Did Trump you post on youtube?

[Subduction Zone]

Didn't your school teacher always tell you to double check your work?

Not to the point of insanity. The signatures were checked. At best they might find a few errors at this point. They won't find anything significant making is a waste of a time.

 

[shunyadragon]

Didn't your school teacher always tell you to double check your work?

Didn't your school teacher always tell you to double check your sources? Do you realize that all states follow the current laws concerning the procedures for counting, auditing, and paper recounts. Based on current laws the signature envelope is removed, the signature is checked, registration to vote is checked, and separated from the ballot to protect the confidentiality of the voter. By law the audits, and paper recounts do not include checking signatures. If you do bot like the way the laws and regulations that determine the procedures change the laws.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Didn't your school teacher always tell you to double check your sources? Do you realize that all states follow the current laws concerning the procedures for counting, auditing, and paper recounts. Based on current laws the signature envelope is removed, the signature is checked, registration to vote is checked, and separated from the ballot to protect the confidentiality of the voter. By law the audits, and paper recounts do not include checking signatures. If you do bot like the way the laws and regulations that determine the procedures change the laws.

I think at this point the strategy of the Trump supporters is to attempt to delay and to foster false ideas of cheating. Those in charge have to know that there is not any evidence for cheating by now.

 

[Ponder This]

You asked about believing Trump. I do not believe Trump any more than beleive Putin.



As far as I am concerned nothing, but ALL the states abided by the current laws. It is you that is complaining about the current laws. So what's up????



Recounts do not look at signatures, because that is how the laws and regulations for elections are written. By the present laws and regulations the signatures are checked and voter eligibility is determined when the ballots are counted, and they are separated from the ballot. Audits and paper ballots are for verifying the count THAT IS THE LAW.

[qotee] Why do you keep talking about changing laws? Not that I'm opposed to making better laws if the current ones are insufficient, but isn't it the point (according to Trump) that there are places where process was not entirely legal?
If there were fraudulent signatures, then by law, the corresponding ballots should not have been counted. Do you disagree?

The current laws make no allowance for checking signatures in audits and paper recounts. ALL states have followed current laws and regulations. It is you that have a problem as to how the elections are confirmed based on current laws.



The previous election was based on the current laws and regulations WITHOUT an allowance to check signatures in audits and paper recounts. Why is there a problem now with the laws and regulations in this election?

You're the on citing the good site that described the laws and regulations for audits and recounts, and there is no allowance for checking signatures in audits and recounts as described. What is your problem unless you want to change the laws?[/QUOTE]

If you think there is a problem with the current laws, then it is possible to change them for the future.
But in the video Trump posted, it looks like he is more interested in proving the current laws were broken.
A discrepancy in the signatures would show some ballots were not legal. It's fine for you to claim that they were legal. Your claim doesn't make laws change.