• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Denial by non-Muslims of the Qur'an's commands to commit violence.

WonderingWorrier

Active Member
Look , i can tell you what the book teaches , but perspective is another thing..
I would agree on that with you.
You have told me things the book says, you have not told me what it teaches.

Like I asked you before about clarifying your saying the Holy Spirit is the sword:
Besides this one verse are there any other direct connections which might possibly verify that the Holy Spirit is in fact the sword?
You did not clarify it.

But the bible in it's full message condemns that

Matthew 7:12
"...So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets."

I think this verse is simple but with deep wisdom.
What is the full message. How is it condemned.

Will you consider the wisdom of the bible message saying eye for eye, tooth for tooth. Some might think that is a good thing to do.

"And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done, so shall it be done to him; Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again". Leviticus.

It clearly says to do to others as they would do to you.
 

Dimi95

Active Member
You have told me things the book says, you have not told me what it teaches.

Like I asked you before about clarifying your saying the Holy Spirit is the sword:

You did not clarify it.

What is the full message. How is it condemned.

Will you consider the wisdom of the bible message saying eye for eye, tooth for tooth. Some might think that is a good thing to do.

"And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done, so shall it be done to him; Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again". Leviticus.

It clearly says to do to others as they would do to you.

Yes , as previously you have seen in the verses i showed you that the Sword of the Spirit = Word of God

And this is also shown when Jesus was tempted by Satan

Matthew Chapter 4:1-11
"Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil.After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry.The tempter came to him and said, "If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread."
Jesus answered, "It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God."Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple.“If you are the Son of God,” he said, “throw yourself down. For it is written:
“He will command his angels concerning you,and they will lift you up in their hands,so that you will not strike your foot against a stone."
Jesus answered him : It is also written - ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’
Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor.“All this I will give you,” he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.”
Jesus said to him, “Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.’”
Then the devil left him, and angels came and attended him.


Matthew 5:38-48
"You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles.Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.
You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
 

WonderingWorrier

Active Member
Yes , as previously you have seen in the verses i showed you that the Sword of the Spirit = Word of God
There are many different words in the bible. Sword is one of them. If you go to the beginning of the bible it speaks of the sword of Eden in Genesis.


And this is also shown when Jesus was tempted by Satan

Matthew Chapter 4:1-11
"Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil
I will show you something.
What you are showing me is evidence that the Holy Spirit is in fact the sword.
Because it says the Spirit leads into the Wilderness to be tempted by the devil. That is information which shows clear connections of the Holy Spirit to the sword.

The Holy spirit is the sword, because it leads into the wilderness.

Because sword is the same as wilderness. There is a clear connection between the Holy Spirit, the Sword, and the Wilderness.

Spear - Sword - Bow
Desert - Wilderness - Mountain


The sword being the wilderness in violent ways:
We gat our bread with the peril of our lives because of the sword of the wilderness. Lamentations.

And in peaceful ways:
Thus saith the Lord, The people which were left of the sword found grace in the wilderness; even Israel, when I went to cause him to rest. Jeremiah

I mentioned to you about the sword of Eden and the serpent in Eden back in post 369. So I agree with the verse you show. The Holy Spirit leads into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil.

That is why the Holy Spirit is the sword. Because of its connections to Eden.
 

Dimi95

Active Member
There are many different words in the bible. Sword is one of them. If you go to the beginning of the bible it speaks of the sword of Eden in Genesis.



I will show you something.
What you are showing me is evidence that the Holy Spirit is in fact the sword.
Because it says the Spirit leads into the Wilderness to be tempted by the devil. That is information which shows clear connections of the Holy Spirit to the sword.

The Holy spirit is the sword, because it leads into the wilderness.

Because sword is the same as wilderness. There is a clear connection between the Holy Spirit, the Sword, and the Wilderness.

Spear - Sword - Bow
Desert - Wilderness - Mountain


The sword being the wilderness in violent ways:
We gat our bread with the peril of our lives because of the sword of the wilderness. Lamentations.

And in peaceful ways:
Thus saith the Lord, The people which were left of the sword found grace in the wilderness; even Israel, when I went to cause him to rest. Jeremiah

I mentioned to you about the sword of Eden and the serpent in Eden back in post 369. So I agree with the verse you show. The Holy Spirit leads into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil.

That is why the Holy Spirit is the sword. Because of its connections to Eden.
No, this is the Word of God

John 1:1-5
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning.Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind.The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world.He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him.He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him.Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God—children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth."

