Did you know this is who you were voting for?

[james dixon]

Trump does not know the difference between realty and fiction. He has played the fiction role model for so long this has become his reality, in the real world.

That’s fine, maybe even great for an “actor” but please folks, is this the image we want for the President of the USA?

Trump truly believes he is the guy in the link below---

Check this out, the actor becomes President!!
trump's tv shows - Google Search




Did you know this is who you were voting for?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Trump does not know the difference between realty and fiction. He has played the fiction role model for so long this has become his reality, in the real world.

That’s fine, maybe even great for an “actor” but please folks, is this the image we want for the President of the USA?

Trump truly believes he is the guy in the link below---

Check this out, the actor becomes President!!

https://tinyurl.com/ychnz827



Did you know this is who you were voting for?

Your link does not work. I was curious, I did not vote for Trump, but was interested in what you had.

 

[james dixon]

trump's tv shows - Google Search

 

[Buddha Dharma]

I didn't vote for Trump. I think those that did were much more interested in his nationalistic message than anything else he might have said.

American nationalism is of the toxic kind.

 

[Revoltingest]

The worst risk I saw with Trump was the same kind
of risk I saw for the other, ie, starting a new war.
We're seeing useful, albeit far from perfect income
tax reform, & some regulatory improvements.
So far, the war risk has not been realized, so I wouldn't
change my vote. This could change at any time.

 

[Shaul]

As bad as Trump is Hillary would have been far worse.

 

[Kenny]

Hillary IMO would have been worse. I voted for the Supreme Court and got it.

 

[Flame]

Considering I didn't vote, I wouldn't change a thing.

 

[james dixon]

As bad as Trump is Hillary would have been far worse.

I am sure mentally ill folks who want to buy guns agree with you

 

[Shaul]

I am sure mentally ill folks who want to buy guns agree with you

Why would you write that? It is still just as restricted for them to get guns now. In fact it is somewhat more restricted since the mentally ill among the illegal immigrants can’t get guns as freely. Also Trump won’t be selling guns to mentally ill criminals like Obama did with the fast and furious program.

 

[Mindmaster]

Trump does not know the difference between realty and fiction. He has played the fiction role model for so long this has become his reality, in the real world.
***snip***
Did you know this is who you were voting for?

A year after the election, it speaks more of the people incessantly whining than anything Trump is doing. I completely reject identity politics, so no matter what Trump personally did (so long as it wasn't obviously ridiculously crazy) I probably would have still voted for him. If you take identity politics away from the Democrats, it really leaves you nothing to vote for. That's not Trump's fault, it's theirs - it's a weak position that takes mind numbing stupidity to the next level.

 

[taykair]

Considering I didn't vote, I wouldn't change a thing.

I'm with you. The last time I voted in a Presidential election was in 1992 - which also happened to be the last full year that an adult sat in the Oval Office. Only silly kids since then.

(Don't get excited, folks. Only an opinion.)

 

[james dixon]

Trump will be impeached in 2018

 

[LuisDantas]

It is amazing that there are people saying outright that Hillary would be worse.

Heck, it is amazing that he made it this far without being impeached.

 

[Revoltingest]

It is amazing that there are people saying outright that Hillary would be worse.

Heck, it is amazing that he made it this far without being impeached.

It's amazing that you think so highly of her.
What would you impeach Trump for?

 

[LuisDantas]

It's amazing that you think so highly of her.

You misread me. I hardly even have an opinion on her.

What would you impeach Trump for?

At this point, obstruction of Justice. Although there may be a better case for patent incompetence for the role, which I would personally consider a "high misdemeanor" were I a member of the House. Collusion would probably fit as well.

 

[Revoltingest]

You misread me. I hardly even have an opinion on her.

Au contraire!
You judge her to be less dangerous than Trump.

At this point, obstruction of Justice. Although there may be a better case for patent incompetence for the role, which I would personally consider a "high misdemeanor" were I a member of the House. Collusion would probably fit as well.

Evidence?
Charges should be accompanied with that.

 

[LuisDantas]

Au contraire!
You judge her to be less dangerous than Trump.

That is just another way of saying the same thing, don't you think?

Evidence?
Charges should be accompanied with that.

Eh. Are you serious?

 

[Revoltingest]

That is just another way of saying the same thing, don't you think?

This isn't clear.
But it still seems that you're judging Hillary to be the lesser evil.
We disagree on that.

Are you serious?

Yes.
Filing charges without evidence would be reckless in the extreme

 

[LuisDantas]

This isn't clear.
But it still seems that you're judging Hillary to be the lesser evil.

You betcha.

We disagree on that.

We certainly do, if you are serious.

Yes.
Filing charges without evidence would be reckless in the extreme

Oh, it sure would.