Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I disagree. See
- Israel's Ethnogenesis: Settlement, Interaction, Expansion and Resistance -- Av
No problem. I can understand how it looks that way, I am simply fighting fire with fire. And I agree. Knowledge of the solar system was not important to them and the works were poetic not scientific. I still have respect for Christianity, the problem is that literalists make the entire belief system, both Christian and Judaism, look ridiculous if one insists upon a literal interpretation of the Bible.I have no idea whether @Hockeycowboy is a literalist or not. (Note his signature.) My problem is with cheap attempts at bible-bashing that rely on taking potshots at the most primitive and vulnerable interpretation of the text. I apologize if that was not your intent.
FWIW: I seriously doubt that the author of Deutero-Isaiah knew the first thing about the solar system or cared. As for myself, you would be hard pressed to find a literalist among the ranks of Reform, Conservative, and Reconstructionist Judaism and Torahs such as the Plaut Commentary (Reform) and Etz Hayim (Conservative) are quite open about and comfortable with the traces of Near Eastern mythology found in the texts.