As I said what was achieved setting eyes on the wings wasn't a natural process. Everything is already written and I have explained with detail the experiences in the past so I don't think I have to repeat it again. Same happens with adaptations, they can't go beyond certain limits. None of the things you have written have demonstrated "jumps" from species to others.
Even Darwin admit the stupidity of his own logic about the evolution of a complex organ like the eye. Imagine how come the species reproduced themselves until the sexual parts were ready and compatible to interact with each other. It just wouldn't work until each and every part is fully developed! So, if the system would take that time and effort to produce sexual organs, why to create them in first place? Yet, even now after alleguedly millions of years of evolution, we have the same chickens with eggs, the different kind of eggs of the reptiles, the feathers of the birds, the fin in sharks, etc. All kind of Russian salad. No evolution to transform into something else. No bull&%$# ! That story always sound fishy but is marvelous design and set in magazines and BBC specials on tv.All crap packed in golden packages.
All the strata evidence in geological layers demonstrate an explosion of life in different times, no half way process between one thing and another. I don't have the desire to mention each and every scientists (in a long list) admiting insects were insects since the beginning of their appearance into this planet, the same happens with birds, mammals, etc. I could and you can send them letters to respective universities for them (as experts) take you out of misery. But I won't. It's you the one who believes that litter. You do your homework. Mentioning 1% of "good" mutations won't lead you to new species. That's your dogma and I have already mentioned what scientists say. If you don't wanna believe them nothing that I say will change your mind. So let it be written,so let it be done.
Some animals may dissapear and had different shape, yet the dissapearence of some never explained how did they come in first place. That was always a tricky argument used by evolucionists. I can ask you how come spermatozoid appears or egg cell. It's already a program made by a law the scientists rely upon. More than million animal species have a singular program based upon the same "letters" in DNA with the proper alterations. It never meant they HAD to evolve one from another. Darwin , for example, set an imbecil argument about the peaks of some birds, since they were different they meant evolution. That was a huge mistake. That's just a simple adaptation in the same DNA plan. If you now go and say the same idiotic argument in a university talking about the differences of noses in human races they are gonna laugh at you and explain the superficial differences and the genotype and phenotype.
I have said the genetic experience was made upon those "hominids".
Whole life in the universe is something not even the biggest mind have unraveled. Probably you're aware some of the brightest minds are suggesting the whole universe is a hollogram based upon binary code (or other codes) information. Now, if a narrow minded archeologist and palenthologist finds a rudimentary sharp stone like an arrow point, there's no problem in admiting there was someone who did it. Sagan sent a message in code to be understood by alien inteligence. If we receive a code from outside we will recognize an entity, right? But when you see DNA code or marvelous laws in the universe and cosmo - experts talk about anthropic principle, how come the same people can't see evidence of a Law Giver? Is an arrow or Sagan's message something better than life? Therefore, that's my answer to you. God didn't make our life on Earth directly as we understand from Hebrew words in Genesis. There were other creatures created somehow in spiritual realms. These creatures sowed life on Earth. It was not an stupid deaf and dumb meteor in parmsperm theory. When different species created in different times (days in Hebrew is "yown" and indicates thousands of years or even millions, sorry Creationists!) were already existing. It was time to select some of the creatures (maybe Neanderthal) to make genetic experiences to forward "evolution" in short time.
By the way, I don't pretend to write here everything the people believe is usually what they are lead to "eat". I can start with the parallax calculations with trigonometry awfully applied to far away stars and ending in the ignorance about our own planet Earth and Moon formation, past rotation and spinning around the Sun , each one of the methods measuring activity on time RATHER THAN TIME, spilliting of Pangea (the cause is ignored) ,etc,etc,etc.