So , no , it's not any word.

We get our bread with the peril of our lives(propter gladium in deserto, sive planol) This seems to refer to the time of the siege when they privately went out of the city to get in some provision, but went in danger of their lives.
because of … sword of … wildernes
because of the liability to attack by the robber Arabs of the wilderness, through which the Jews had to pass to get "bread" from Egypt (compare La 5:6)
The enemies lay encamped in all the plains, so as they could stir out no way but the sword of the Chaldeans was upon them, and what victuals they got they adventured their lives for, during the time of the siege.
According to the Bible, a flaming sword (Hebrew: להט החרב lahat chereb or literally "flame of the whirling sword" Hebrew: להט החרב המתהפכת lahaṭ haḥereb hammithappeket) was entrusted to the cherubim by God to guard the gates of Paradise after Adam and Eve were banished (Genesis 3:24).

So no , it's not the way you clarify it.
 
Last edited:

WonderingWorrier

Active Member
So no , it's not the way you clarify it.

I am saying the sword of the wilderness is the sword of Eden. Was I not clear?
Does this help further clarify what Im saying:

The Wilderness is as Eden:
For the Lord shall comfort Zion: he will comfort all her waste places; and he will make her wilderness like Eden, and her desert like the garden of the Lord; joy and gladness shall be found therein, thanksgiving, and the voice of melody. Isaiah.

The Oil tree is planted in the Wilderness:
I will plant in the wilderness the cedar, the ****tah tree, and the myrtle, and the oil tree; I will set in the desert the fir tree, and the pine, and the box tree together: Isaiah

The Oil is as the Sword:
The words of his mouth were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart: his words were softer than oil, yet were they drawn swords. Psalm.

Spear - Sword - Bow
Desert - Wilderness - Mountain
Bread - Oil - Wine

Therefore the sword of the wilderness is the sword of Eden. The oil is verifying it.

Is that any clearer?
 

Dimi95

Active Member
I am saying the sword of the wilderness is the sword of Eden. Was I not clear?
Does this help further clarify what Im saying:

The Wilderness is as Eden:
For the Lord shall comfort Zion: he will comfort all her waste places; and he will make her wilderness like Eden, and her desert like the garden of the Lord; joy and gladness shall be found therein, thanksgiving, and the voice of melody. Isaiah.

Deuteronomy 32:10
...In a desert land He found him, in a barren and howling waste. He shielded him and cared for him; he guarded him as the apple of his eye.”
Trust Him in your wilderness!

So metaphorically he is saying that he will replace the wilderness with the Garden of Eden.
For example , i will make your basement like garden.

Many Biblical characters spent time in the wilderness. The first two are Moses and the Israelites (40 years), and Jesus.But Job and Joseph also..
I will forget John , how could i ? :)
And the list continues..
There are a types of wilderness mentioned in the Bible.It can mean a land without water, a wasteland, or an area of wild fields but not used for living.

So the Garden of Eden is oposite of the wilderness.

The Oil tree is planted in the Wilderness:
I will plant in the wilderness the cedar, the ****tah tree, and the myrtle, and the oil tree; I will set in the desert the fir tree, and the pine, and the box tree together: Isaiah


I think this will help to understand the oil tree.

The planting of the Oil in the wilderness is caused by God to have effect and change on the wilderness.
If you belive in reason , you will understand this.
For example , i will put a candle in a dark room.It will give light , wright?


The Oil is as the Sword:
The words of his mouth were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart: his words were softer than oil, yet were they drawn swords. Psalm.
I would like to hear your opinion of the verse , how you see it and i will answer it.
 
Last edited:

WonderingWorrier

Active Member
So the Garden of Eden is oposite of the wilderness.
No. You showed me the Holy Spirit leads into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil, I have agreed with that verse and I have shown you Wilderness/Eden connections.

So here is another. This verse says the same thing in two ways: bow in wilderness, lick the dust.

They that dwell in the wilderness shall bow before him; and his enemies shall lick the dust. Psalm.

Because wilderness is dust.

Desert - Wilderness - Mountain
Spear - Sword - Bow
Straw - Dust - Stubble

So just as the wilderness is the sword, the dust is also the sword.

"Who raised up the righteous man from the east, called him to his foot, gave the nations before him, and made him rule over kings? he gave them as the dust to his sword, and as driven stubble to his bow. Isaiah".


