To be clear, the first aspect shows there is complexity.
The second aspect shows parts don't have individual purpose outside the system (alternative purpose).
This might like look it suffices, but what are Morpheus of one system to another, until you get to a whole different system. This allows x component to have relationship with x component of a previous system for a different reason that was linked to a system that morphed into that system.
So this why I introduced 3. It has to be a system that itself is so different then any potential system, that there is no transition face where it keeps morphing to morphing.
The eye fails 3 as far I'm aware of. That's why it doesn't work. But what if something fundamentally is so different that there is nothing similar to it as a system nor just by it's binary nature, can you trace footprint of possible change of one system to the next.
In the case of the eye, it starts with this small detecting thing that is so abstract, and you eventually get to the eye.
It was literally the worse example to come up with.
I am thinking of an example, I guess, I will get into detail why I think there is one thing in nature as a system that is like this.
But I'm trying to see if people acknowledge these 3 facts formed together prove it.
3 is hard to imagine, because there is of course infinite possible design of the system, and it can vary, and out of all those possibilities, there can't be anything like it to transition to it and so I can only think of one example at the moment of this.
And I will get into It in detail.