firedragon
Veteran Member
Due to a recent conversation, this being a subject that could be objectively discussed I thought I will open a new thread to do so. There were several claims about the prophecy of Bahaullah cited in the Tipitaka mentioned in this forum that I would like to address. I am no expert on the Bahai scripture, thus I would like to be enlightened if there are any areas to be.
The particular chapter of the Tipitaka in question was the Chakkavatti Sutta where the Bahai's claim is a prophecy of Bahaullah. This is the coming of a so called "Metteyya" or "maithreya" who is an eschatological figure in the Buddhist scripture they believe is yet to come, yet of course the Bahai's claim he has, by the name of Bahaullah. The points I have are as follows: The Bahai claim to prophecy, and the criticism of it, concisely put.
1. The name: Bahaullah means "Glory of God" which I presume stems from the Arabic word Bahaa meaning beauty, glory as in an emanating light. Metteya in its essence means empathy, good will. Mettha. I am not sure if its an official claim that even the meaning of the name can be reconciled but this I state since the claim I have seen, so I am open to correction.
2. Signs of lifespans: I am not sure if the proponent of this theory has read the Chakkavatti Sutta, at least, because it seems like the Sutta has so many things they seem to either missed or not understood. It states that human lifespan was 80,000 and will reduce bit by bit to 10. It was said that during in that time these people perceived time differently so 80k lifespan could have been just 80 years, but then in that case how much would 10 be? a few seconds? So when Bahaullah was born, what was our lifespan on average and could that be reconciled with this text in the Tipitaka? The Sutta simply says that from a maximum of 80,000 years, a human lifespan has now come down to 100 which is the current maximum. Thus, this argument fails every time to say they misunderstood time for some reason. Did they misunderstand 100 as well? Is that also to be divided by 1000? which means the life span is only around 37 days?
3. A Mahana's signature: The Sutta Pitaka is doctrinal, unlike the AbiDhamma Pitaka. It speaks of a monks signature. The first signature taught in the Sutta (I mean specifically Chakkavatti Sutta with the Metteyas coming, exactly there) is "Kamehi Vivichcha" which means "detached from sensuality". Basically, no sex, no thinking of sex, Zilch. Metteyya is supposed to be the Sugatho, Loka vidu, Anuttaro purusadhamma sarathi satthaaa...... He will not have sex, he will not think of sex, he will be the ultimate role model who will promote and preach to his Mahana's to stay away from sex and many, many other things. How would that be reconciled with Bahaullah?
4. The time: Mind you, Maitreya is supposed to be born during the lifespan of a human being is 80,000. And at the time there will be a Sakvithi king. His name would be Shadkha. Who is that king? If life span goes down to 10, and sexual maturity at the age of 5, when is it going to be 80,000?
5. His path: It is this king who gives up all his wealth and the "Gihi GeY" which means the life of a household. Just like the Gautama, he will leave everything including a sexual life, children, family, wife, everything and then he will become Samma Sambudhu Maitreya. He will become Pavidi or a hermit, he will meditate and attain the status of Buddha, the ultimate level of intelligence. So did Bahaullah go through that? Did he live in a palace built by the king "Mahapanada"?
6. Innate Knowledge: Bahai's claim that Bahaullah had innate knowledge. But Maitreya doesnt have innate knowledge. He as I said above leaves his life, meditates and becomes enlightened.
7. His teachings: He will teach the Mahana's to leave their lives and follow in his footsteps, which means complete detachment. No sex, no family, no children, no money. Did Bahaullah have this and did he teach this?
8. The status: Bahaullah is supposed to be a manifestation of the supreme God. I think this will be the most responded to question with some buddhist passage like the Karama sutra, but I am asking about Maitreya. Will not this be the most significant reconciliation? How would that be done? The Chakkavatti Sutta explains that Maitreya will work to be enlightened in order to attain nirvana, not that he was born a manifestation of God.
Edit: As a side note I would like to request the passages Bahaullah himself noted about him being the Maitreya to understand what he said.
Peace.
The particular chapter of the Tipitaka in question was the Chakkavatti Sutta where the Bahai's claim is a prophecy of Bahaullah. This is the coming of a so called "Metteyya" or "maithreya" who is an eschatological figure in the Buddhist scripture they believe is yet to come, yet of course the Bahai's claim he has, by the name of Bahaullah. The points I have are as follows: The Bahai claim to prophecy, and the criticism of it, concisely put.
1. The name: Bahaullah means "Glory of God" which I presume stems from the Arabic word Bahaa meaning beauty, glory as in an emanating light. Metteya in its essence means empathy, good will. Mettha. I am not sure if its an official claim that even the meaning of the name can be reconciled but this I state since the claim I have seen, so I am open to correction.
2. Signs of lifespans: I am not sure if the proponent of this theory has read the Chakkavatti Sutta, at least, because it seems like the Sutta has so many things they seem to either missed or not understood. It states that human lifespan was 80,000 and will reduce bit by bit to 10. It was said that during in that time these people perceived time differently so 80k lifespan could have been just 80 years, but then in that case how much would 10 be? a few seconds? So when Bahaullah was born, what was our lifespan on average and could that be reconciled with this text in the Tipitaka? The Sutta simply says that from a maximum of 80,000 years, a human lifespan has now come down to 100 which is the current maximum. Thus, this argument fails every time to say they misunderstood time for some reason. Did they misunderstand 100 as well? Is that also to be divided by 1000? which means the life span is only around 37 days?
3. A Mahana's signature: The Sutta Pitaka is doctrinal, unlike the AbiDhamma Pitaka. It speaks of a monks signature. The first signature taught in the Sutta (I mean specifically Chakkavatti Sutta with the Metteyas coming, exactly there) is "Kamehi Vivichcha" which means "detached from sensuality". Basically, no sex, no thinking of sex, Zilch. Metteyya is supposed to be the Sugatho, Loka vidu, Anuttaro purusadhamma sarathi satthaaa...... He will not have sex, he will not think of sex, he will be the ultimate role model who will promote and preach to his Mahana's to stay away from sex and many, many other things. How would that be reconciled with Bahaullah?
4. The time: Mind you, Maitreya is supposed to be born during the lifespan of a human being is 80,000. And at the time there will be a Sakvithi king. His name would be Shadkha. Who is that king? If life span goes down to 10, and sexual maturity at the age of 5, when is it going to be 80,000?
5. His path: It is this king who gives up all his wealth and the "Gihi GeY" which means the life of a household. Just like the Gautama, he will leave everything including a sexual life, children, family, wife, everything and then he will become Samma Sambudhu Maitreya. He will become Pavidi or a hermit, he will meditate and attain the status of Buddha, the ultimate level of intelligence. So did Bahaullah go through that? Did he live in a palace built by the king "Mahapanada"?
6. Innate Knowledge: Bahai's claim that Bahaullah had innate knowledge. But Maitreya doesnt have innate knowledge. He as I said above leaves his life, meditates and becomes enlightened.
7. His teachings: He will teach the Mahana's to leave their lives and follow in his footsteps, which means complete detachment. No sex, no family, no children, no money. Did Bahaullah have this and did he teach this?
8. The status: Bahaullah is supposed to be a manifestation of the supreme God. I think this will be the most responded to question with some buddhist passage like the Karama sutra, but I am asking about Maitreya. Will not this be the most significant reconciliation? How would that be done? The Chakkavatti Sutta explains that Maitreya will work to be enlightened in order to attain nirvana, not that he was born a manifestation of God.
Edit: As a side note I would like to request the passages Bahaullah himself noted about him being the Maitreya to understand what he said.
Peace.
Last edited: