That 1st law I also believe works fine for describing physical plane phenomena. It can’t tell us though if the spiritual planes exist or not.
But that debate is outside the intent of this thread.
Correct, it cannot tell us about the imaginary
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That 1st law I also believe works fine for describing physical plane phenomena. It can’t tell us though if the spiritual planes exist or not.
But that debate is outside the intent of this thread.
So another ‘belief’ you have is that the paranormal/spiritual is just imagination. That sounds like it should be one of your answers to the OP question.Correct, it cannot tell us about the imaginary
Have you ever seen a design with no designer? The design itself is hard evidence.
So another ‘belief’ you have is that the paranormal/spiritual is just imagination. That sounds like it should be one of your answers to the OP question.
So all you atheists out there in RF land, please inform us all of a few of the things you believe in.
Have you ever seen a design with no designer?since it is on a debate section... I thought I would add to the debate.
Have you ever seen a design with no designer? The design itself is hard evidence.
Love (as in loving your children) is the hard wire of who God is.
Why?
To paraphrase Lincoln out of context: The world will little note, nor long remember, what we say here...
I’m not claiming proof but rather a preponderance of evidence and argumentation fully considered.Unless you can prove otherwise that's the way it is.
I’m not claiming proof but rather a preponderance of evidence and argumentation fully considered.
So you may also have a belief in ‘scientism’ which I don’t share.
Do you necessarily consider 'scientism' to be an insult? Some people are willing to own that viewpoint.I think you and i have a different thread hold for what counts as evidence
Oh and now we have the insults... Cool
Do you necessarily consider 'scientism' to be an insult? Some people are willing to own that viewpoint.
Scientism - Wikipedia
Scientism is the view that science is the best or only objective means by which society should determine normative and epistemological values.
Do you think there are other means (such as spiritual traditions) that you respect?
I mean, why not?Why?
I actually meant it as a valid way to look at things. If science hasn't proven it (the spiritual) then I am not going to believe it. That is scientism.People tend to throw the applet "scientism" as an insult.
I actually meant it as a valid way to look at things. If science hasn't proven it (the spiritual) then I am not going to believe it. That is scientism.
Spiritual and paranormal experience are not 'non issues' or just imaginary to me (even if science doesn't have tools to study them).Nope, first, science is not in the business of proof but of examining falsifiable evidence.
Second science has no evidence for "spiritual". Without evidence bit cannot study it.
It is not scientism, it is a non issue
What are you going on about? I point to the best we're going to get - which is what we can agree on is part of the reality we experience. ...
Nope, first, science is not in the business of proof but of examining falsifiable evidence.
Second science has no evidence for "spiritual". Without evidence bit cannot study it.
It is not scientism, it is a non issue
Spiritual and paranormal experience are not 'non issues' or just imaginary to me (even if science doesn't have tools to study them).