• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Dark Force or Flat Earth?!

questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Two pebbles (small stones), which fly in a circle around the Sun, form a segment (straight line) that turns its direction relatively to distant stars: the segment for the annual period will not be directed to the area of the same star. Why is the axis of the Earth for the year period almost does not depart from the Polar Star?

In the inertial frame of reference, the direction of the segment between the pebbles always coincide with the direction of the axis of rotation of the Earth: Newton's First law as conservation of direction of segment between two small stones (not only the conservation of angular momentum we see in inertial laboratory!). Note, that the axis of rotation of the Earth is not perpendicular to the plane of the orbit around the Sun.

It turns out, that in Newton's theory, in addition to Dark Matter, there is also a Dark Force turning the axis of the Earth towards the Polar Star. However, the Dark Force might not be introduced, if the followers of the Flat Earth are right.

All rights reserved by God: under the fear of hell do not make plagiarism, do not copy without my permission! Write me here: [email protected]
Bruce-Almighty.jpg
 
Last edited:
Polymath257

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Conservation of angular momentum. *sigh*

Over periods of thousands of years, the direction of the axis does change and we have different 'pole stars'.
 
questfortruth

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
Polymath257 said:
Conservation of angular momentum. *sigh*

Over periods of thousands of years, the direction of the axis does change and we have different 'pole stars'.
Click to expand...
In the inertial frame of reference, the direction of the segment between the pebbles always coincide with the direction of the axis of rotation of the Earth: Newton's First law as conservation of direction of segment between two small stones (not only the conservation of angular momentum we see in inertial laboratory!).
 
Valjean

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
An axis, by definition, is the line through a rotating body that does not move.

Extend the axis of anything rotating, and it has to point somewhere. Rotate a basketball or a top on your floor and the axis will point to a particular spot on your ceiling. No magical intervention or design involved.

Currently our planet's axis is pretty closely aligns with Polaris. In the past it pointed in a different direction; to a different star. In future, it'll point somewhere else. No meaningful pattern or purpose there.

As for the line segment between two planets, I don't think I take your meaning. Are you asking why a line between two revolving planets sweeps a plain, as opposed to a rotational axis' steady direction?

This seems like elementary geometry. Go out on a dark night with a flashlight/torch, shine it away from you and spin around in place. The line of shine (love those technical terms) will sweep a circle around you, while your axis of rotation, from your feet to your head, will not change.
Nothing strange, abstract or meaningful here. :)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top