Ow, right, sorry.
Just went back through the conversation and you replied to a post of mine which was a reply to someone else, who actually said it. My bad. I didn't notice and thought I was still talking to the person that said that...
I simply disagree. I think you are completely stretching it and going out of your way to "interpret" it in a way that fits current scientific knowledge. People of every generation do this.
What's funny to me, is that such "re-interpretation" always only happens after science comes with a new breakthrough.
It's like, science has theory A and then folks like you go "ow, my prefered scripture said that all along!!"
Then a generation later science disproves A and comes up with B. Then new guys like you are like "ow, my prefered scripture said THAT all along! My parents were just reading it wrong".
But never is it the other way round. Never does some guy read his "amazing" scriptures and derives from that a scientific breakthrough. You know?
It's a clear tell.
There's an extremely blatant example of this behaviour on youtube, from 2 muslim street preachers trying to school PZ Meyrs. They were telling him about the "amazing scientific miraculous knowledge" in the quran concerning embryology. The funny part is that PZ is an embryologist.
So they said "the quran says that first this forms and then that forms and then last in line that forms".
PZ: "that's wrong. in reality, it all forms simultanously"
The muslim: "OW but the quran is still right, because it uses the word <some arabic word> wich can mean BOTH sequential AND simultanously!!!!!"
PZ: ".....uhu......."
That off course doesn't say anything about you. But it illustrates what I'm saying here.
I'm not at all impressed by such "ad hoc" re-interpretation of vague ambigous texts to force fit current scientific knowledge into it...
If you want to impress me with "scientific knowledge" in your scripture, then come up with something using your scripture that isn't already known by science and which is then confirmed by science.
Humans have always asked, did Jesus arise from the dead, as a human being.
Then science reading science data has science data......actualized by human scientists, as descriptions of changes to gases and the fusion of planet Earth.
Which is 2 varied statements in one detailed historic review.
Therefore as you have to be a living human, in natural self presence, then do not give self away...which you do as a scientist.
You talk as if you do not exist.
Now I would wonder at your consciousness and idealize that science talks about its own human death in the DATA about a cell existing and then not existing.
For if a cell did not exist, then to a human studier it would mean, so you are deceased.
Yet in science you actually do not relate that form of thinking to self...being one of the biggest mistakes a human owns in the sciences.
Therefore if you read scientific journals as medical testimonials about self...a long time ago the human DNA of a male self, a Father was mutated and removed out of Genetics because he did UFO pyramid radiation science.
The theme history and visionary information says the pyramid was used to de materialize form, inside of its machination...what it was built for...to remove form.
The same as what science does today. Why science in vision told me that the nuclear power plant model is an updated version of the pyramid that caused by a non interactive cooling method life to be nuked in Nature.....as a fact of history.
So DNA says miraculously the same male reappeared in life...a miracle.
As the story/theme Jesus...for it is real.....it was like his own Father of the past was reborn...so you would ask how could that be possible.
For dinosaurs are and were a mutation that lived and died by atmospheric circumstance.
ICE as medically stated every year in December a MIRACLE. The HOLY BABY DNA life returned.
What the medical journals documented.
Which would come to a situation where humans ask, did a human named Jesus actually die. When he was living liquid, chemicals, oils and cell losses his stigmata...so his body was oozing liquids quite a lot. As seen in modern irradiation attacks also.
Therefore humans say, no medical documents of the old claim he was oozing liquid out of his body, had to have been dead. Really!
He had been oozing liquids the whole time as evidence in his FORUMS for public speaking against radiation science.
So he did not die.
Medical journals said he was being crucified on the cross of wood.....Russia forest flattened...burning bush history, UFO landing on the ground is the medical accounting.
Science in olden times used very different science language and symbolism to what you use today.
Science said that the gas/spirit inside of the stone mass, entombed Saints he said, meaning of which is ZERO or AIN held/formed stone gases got removed as evidence...said it went missing. Was their science version of you made SINK HOLES.
Exactly as it was stated in old science symbolism.
Now you have to ask a male human scientist....male self do you not own a personal human being male problem of thinking about natural states..giving it a name and then claim HE/HIM/HIS as a male scientist?
The answer is, of course I did.
You were the spirit entombed in stone?
No....yet He identifies that males as a brotherhood had agreed upon those terms....that is why.
Today science says I changed my male he, him and his claim to being stone, for I reasoned what a true idiot I was in the past....the ONLY reason why science change its male science symbolism.
So please excuse my female self for trying to bring your male science self to his own self conclusions...….you were not telling the truth about stone/planet and self.
All you personally own in God medical status is a skeleton bones like stone when you are deceased.
That actual claim the bones men said, to be God you have to be a skeleton...so do you want to be DEAD?
How it was rationalized.
Therefore if you say the spirit of a human is miraculous in its recovery against attack, then surely it proved that it is.