There is the serpent in Eden. The serpent is connected to dust. The dust is verifying the Wilderness/Eden connection.

And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: Genesis.


I think this will help to understand the oil tree.

The planting of the Oil in the wilderness is caused by God to have effect and change on the wilderness.
If you belive in reason , you will understand this.

Every word has its place. If you believe in logic and reason, you will understand this.



I would like to hear your opinion of the verse , how you see it and i will answer it.
I hear being as oil, is also being as swords.

I see it like this. Look closely at the bones:

As he clothed himself with cursing like as with his garment, so let it come into his bowels like water, and like oil into his bones. Psalm

As with a sword in my bones, mine enemies reproach me; while they say daily unto me, Where is thy God? Psalm.


Bread - Oil - Wine
Spear - Sword - Bow
Flesh - Bone - Blood


The bones are verifying the oil is as sword.


Does this help further clarify what I am saying? The wilderness is Eden.
 

Dimi95

Active Member
@WonderingWorrier
1.The Wilderness is as Eden:
For the Lord shall comfort Zion: he will comfort all her waste places; and he will make her wilderness like Eden, and her desert like the garden of the Lord; joy and gladness shall be found therein, thanksgiving, and the voice of melody. Isaiah.

Sword of wilderness≠Sword of Eden

He compares the words as oposites , look at kontext!

2.Jesus is the Word of God , so he himself is a sword also.
Matthew Chapter 4:1-11
"Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil.After fasting forty days and forty nights, he was hungry.The tempter came to him and said, "If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread."
Jesus answered, "It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God."Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple.“If you are the Son of God,” he said, “throw yourself down. For it is written:
“He will command his angels concerning you,and they will lift you up in their hands,so that you will not strike your foot against a stone."
Jesus answered him : It is also written - ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’
Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor.“All this I will give you,” he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.”
Jesus said to him, “Away from me, Satan! For it is written: ‘Worship the Lord your God, and serve him only.’
Then the devil left him, and angels came and attended him.

I don't see anywhere here that Jesus is using the sword as weapon of evil.
In fact , Jesus never used violence in his ministry.
Also , everyrhing that comes from his mouth is a sword, i have shown you with the Book of Revelation.

3.I wanted to explain dust , but AGAIN you are ignoring kontext as i see.

Your pattern is false!
 

Dimi95

Active Member
I will show you an example of what you do,maybe you'll get it this way.

Miracle of 19 in the Quran

Bible Version
Twelve baskets remained after the 5,000 were fed by Jesus
Seven baskets remained after the 4,000 were fed by Jesus

So i can say that the remeining baskets of what he gave is the evidence of the Miracle.So that is 19

How do you respond to this?
 

WonderingWorrier

Active Member
Your pattern is false!

Please consider this.
If the sun is the bow, and the moon is the spear. Then by default the sword is the stars. That is logical.

Look here: The stars and the sword are not mentioned.
The sun and moon stood still in their habitation: at the light of thine arrows they went, and at the shining of thy glittering spear. Habakkuk.

Spear - Sword - Bow
Moon
- Star - Sun


Simply by considering these three things:
There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory. Corinthians.

And these three things:
Therefore set I in the lower places behind the wall, and on the higher places, I even set the people after their families with their swords, their spears, and their bows. Nehemiah



So considering the sword being as star, and in Revelation it states the stars being as figs.
And the Figs are connected to Eden as Adam and Eve wore fig leaves in Eden.

Therefore the stars and the figs are also verifying exactly the same pattern that I am showing you about the sword and Eden.

Does that further clarify what I have said?
 

Dimi95

Active Member
Does that further clarify what I have said?
Look , like our last discussion , you are not geting my point , and as i understand your intention , please try to understand mine.

What you wan't to say with your pattern , it leads back to the crazy staff and Muhhamad , and i get that.

You are trying to find truth in potential pattern with possibility of violent effect.
And i see the source in the verse with The Parable of Light , wright?

So i am arguing the way you present the pattern , and the content of it by simpy saying to you there are other ways of valuating,different from your understanding.
By that i mean :

Romans 13:3-5
"For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience."

How i understand this verse?
We should obey the laws of our country to both avoid punishment and to have a clean conscience. The government's purpose is to punish evil, not good. There's no real reason for us to fear our government if we obey the law, for rulers are not a cause of fear for good.

And also :
Romans 10:14-15
"How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe in the one of whom they have not heard? And how can they hear without someone preaching to them? And how can they preach unless they are sent? As it is written, "How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!"

So this is Christian way of seeing things , and that's also different way.

And you can argue that by just quoting what i have bolded above.
I understand that also.

But what is truth? How do we get to truth ?
"Declaring that something is true for one person, but not for another, is to claim that the truth is relative to or dependent on the subject being considered. Therefore, there is no universal truth applicable to all men, making the judgment of others futile. Thus, the endgame of this phrase becomes quite clear."

Let me show you an example of what i mean.
A glass contains 50 % water.
A pessimist is a person who considers the glass half full; an optimist considers the glass half empty. A realist drinks the water and knows that both explenations are correct in each way.
But what about the pesimist and optimist, what's the point there?
So , for example, someone with pessimism may look at a rainy day and think of how it has ruined their plans or how miserable they will be when they get wet. Someone with optimism would look at the same rainy day and think of how the water will be good for the nature.
It comes to a point where you have to make a risk to go one way.
You can stay in neutral line , but life has it's ups and downs.
And my reason for arguing like this is the orign of Islam and the difference between the historical and Islamic Muhhamad.
First , Quran is more about techical view of life,Christianity is more about spiritual.

We don't belive that one is just a number
We belive in more then that
The fact or state of being three in one.

Let me show you an example:
Three seperate structures of nitrate.
One molecule of nitrate is all three resident structure all the time , and never just one of them, the three are separate , but all the same, and they are one , they are three in one.
Just the way of thinking that God can't be in this state is a contradiction to God's nature and power.
Advice : Be more focused on the state , not on the number if you wan't to understand this.

The point is that i have a reason to even argue the way of saying things like this.
First step is to hear what history says , and history says more about Muhhamad then Islam.
So when someone says Islam is the Last Word of God i don't look at it because it's written so , I value Last differently,so for me is the one to prove to be the Last.
And we have different criteria sadly..

So some will say that Islam is the fastest growing religion on Earth , but i can argue that just by saying "yes, but biologically".But when you look at convertion , Christianity has more then double of the numbers and increasing.
Convertion is not so predictable as biologicall explenation.
In fact , convertion can have effect on the biologicall explanation , so that claim is not so strong anymore.

It's hard to stand at that neutral point and to argue reason.

Just because you define things like you defined , doesn't mean that it is used like that.
Sword is a weapon and you can use it to do harm with it , but Sword is also an object used for Fencing.


I am just showing you the effects of another view.
You benefit just by thinking like this.

Just because Hitler tought he was doing good and just because he had favorable opinions towards Christianity , doesn't mean that he was a Christian.
The sixth commandment forbids direct and intentional killing as gravely sinful.
Love fullfills all the commamdments , love does not deny them.
I can show you a verse that confirms this.

There is a big difference when you compare Hitler with Christianity.
I can also bark and say that i am a dog , but am i?

So when Jesus spoke like this and i look back at the Old Testament i say to myself : Wait , wait , what?

Gospel of John 10
"The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep."

Psalm 23:1-3
"The Lord is my shepherd, I lack nothing.He makes me lie down in green pastures,he leads me beside quiet waters,he refreshes my soul.
He guides me along the right paths for his name’s sake."

Muslims belive in the Zabur wright?

So , yes i will agree with you that there are crazy staff out there :)

If you don't understand how i argue your point , we can't go further.
 
Last edited:

WonderingWorrier

Active Member
Let me show you an example of what i mean.
A glass contains 50 % water.
A pessimist is a person who considers the glass half full; an optimist considers the glass half empty. A realist drinks the water and knows that both explenations are correct in each way.
I think people would have said that the other way around. I could assume you are mistaken but I could just ask "why would an optimist consider the glass half empty?". Because you might have good reason to think differently. Just like the person in your example who is unhappy about the rain might have good reason. But I see you change when talking about the rain so it seems you were mistaken.

I see the glass as both half full and half empty. Does saying that fit me in the box that you have made.
I do like that saying about 50/50 perspective, I thought it is also half full of air, and half empty of air.

But a glass that is half empty of air might sound crazy to you because it doesnt sound like your glass of water.


You are trying to find truth in potential pattern with possibility of violent effect.
And i see the source in the verse with The Parable of Light , wright?

