Apes tend to be set up as patriarchs, led by the larger males. Dogs are led by the needs of the team, which allows room for lead roles for females. The word *****, which is a female dog, is connected to a dominance behavior of females toward the males, such as during dating and mating. The females can be leaders of the pack. Early matriarchies, in terms of human development, is not ape behavior, but is closer to the dogs. Patriarchs, which come later, is back to ape.
Both dogs and apes are intelligent animals. What is more unique to dogs is the ability to do jobs. The herding dog, which would have been important early, has to be able to learn and translate intent between three or more species of animals, with or without language. At the same time, they have to figure out how to do this without a lot of supervision. There are not many seeing eye apes, protection apes, hunter apes. Job skill ethics would be essential for civilization, with dogs setting an early example by their natures. Apes are more contemplative instead of blue color. It appears dogs led humans to water, but there was a return to ape; dog becomes God; Adam.
Adam is not biology changes in the DNA but appears to reflect epigenetic change via learning.
In essence, this topic is about the role that dogs played in the progression of the pre-human mind, leading to language, civilization, and even advanced behavior like religion. Thus the title Dog is God spelled backwards. Did dogs lead humans to God; awareness?
Domestication of dogs is assumed to have occurred about 14,000 years ago, based on fossil evidence. It is reasonable to assume that humans and dogs coexisted many years before domestication. Before domestication, each species would have retained more of their original instinctive nature and independence as a species. The value of coexistence, is the pre-humans of paradise, would have been able to learn useful skills from another apex species, that was not part of their instinct natures as descendants of apes. The result would be a blend of instinctive repression and epigenetic changes, leading to better adaptation and different mental energy.
If you compare ape and wolf behavior, both are apex species. Both are omnivores. Apes are more slanted toward the vegetarian side of omnivore, while dogs are more slanted to the carnivore side of omnivore. This simple difference, if copied by the early pre-humans would increase the protein diet of pre-humans. This will increase brain size.
Dogs are natural migratory predators and would have done well during the end of the ice age. They had skills to teach the pre-humans in terms of hunting and survival. Dogs burrow; cave animal. They can also drive out bears from caves so their pre-human pack mates could survive.
Another difference has to do with social order and structure. Apes tend to be set up as patriarchs, led by the larger males. Dogs are led by the needs of the team, which allows room for lead roles for females. The word *****, which is a female dog, is connected to a dominance behavior of females toward the males, such as during dating and mating. The females can be leaders of the pack. Early matriarchies, in terms of human development, is not ape behavior, but is closer to the dogs. Patriarchs, which come later, is back to ape.
Both dogs and apes are intelligent animals. What is more unique to dogs is the ability to do jobs. The herding dog, which would have been important early, has to be able to learn and translate intent between three or more species of animals, with or without language. At the same time, they have to figure out how to do this without a lot of supervision. There are not many seeing eye apes, protection apes, hunter apes. Job skill ethics would be essential for civilization, with dogs setting an early example by their natures. Apes are more contemplative instead of blue color. It appears dogs led humans to water, but there was a return to ape; dog becomes God; Adam.
Adam is not biology changes in the DNA but appears to reflect epigenetic change via learning.
