Depends on (a) the care and astuteness in framing the questions (b) the manner in which the poll is taken and (c) the answers you get.You dont find stats informative.
You'll recall the "three kinds of lies" ─ lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Depends on (a) the care and astuteness in framing the questions (b) the manner in which the poll is taken and (c) the answers you get.You dont find stats informative.
I'm a bit surprised about those last points about prayer and the importance of religion.why do you suppose christianity is on the decline? evidently religion is on the decline altogether.
a pew research poll shows christianity down 12% from a decade ago.
Christians continue to make up a majority of the U.S. populace, but their share of the adult population is 12 points lower in 2021 than it was in 2011. In addition, the share of U.S. adults who say they pray on a daily basis has been trending downward, as has the share who say religion is “very important” in their lives.
Depends on (a) the care and astuteness in framing the questions (b) the manner in which the poll is taken and (c) the answers you get.
You'll recall the "three kinds of lies" ─ lies, damned lies, and statistics.
why do you suppose christianity is on the decline? evidently religion is on the decline altogether.
a pew research poll shows christianity down 12% from a decade ago.
Christians continue to make up a majority of the U.S. populace, but their share of the adult population is 12 points lower in 2021 than it was in 2011. In addition, the share of U.S. adults who say they pray on a daily basis has been trending downward, as has the share who say religion is “very important” in their lives.
why do you suppose christianity is on the decline? evidently religion is on the decline altogether.
a pew research poll shows christianity down 12% from a decade ago.
Christians continue to make up a majority of the U.S. populace, but their share of the adult population is 12 points lower in 2021 than it was in 2011. In addition, the share of U.S. adults who say they pray on a daily basis has been trending downward, as has the share who say religion is “very important” in their lives.
Several reasons, here are a couple.
The methods of education have improved and people are now more willing to investigate and ask questions.
Also the internet which allows such inquisitiveness world wide.
In addition to ChristineM's reasons may I add...
Religion in the US has become in many cases politicised - mainly in favour of the GOP - that is not resonating with many young people
Religion is out of step with the majority of people in issues such as Same Sex Relationships, Abortion, Vaccines, etc.
I should add the child abuse cases that have come to the fore.
I can think of one person who was more religious in a previous life but even though the trappings were Christian, I don't believe the person was born again. In this life the person is an atheist.
Central NebraskaShocked... Wheredo you live?
I understand that. My point was that as concerns our current educational system, while rote learning has its place in getting us to remember hard facts, I think earlier generations were better at teaching the understanding of facts in many ways. I believe the current trend in education is towards realizing a need to reorganize how we teach. A trend which may just lead us full circle back to earlier methods with a modern twist.We are not talking ancient but the fairly recent decline which has occurred over the last 50 years or so.
Now what makes you say that Christianity stole morality or somehow modified it to exclude anyone not Christian? Morality, if one has it, is an aspect of human nature not human religion.Of course not. Without morality humanity would not have developed into such a state that churches were able to establish and grow. Christianity just stole morality for itself, modified it to exclude anyone not christian.
Yes it does. And when those teachings may concern human nature it is simply placing what that is within its own world view. It is merely defining human nature according to its belief system.Get christianity has its teachings.
I don't think you can be psychopathic or willingly immoral and be Christian. You can claim the label for whatever nefarious or indifferent reasons but that doesn't by itself define you as Christian. Personally I think psychopaths are born for the day of destruction. That's a deep issue. But as for immorality. Any Christian may make immoral decisions at times, according to Christian teaching nobody is immune from making mistakes but to be willingly immoral or indifferent to being immoral is not to be a Christian. Unfortunately the un-Christian Christians outnumber the true Christians and those are what most people view Christianity through. Who ultimately gets to choose who is a true Christian and who isn't? Well if Christians would actually pay attention to their scriptures it tells us. Only God gets to choose. You want to judge if you neighbor is worthy of being a Christian or not? Well that's on you. But you would be wrong to judge and that's coming from God....according to scripture.And they are still christian. It is not tour place to judge who is and who isn't christian
Unfortunately many Christians I personally believe are ignorant of their own religion.I agree here. But many christians don't
And therein lies the problem, you and other Christians are still classing things like same sex marriage as sin. The younger generation has no problem with this, they call it LOVE.I believe that makes sense. The more sin becomes acceptable the less likely the person is to be a Christian.
why do you suppose christianity is on the decline? ...
I'd like to jump in here with a question. First of all, I want to be clear that I don't judge same sex marriages.And therein lies the problem, you and other Christians are still classing things like same sex marriage as sin. The younger generation has no problem with this, they call it LOVE.
Is it any different from heterosexual relationships? Just change 'homo' to "hetero" in your question and the answer is the same.I'd like to jump in here with a question. First of all, I want to be clear that I don't judge same sex marriages.
I just was wondering that if I can Love another man but am not homosexual, how do we classify homosexuality if not by Love for the same gender? Is homosexuality then classified by the desire to have sex with someone of the same gender without consideration of whether or not love is involved? In other words, don't we classify homosexuality by the desire to have sex with the same gender not by Loving the same gender?
North America is certainly an outlier in this regard. Europe's many cultures are almost exclusively secular. Noticeably so even in once devoutly Catholic Ireland, Italy and Spain. I don't see this as a bad thing, though I am myself religious, in the loosest sense of the term. Most people feel free to choose there own paths here, on reaching maturity; and that is as it should be, I believe. So long as someone looks after the old churches.
Don't know why you guys are different. Perhaps because your country was founded by religious dissenters? Or maybe religion - Christianity in particular - has evolved into a more saleable product, in the land of the free market?
I'm a bit surprised about those last points about prayer and the importance of religion.
5-10 years ago, while Christianity was shrinking overall, it was only moderate or liberal denominations that were shrinking (though very rapidly). Extremist and Evangelical denominations were actually growing... just not enough to make for the loss from the moderates.
Hmm.
You dont find stats informative.
Is that your answer? It seems to be a non answer to my question. I never indicated that it was any different. It just seemed to me that you were putting an emphasis on the Love aspect as having something to do with defining "same" sex marriages. It may be assumed that both preferences get married out of Love for each other (hetero and homosexual couples) but Love is not how we define or differentiate homosexuality. Is that correct?Is it any different from heterosexual relationships? Just change 'homo' to "hetero" in your question and the answer is the same.
You dont find stats informative.
Apologies, I misunderstood what you were trying to say.Is that your answer? It seems to be a non answer to my question. I never indicated that it was any different. It just seemed to me that you were putting an emphasis on the Love aspect as having something to do with defining "same" sex marriages. It may be assumed that both preferences get married out of Love for each other (hetero and homosexual couples) but Love is not how we define or differentiate homosexuality. Is that correct?
First of all we need to define how we determine what wrong means. And for me, what you mean by casual.Apologies, I misunderstood what you were trying to say.
What is wrong with consensual casual sex?