The Parable of Light in the Quran is very specific saying the Star being as Olive Oil. If you were listening to what i have been saying about the sword then you would know the significance of that connection.
 

Dimi95

Active Member
The Parable of Light in the Quran is very specific saying the Star being as Olive Oil. If you were listening to what i have been saying about the sword then you would know the significance of that connection.
But i can also quote verses from the Bible to argue this verse.
I can argue the sword consistenly , and your claim would not be so strong anymore.
So i can use the Bible to opose the Quran just as you are doing.
Infinite regression , nothing more..
I know that you are finding comfort in neutral zone , but you can't be on that position forever.
We are having a decent discussion here and you don't value anything as evidence.
Nothing i give you.
I try to be understandable , but the discussion can't go only one way.
 
Last edited:

WonderingWorrier

Active Member
But i can also quote verses from the Bible to argue this verse.
I can argue the sword consistenly , and your claim would not be so strong anymore.
Then please show me rather than just talking around an answer.
You will have to do better than your fencing example to change the meaning of sword to your explanation.
A childs toy sword which made of foam is still connected to a real sword and what it does.

So you have to show me how you disconnect the meaning of sword and attach it to something else which sounds opposite. You have to show me how you make that leap in logic from sword to good. So far you have been unable to explain it in a clear way that I can comprehend.

But maybe I just dont understand the small percentage that are the True Christians who know the true meaning of the bible. Because you know the true meaning and others are wrong. I understand other Christians might feel the same way as you, but you can judge others and say who is a real Christian and who isnt. Is that the point that you are trying to make. The sword is good because you said so.
 

Dimi95

Active Member
I think people would have said that the other way around.
I will call now on what you said about how you see things.

Again with the Miracle of 19

Genesis 3:1
"Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?"

19 words - the Miracle of 19
Count them please.

In the Name of God the Merciful, the Compassionate - was that also part of 19 wright? bismillah ar-rahman ar-rahim; wright?

How many times in a day are Muslims told to say this word ?

But , let me tell you something my friend , the serpent will strike back at this , the serpent is smart,she doesn't like this , let's say if this is the serpent.

The serpent will say , but this was first written in Hebrew

Ok let's suppose that there is a different number of words(i leave it for you to check).

Then the serpent will say : that's not true.

Ok , so let's get into meaning of Hebrew words of this verse.

1.kî- means Because

2.’ā-mar
What does Mar mean in Hebrew?
bitter, bitterness of
bitter, bitterness. of water or food. of harlot's end, end of wickedness, cry


3.ĕ-lō-hîm,
The word elohim or 'elohiym (ʼĕlôhîym) is a grammatically plural noun for "gods" or "deities" or various other words in Biblical Hebrew. In Hebrew, the ending -im normally indicates a masculine plural.

4.lō
What is the meaning of Lo in the Bible?
interjection. look,see

5.ṯō-ḵə-lū,
What does the Hebrew word Akhal mean?
to eat, devour.

6.mik-kōl
The masculine noun כל (kol), meaning all or the whole.

7.‘êṣ
ates, a concrete noun meaning, “tree, wood, gallows;”

8.The Hebrew noun גן (gan) means "garden"

Ok , so the serpent makes this a little bit complicated , we have different possibilities , but if i would seek for the real intention of the serpent i would seek it here.

So i try to change the serpent's deception with actual statement.
To present her at the highest evil

Because bitter Gods look to eat the whole tree of the garden.

-And here you see the serpent's evil towards human kind.That's how the serpent sees us.That's why she decived Eve.

Here we can see the deception as precise intention.

But the serpent will say : Humans said this , not me,just as Eve said in the actual Fall.

So i have also a good reason when i see staff like this :

Sahih Muslim 146 , Book 1, Hadith 280
"Verily Islam started as something strange and it would again revert (to its old position) of being strange just as it started, and it would recede between the two mosques just as the serpent crawls back into its hole."

To understand how i got to this , you must think out of the box , because i even exclude how the words will be gramatically correct in a sentence.

Let's see another view of the Fall - backwards , but only backwards when the serpent and Eve are talking.
A backward movement or look is in the direction that your back is facing. Some people use backwards for this meaning.
And i use backward in this example for meaning in life.

So let's eliminate the part with the deception because when the intention is showned there is no deception.
Backward speech in the conversation between Eve and the serpent.

So if Eve started the conversation first that will be like this :

"We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die."

“Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?

And the Fall is different now wright?

I won't argue this further and give more details,because it is not explained in full and i don't want to give more information.
It's meant for another time,simple as that.

So if you have some comment on this , i say upfront "You win , i learn"

;)
 
Last edited:

WonderingWorrier

Active Member
To understand how i got to this , you must think out of the box , because i even exclude how the words will be gramatically correct in a sentence.
I think I might understand how you got to this.

Here:
"who argued that Rashad Khalifa's "miracle 19" theory was a hoax based on falsified data, misinterpretations of the Quran's text, and grammar inconsistencies".

It is the unrelated box that you have put me in.

You did that rather than clearly show me your sword. You win.
 

Dimi95

Active Member
I think I might understand how you got to this.

Here:
"who argued that Rashad Khalifa's "miracle 19" theory was a hoax based on falsified data, misinterpretations of the Quran's text, and grammar inconsistencies".

It is the unrelated box that you have put me in.

You did that rather than clearly show me your sword. You win.
No , my friend , i am showing you my sword,by confronting the most evil form that we acknowledge.
This is how the Bible guides me.

That Spirit that i am trying to explain to you.

I don't value it like this , you are assuming , you are getting emotional because you are uncomfortable,you don't think clearly,you can look at scientific explenation of how do people react when they are not comfortable.
Correct me if i am wrong.
I put you in that box , yes , but because of something i want to show you.

Isaiah 26:21
"For, behold, the Lord cometh out of his place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity: the earth also shall disclose her blood, and shall no more cover her slain."

and we continue direct in the next chapter.

Isaiah 27:1-9
"In that day the Lord with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.".
In that day sing ye unto her, A vineyard of red wine.

I the Lord do keep it; I will water it every moment: lest any hurt it, I will keep it night and day.
Fury is not in me: who would set the briers and thorns against me in battle? I would go through them, I would burn them together.
Or let him take hold of my strength, that he may make peace with me; and he shall make peace with me.
He shall cause them that come of Jacob to take root : Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit.
(root means the basic cause, source, or origin of something,and again i ask whose root)
Hath he smitten him, as he smote those that smote him? or is he slain according to the slaughter of them that are slain by him?
In measure, when it shooteth forth, thou wilt debate with it: he stayeth his rough wind in the day of the east wind.
By this therefore shall the iniquity of Jacob be purged; and this is all the fruit to take away his sin; when he maketh all the stones of the altar as chalkstones that are beaten in sunder, the groves and images shall not stand up.

You said true Christian..
Truth is relative my friend , i will say there are good and evil, and that good Christian is a true Christian.Do you belive this is a good ground for both of us to agree?

And , just to be clear , just as there are good Christians , there are also good people that are not Christians.

I understand this.

I just want to say to you
Good job! For even thinking of that sort of pattern.I have looked of how you came up , it's good , really it's good.
If you are willing to change the course and look on good things , i will help you finish it.
It goes beyond your source , i have already seen Some possibilities.

Try finding also other patterns , there are many..

Why i am telling you this?

Hebrews 8:5
"who serve a copy and shadow of the heavenly things, even as Moses was warned by God when he was about to make the tabernacle, for he said, "See, you shall make everything according to the pattern that was shown to you on the mountain.

Remember : the way i slay the serpent, that's how Jesus lived and died.
If you are willing to know more , i will tell you more..

Note this:
Rather comes from Old English hraþor "more quickly; earlier, sooner," also "more readily or willingly,"

You used rather to point that i don't understand the sword.

It's not about win , it's about learn!
Even if you win , you also learn!
I have learned something with what i am saying , but i will keep that for myself.

And please now , tell me that you understand more!
 
Last edited:

WonderingWorrier

Active Member
And please now , tell me that you understand more!
I think you have changed the tune of what you have said. Sounds like a "I didnt mean it like that, lets be friends" reaction,

You used rather to point that i don't understand the sword.
Correct.

No , my friend , i am showing you my sword
You didn't even mention the word sword. That is not being clear.

Try finding also other patterns , there are many..

You were not using your Miracle of 19 example in the way that you are now implying.

I remember you said this about me:
He compares the words as oposites , look at kontext!

And you also said this about me:
Your pattern is false!

Even these two statements help show a way of understanding what you were saying.
You didnt even mention the word sword. You put me in a box that you could dismiss. Then you were in a corner. You reacted.
I know if you really had a clear sword you would have come straight at me with it.

