gnostic
The Lost One
To creationists:
Here (and at previous forums that I had joined), it would seem that some creationists have limited understanding of evolutionary biology or they tends to misunderstand the theory.
So the questions for creationists are:
The common misconception from creationists is confusing evolution with abiogenesis.
Evolution and its theory only deal with biology, more specifically with changes to anatomy, right up to genetic or cellular level. So evolutionary theory tried to explain why the species differ, and trying to trace it common ancestry, hence the origin of species. The centrepiece of evolution is natural selection.
And this bring up my last question:
So if evolution is not about how life began, then why do creationists object to evolution so much?
I don't understand your vehement objections to evolution.
Here (and at previous forums that I had joined), it would seem that some creationists have limited understanding of evolutionary biology or they tends to misunderstand the theory.
So the questions for creationists are:
Do you think evolution is about the origin of life?
Do you think evolution is about cosmogony?
Do you know the difference between evolution and abiogenesis?
The science dealing with origin of life is called Abiogenesis.Do you think evolution is about cosmogony?
Do you know the difference between evolution and abiogenesis?
The common misconception from creationists is confusing evolution with abiogenesis.
Evolution and its theory only deal with biology, more specifically with changes to anatomy, right up to genetic or cellular level. So evolutionary theory tried to explain why the species differ, and trying to trace it common ancestry, hence the origin of species. The centrepiece of evolution is natural selection.
And this bring up my last question:
So if evolution is not about how life began, then why do creationists object to evolution so much?
I don't understand your vehement objections to evolution.
Last edited: