• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Democrats get senate in 2020 what happens?

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
They can already and likely will impeach him. That happens exclusively, entirely, soley, and strictly only in the House. However, the accusations will pass to the Rep controlled Senate, where it's likely Trump will be acquitted. After that, I assume Trump will be protected from retrial due to the prohibitions on double jeopardy.

Only retrial on the same charge.

Plus, since impeachment *isn't* a criminal case, it isn't clear double jeopardy applies.
 

Salvador

RF's Swedenborgian
So I have seen that some are saying now Democrats have a good chance of taking over Senate and House for 2020. If so and Trump is int he office, will Democrats be able to impeach him or throw him out??????

I'm going to wager a modest sum of money that Trump gets re-elected and the Republicans will keep control of the Senate in 2020. If I were to loose both these bets, I'd seriously consider moving to Uruguay where I'd be taxed way less than how I'd be taxed in the democratic socialist republic of North America.

Election Betting Odds

Good news for my chances of staying here in America...election betting odds now are at ca. 65 percent the Republicans keep control of the Senate.
 
Last edited:

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
The fact that some media outlets have been focused on public opinion poles and speculating democrats chances in the upcoming elections says much about this entire process. It doesn't seem that to some it has been as important for the facts and truth to be heard and verified as much as how it has imcreased or decreased political parties chances, what a depressing and deplorable state of affairs.

Yes, a lot of truth to that. I think the parties themselves are to blame for much of the polarization and lack of focus on actual issues.
 

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
So I have seen that some are saying now Democrats have a good chance of taking over Senate and House for 2020. If so and Trump is int he office, will Democrats be able to impeach him or throw him out??????

I agree with most of the posters here that Democratic control of the senate in 2020 is extremely unlikely. They will gain some seats, but not control. If Trump remains in office, it will precipitate the continued downward spiral of the Republican party as they try to continually try to cover his sh*t in the cat box.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
Only retrial on the same charge.

Plus, since impeachment *isn't* a criminal case, it isn't clear double jeopardy applies.
Impeachment is the accusation. But once a judgement off not guilty/acquital, that was a trial and I would assume double jeopardy applies.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I remember this story from 4 years ago.
Tom
I don't know about four years ago. I do know that two years ago they predicted it would not happen because it worked out that the Republicans had very few people running. This time there are almost twice as many Republican seats up for grabs as Democratic seats. That means that it will be very very difficult for the Republican to maintain control of the Senate. I don't see anywhere near enough flipping for a conviction, but we can dream.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Impeachment is the accusation. But once a judgement off not guilty/acquital, that was a trial and I would assume double jeopardy applies.
Probably not. It is not the same as a criminal trial. In a criminal trial if you lose you are off to prison. In an impeachment and trial the only consequences are removal from office.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Impeachment is the accusation. But once a judgement off not guilty/acquital, that was a trial and I would assume double jeopardy applies.

I'm not sure of that. I certainly has never been tested.

Once again, it isn't strictly speaking a criminal trial. And, for example, civil suits are NOT subject to double jeopardy.

And, again, double jeopardy would not ban an impeachment on a different offense even if it applies.
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'll make a bold prediction about Dems taking the Senate...
Dems & Pubs will be at each others' throats.
Spending will balloon.
Taxes will rise.
Government will expand.

Btw, I predict the same if the Pubs keep the Senate.
 

Salvador

RF's Swedenborgian
People who talk about leaving should, for once, back up their words. So many people talk it, but hardly anyone ever actually does.

If the U.S. federal government were to attempt confiscating a substantial portion of my wealth, then I'd most certainly find a way to preserve the wealth my hard working grandfather intended for me and my family to have. If the federal government bureaucracy were to become such socialists who'd dare attempt taking more than one-third of my wealth away from me, then I'd rather be an American ex-pat in Uruguay where I'd get to keep most of the wealth I've either accumulated or inherited instead of being an overly taxed person in what would then have become the Democratic Socialist Republic of North America.
 
Last edited:

Salvador

RF's Swedenborgian
I'll make a bold prediction about Dems taking the Senate...
Dems & Pubs will be at each others' throats.
Spending will balloon.
Taxes will rise.
Government will expand.

Btw, I predict the same if the Pubs keep the Senate.
I'll make a bold prediction about Dems taking the Senate...
Dems & Pubs will be at each others' throats.
Spending will balloon.
Taxes will rise.
Government will expand.

Btw, I predict the same if the Pubs keep the Senate.

There has got to be a limit on how much control the U.S. federal government has over the economy. If U.S. government spending were to exceed a particular threshold, then the American economy would unfortunately collapse as the creators of its wealth would inevitably flee from this socialistic economic insanity.
 
Last edited:

Salvador

RF's Swedenborgian
People who talk about leaving should, for once, back up their words. So many people talk it, but hardly anyone ever actually does.

Be careful what you wish for, middle-class wealth just might happen to diminish if their society's wealth creators were to leave.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
There has got to be a limit on how much control the U.S. federal government has over the economy. If U.S. government spending were to exceed a particular threshold, then the American economy would unfortunately collapse as the creators of its wealth would inevitably flee from this socialistic economic insanity.
I see no limit on governmental power.
The 16th Amendment allows any income tax percentage.
And the Interstate Commerce Clause has been found to
apply to any intra-state economic activity.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
If the U.S. federal government were to attempt confiscating a substantial portion of my wealth, then I'd most certainly find a way to preserve the wealth my hard working grandfather intended for me and my family to have. If the federal government bureaucracy were to become such socialists who'd dare attempt taking more than one-third of my wealth away from me, then I'd rather be an American ex-pat in Uruguay where I'd get to keep most of the wealth I've either accumulated or inherited instead of being an overly taxed person in what would then have become the Democratic Socialist Republic of North America.
That's what they all say.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
Be careful what you wish for, middle-class wealth just might happen to diminish if their society's wealth creators were to leave.
Middle class wealth is already evaporating. And if your John Galts left, we be just fine and life on without them, probably better off because these "wealth creators" only roof the system to better benefit themselves.
 
Top