Epic Beard Man
Bearded Philosopher
The soul is not incorporeal - it is a part of the materiel world and gives rise to consciousness, as an emergent property of soul plus brain
Interesting....
From a metaphysical/theological standpoint the soul is a finite substance. If it gives rise to consciousness through the medium of the brain then it must share the same properties as the brain/consciousness.
It is incorporeal yet through some mystery it interacts with the physical
That means in some way or at least in part, the soul although incorporeal, shares some finite qualities, and if so would affect the definition of it being infinite.
3) The distinction between mental and physical is a human construct that doesn't necessarily reflect reality
There lies in the problem of duality. How do I or can I perceive my soul from my mind? Or in your case how does one draw the distinction between sentience and a soul if mental and physical doesn’t necessarily reflect reality?
For further clarification how does my mind perceive an animal to have a soul on the basis of sentience when sentience and soul are two separate things? How am I confident enough to make that distinction when in reality an animal that behaves and interacts with the world could be the result of purely its organ (i.e brain)?
Not trying to give you a hard time remember I’m playing devil’s advocate here