If you are willing to change the course and look on good things , i will help you finish it.
It goes beyond your source , i have already seen Some possibilities.

Do you like fruits. We could discuss fruits. Maybe you think fruits are good things.

So the question is. Can you get grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles?
"Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?" Matthew


Please consider this. Remember I have mentioned the shared place of wine and stubble earlier. Now consider the thorn being with wine and stubble.

As a thorn goeth up into the hand of a drunkard, so is a parable in the mouths of fools. Proverbs.

For while they be folden together as thorns, and while they are drunken as drunkards, they shall be devoured as stubble fully dry. Nahum


Now consider the thistle of Lebanon being with the cedar tree of Lebanon.

And Joash king of Israel sent to Amaziah king of Judah, saying, The thistle that was in Lebanon sent to the cedar that was in Lebanon, saying, Give thy daughter to my son to wife: and there passed by a wild beast that was in Lebanon, and trode down the thistle.


And the cedar planted in the wilderness (Eden), along with the Oil tree.

I will plant in the wilderness the cedar, the ****tah tree, and the myrtle, and the oil tree; I will set in the desert the fir tree, and the pine, and the box tree together: Isaiah.


Therefore the Thistle could be considered being in the place of the Oil, as the Thorn is in the place of the Wine.

Bread - Oil - Wine
Moon - Star - Sun
Spear - Sword - Bow

So I do think it is possible to get figs from thistles, and grapes from thorns. Because the figs are also as the stars. You might be able to understand the logic of this from what ive been talking about earlier . You might be able to see the connections of thistle to fig, and thorn to grape.

We can know them by their fruits. But if you cant get any figs from the thistles, then perhaps you dont really know them.


Can you please tell me what possibilities you have seen. I will listen to what you say.
 

Dimi95

Active Member
You didnt even mention the word sword. You put me in a box that you could dismiss. Then you were in a corner. You reacted.
I know if you really had a clear sword you would have come straight at me with it.
Again , you assume what i would do and not paying atention to details.
That's why i find it very helpfull to talk with atheist.You can learn from them also.I was doing this emotional part and i learned from my mistakes.Again you are wrong.(Thank you @ppp)

I said "if this was the serpent".
If is a conjunction - on condition that; in case; supposing.

So "if" changes the whole concept.

And again , you are wrong with your understanding.


Do you like fruits. We could discuss fruits. Maybe you think fruits are good things.

So the question is. Can you get grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles?
"Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?" Matthew

Please consider this. Remember I have mentioned the shared place of wine and stubble earlier. Now consider the thorn being with wine and stubble.

As a thorn goeth up into the hand of a drunkard, so is a parable in the mouths of fools. Proverbs.

For while they befolden together as thorns, and while they are drunken as drunkards, they shall be devoured as stubblefully dry. Nahum
"Stubblefully dry" is dependent on "while they are drunken as drunkards" , that's why you get "folden together as thorns"

Change "drunken as drunkards."

But i get you , this is typical Muslim behaviour - claiming "The Father is greater then the Son" and failing to understand why the Son said "the one who is comming has no power over me"

If you can't understand komplex then you can't understand simple , to get to the komplex you have to go threw the simple.

Matthew
The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are healthy, your whole body will be full of light.But if your eyes are unhealthy, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light within you is darkness, how great is that darkness!

Before making another mistake and trying to use light and darkness, learn something more about why he is saying your eyes need to be healthy.

Read something more here:

And then go back to stubble and wine

Now consider the thistle of Lebanon being with the cedar tree of Lebanon.

And Joash king of Israel sent to Amaziah king of Judah, saying, The thistle that was in Lebanon sent to the cedar that was in Lebanon, saying, Give thy daughter to my son to wife: and there passed by a wild beast that was in Lebanon, and trode down the thistle.


And the cedar planted in the wilderness (Eden), along with the Oil tree.

I will plant in the wilderness the cedar, the ****tah tree, and the myrtle, and the oil tree; I will set in the desert the fir tree, and the pine, and the box tree together: Isaiah.
And AGAIN , you are wrong.

2 Kings 14:8-14
Then Amaziah sent messengers to Jehoash son of Jehoahaz, the son of Jehu, king of Israel, with the challenge: “Come, let us face each other in battle.”

