Spam, wonderful spam (bloody vikings!)
So are you saying Atman is devoid of bliss and that bliss is only the intrinsic quality of anandamaya sheath??
And that whoever experiences this blissfull anandamaya sheath in meditation experiences bliss (moksha)??
And that one can never actually experience Atman, but one can always realize the 'bliss' of the blissful anandamaya sheath instead??
Is this what you're saying??
If Atman/turiya is pure consciousness, then presumably bliss is something known to Atman/turiya, an object of experience.
There is also the question of how we interpret "satchitananda". Is it the experience of "being" Brahman?