• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Does Gay Porn Destroy the Sanctity of Traditional Porn?

Curious George

Curious George

Veteran Member
Sunstone said:
Lately, I've become concerned that gay porn might be destroying the sanctity of my traditional, straight porn. Should I be alarmed? Why or why not?
Click to expand...

Are you suggesting that female on female porn has created a niche whereby good old fashioned gay-hating men-folk must acquiesce to gay sex or be forced to admit that they do enjoy looking at penises?

Or are you questioning how people buying straight porn are forced to quasi-support shelf space in porn stores around the world where gay porn located?

In either situation, I think their is little cause for alarm. You can always pretend that you are too righteous to look at porn in the first place(no one is likely to find that stash- or the few man-on-man tapes within said stash- unless you leave the tape in the betamax again). :p
 
Shermana

Shermana

Heretic
Koldo said:
There is no porn more sacred than lesbian porn, and everyone should know that by now.
Click to expand...

I have to agree.

And I agree with Curious George, if I understand him right.

I don't see why "Traditional Porn" is not considered "gay". I mean, I have to wonder why these "straight" people like looking at a naked dude. I don't care if he's with a girl. There's still a dude in the picture. Pretty gay no matter what in my book. The only possible way a heterosexual dude can consider himself such when it comes to porn is if it's all girls.
 
Gjallarhorn

Gjallarhorn

N'yog-Sothep
Shermana said:
I have to agree.

And I agree with Curious George, if I understand him right.

I don't see why "Traditional Porn" is not considered "gay". I mean, I have to wonder why these "straight" people like looking at a naked dude. I don't care if he's with a girl. There's still a dude in the picture. Pretty gay no matter what in my book. The only possible way a heterosexual dude can consider himself such when it comes to porn is if it's all girls.
Click to expand...

We now arrive at the conclusion that penises are inherently gay/sinful. :yes:

Eunuchs anyone?
 
Rick O'Shez

Rick O'Shez

Irishman bouncing off walls
Sunstone said:
Lately, I've become concerned that gay porn might be destroying the sanctity of my traditional, straight porn. Should I be alarmed?
Click to expand...

Oh it's definitely undermining traditional values, the 1950s were much better, people don't whether they're coming or going these days. :p
 
Uberpod

Uberpod

Active Member
Sunstone said:
Lately, I've become concerned that gay porn might be destroying the sanctity of my traditional, straight porn. Should I be alarmed? Why or why not?
Click to expand...
There is no such thing as real gay porn even if it is legal. Porn has always been straight for centuries. Porn is the union of one man and his computer.
 
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Uberpod said:
There is no such thing as real gay porn even if it is legal. Porn has always been straight for centuries. Porn is the union of one man and his computer.
Click to expand...
Picture this hot one with her top removed!
How-to-Properly-Remove-Dust-From-Your-Computer-Case-4-600x400.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top