But Jehoash king of Israel replied to Amaziah king of Judah: “A thistle in Lebanon sent a message to a cedar in Lebanon, ‘Give your daughter to my son in marriage.’ Then a wild beast in Lebanon came along and trampled the thistle underfoot. 10 You have indeed defeated Edom and now you are arrogant.Glory in your victory, but stay at home!Why ask for trouble and cause your own downfall and that of Judah also?”
Amaziah, however, would not listen, so Jehoash king of Israel attacked. He and Amaziah king of Judah faced each other at Beth Shemesh in Judah.Judah was routed by Israel, and every man fled to his home.Jehoash king of Israel captured Amaziah king of Judah, the son of Joash, the son of Ahaziah, at Beth Shemesh. Then Jehoash went to Jerusalem and broke down the wall of Jerusalem from the Ephraim Gate to the Corner Gate—a section about four hundred cubits long.He took all the gold and silver and all the articles found in the temple of the Lord and in the treasuries of the royal palace. He also took hostages and returned to Samaria.

Before pointing that king of Israel attacked , please remember that prophecies about how will Jesus die.

Therefore the Thistle could be considered being in the place of the Oil, as the Thorn is in the place of the Wine.

Bread - Oil - Wine
Moon - Star - Sun
Spear - Sword - Bow

So I do think it is possible to get figs from thistles, and grapes from thorns. Because the figs are also as the stars. You might be able to understand the logic of this from what ive been talking about earlier . You might be able to see the connections of thistle to fig, and thorn to grape.

We can know them by their fruits. But if you cant get any figs from the thistles, then perhaps you dont really know them.


Can you please tell me what possibilities you have seen. I will listen to what you say.
And this is my last time saying this , i am done with you!

Last time , i am done!

Read this again :
Isaiah 26:21
"For, behold, the Lord cometh out of his place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity: the earth also shall disclose her blood, and shall no more cover her slain."

and we continue direct in the next chapter.

Isaiah 27:1-9
"In that day the Lord with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.".
In that day sing ye unto her, A vineyard of red wine.

I the Lord do keep it; I will water it every moment: lest any hurt it, I will keep it night and day.
Fury is not in me: who would set the briers and thorns against me in battle? I would go through them, I would burn them together.
Or let him take hold of my strength, that he may make peace with me; and he shall make peace with me.
He shall cause them that come of Jacob to take root : Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit.

Hath he smitten him, as he smote those that smote him? or is he slain according to the slaughter of them that are slain by him?
In measure, when it shooteth forth, thou wilt debate with it: he stayeth his rough wind in the day of the east wind.
By this therefore shall the iniquity of Jacob be purged; and this is all the fruit to take away his sin; when he maketh all the stones of the altar as chalkstones that are beaten in sunder, the groves and images shall not stand up."

It's not a possibility anymore , our conversation and my further research led me to something that will explain every Why in the World(by every Why i mean Every litterally)
"Why did God .. ?"
What i have found make the dots irrelevant - IRRELEVANT
I am amazed myself of what i have found.
I must read the Bible from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21 one more time to compare everything.

The key that was in front of everyone , but nobody saw it.

And i found this talking with you , so thank you for showing me that evil needs to be showned.
And i will now agree with you , yes , evil needs to be showned!
 
Last edited:

WonderingWorrier

Active Member
So if you have some comment on this , i say upfront "You win , i learn"

;)
I think I might have misunderstood your explanation and this comment. Wink.
I asked for clarification of your sword. And you gave me a Miracle 19 example, and you comparing opposites. Which is what you had previously said against me as shown in the two statements.

Here:
He compares the words as oposites , look at kontext!
And here:
Your pattern is false!



After you said my pattern is false you showed me an example of Miracle 19 saying its what i do.
I will show you an example of what you do,maybe you'll get it this way.

Miracle of 19 in the Quran

Bible Version
Twelve baskets remained after the 5,000 were fed by Jesus
Seven baskets remained after the 4,000 were fed by Jesus

So i can say that the remeining baskets of what he gave is the evidence of the Miracle.So that is 19

So I didnt understand why you used Miracle 19 in your reply of me asking for you to clarify your sword.


I will call now on what you said about how you see things.

Again with the Miracle of 19

Genesis 3:1
"Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?"

19 words - the Miracle of 19
Count them please.

It seemed like mocking me rather than answer with clarifying your sword. But maybe you were trying to see from a different point of view which made you sound like what you had previously said against me. You sounded like what you think of me, as comparing opposites, and a false pattern.
 
Top