Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Debate: Does it Proof you are a fool, or just a smart-a.s.s?
I get a crush if ego get a crash
If other is right, debating him proofs I am a fool
If other is wrong, him debating proofs he's a fool
Only a fool would think they were a smart ***, a debate is for absolute.Debate: Does it Proof you are a fool, or just a smart-a.s.s?
I get a crush if ego get a crash
If other is right, debating him proofs I am a fool
If other is wrong, him debating proofs he's a fool
The problem lies in the fact that anyone who understand the rules of logic
Please define your understanding of the rules of logic?
Please define your understanding of the rules of logic?
Could be either
It's better to go for neither.And your reply might imply you are "neither"
My first thought was when I read it: 1+1=2
If other is right, debating him proofs I am a fool
If other is wrong, him debating proofs he's a fool
Ok, so you see 1+1=2 as logic. What about 1+1=1 ?
Would you find that logical?
I suppose the larger question here is who doesn't find arithmetic logical?
Ok, so you see 1+1=2 as logic. What about 1+1=1 ?
Well there is arithmetic that may seem illogical but is logical was my point.
Think about situations where 1+1=1
Example, a beaker collects 1 + 1 falling raindrops
I look in the beaker to see 1+ 1 = 1
There are no rulesUse the internet - it is your friend.