• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Death and Evolution

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Is becoming old and die was good for the species?
Death is good for earth and for more species to come which is a sign that someone
has planned for it, living for some years and giving birth for new comers.

What do you think? was it just a coincidence or a programmed death mechanism?
I don't know what you mean by "coincidence", but it certainly wasn't planned or designed into our species. Organic organisms die due, at the very least, to cell degeneration. Simple as that.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
I don't know what you mean by "coincidence", but it certainly wasn't planned or designed into our species. Organic organisms die due, at the very least, to cell degeneration. Simple as that.

Death is a natural phenomenon but it doesn't mean that it was shaped by nature,
the death is a must otherwise no one could survive due to the lack of resources,
nature won't understand what is good and what is bad for the future of earth, death
is planned from the beginning and it's a good plan rather than thinking of it as "just happened to be so",
see for example how dogs die in very early ages, and still it's natural for dogs, whereas humans can
live to around 100 years and it's natural for humans, whereas turtles never get old and they die
by a disease or by an accident and that's still nature.
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
Death is a natural phenomenon but it doesn't mean that it was shaped by nature,
the death is a must otherwise no one could survive due to the lack of resources,
nature won't understand what is good and what is bad for the future of earth, death
is planned from the beginning and it's a good plan rather than thinking of it as "just happened to be so",
see for example how dogs die in very early ages, and still it's natural for dogs, whereas humans can
live to around 100 years and it's natural for humans, whereas turtles never get old and they die
by a disease or by an accident and that's still nature.
Why do you think that the fact that different species have different life spans points to it being designed?
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Why do you think that the fact that different species have different life spans points to it being designed?

And why do you think they have such different life spans, why for example the turtle
never get old, since you believe that it's natural for cells to degenerate, then why it
doesn't happen with turtles?
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
And why do you think they have such different life spans, why for example the turtle
never get old, since you believe that it's natural for cells to degenerate, then why it
doesn't happen with turtles?
That simply isn't true. Turtles most definitely age. Their lifespan is long, but it's not like they would life forever if they weren't killed by something external. A turtle that is completely healthy and is never killed by outside forces like predators, weather, etc. will certainly still die from old age just like all other animals (including humans).
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Death is a natural phenomenon but it doesn't mean that it was shaped by nature,

Actually, that is exactly what it means.


the death is a must otherwise no one could survive due to the lack of resources,

True enough. It does not follow that it was "planned".

nature won't understand what is good and what is bad for the future of earth,

Nature, to a very large extent, defines what is good or bad for the future of Earth.

More specifically, the boundaries imposed by nature for the consequences of our actions define a lot of morality.


death is planned from the beginning and it's a good plan rather than thinking of it as "just happened to be so",

Sorry, but this claim of yours is neither well connected to reality nor logically consistent with itself.


see for example how dogs die in very early ages, and still it's natural for dogs, whereas humans can
live to around 100 years and it's natural for humans, whereas turtles never get old and they die
by a disease or by an accident and that's still nature.

No idea of what meaning you see in that. If anything, it hints at a lack of intentional design.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
That simply isn't true. Turtles most definitely age. Their lifespan is long, but it's not like they would life forever if they weren't killed by something external. A turtle that is completely healthy and is never killed by outside forces like predators, weather, etc. will certainly still die from old age just like all other animals (including humans).

But some others believe it to be true.
http://io9.gizmodo.com/5618046/the-...never-grow-old---and-how-we-can-learn-from-it
 

leibowde84

Veteran Member
"Non-aging" animals ("negligible senescence" animals) still, inevitably, die. Turtles, for example, still age. They just age incredibly slowly.

"Turtles, for example, were once thought to lack senescence, but more extensive observations have found evidence of decreasing fitness with age.[1]"

From: Warner, Daniel A.; Miller, David A. W.; Bronikowski, Anne M.; Janzen, Fredric J. (2016-06-07). "Decades of field data reveal that turtles senesce in the wild". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(23): 6502–6507. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 4988574
9px-Lock-green.svg.png
. PMID 27140634. doi:10.1073/pnas.1600035113.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
And there's no other way to cope with limited resources than killing people? How about not making any new ones? And don't get me going, because apparently I can conjure up dozens of more workable scenarios than you god seems able to. (Of course, as always, I attribute the failings of your god to your own lack of real analysis.)

Your scenario of not bringing new ones will also end life on earth, fighting and wars by itself
will put limits to humans from the beginning, also if the purpose is testing the number of
souls then how could we know what these numbers are?
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
"Non-aging" animals ("negligible senescence" animals) still, inevitably, die. Turtles, for example, still age. They just age incredibly slowly.

"Turtles, for example, were once thought to lack senescence, but more extensive observations have found evidence of decreasing fitness with age.[1]"

From: Warner, Daniel A.; Miller, David A. W.; Bronikowski, Anne M.; Janzen, Fredric J. (2016-06-07). "Decades of field data reveal that turtles senesce in the wild". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(23): 6502–6507. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 4988574
9px-Lock-green.svg.png
. PMID 27140634. doi:10.1073/pnas.1600035113.

And what do you think of the jellyfish and do you think that immortality is biologically impossible?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Prophecies and some other facts can't be ignored, it isn't just that God is in heaven,
but there are signs that such thing is a reality and not a myth.
Ignored? Frankly, most of the time I don't even remember their existence. So-called prophecies are unconvincing at best.
 
Top