One fact to Refute evolution.
For those who believe in the theory of evolution.
Why did evolution have to be tested, to know whether it's true or not.
All things require evidence to determine whether they are true. It does not "make" them true, it allows us to know that they are true.
To test something, that means it's not true, until it's tested to show it's true.
This is a false statement. Testing a thing allows us to know that they are true, it does not make an untrue thing true. Something is true or not true whether or not evidence has been provided to support either claim. The important thing to remember is that it is not rational to consider a thing true without sufficient good evidence to know it is true.
This why Christians don't have to test the bible all because Christians already know the Bible is true
They can believe it is true, but they cannot know it is true without sufficient evidence.
Where as evolution had to be tested, to find if it's true or not true.
Yes, it has been tested repeatedly in a number of scientific disciplines. The testing confirms the truthfulness of it.
That's like going to take a test, you take a test to show if your qualified or not.
What's the problem with that? A test provides evidence. it is not the test, but the evidence it provides that is important.
Therefore to test the theory of evolution, is to see if it's qualified or not.
The theory of evolution does not require qualification, it requires evidence to support it's premises. It has that evidential support, unlike the Bible.
That means evolution wasn't qualified, from the start.until it took the test.
Qualification for what? It qualifies as a theory and it qualifies as a fact.
You mean it was simply a hypothesis before there was sufficient evidence? Well, yes, that is as it should be. Now we have sufficient evidence so it is both a theory (which explains the process), and a fact (or more properly, a set of facts supported by evidence).....unlike the Bible.
Where as the bible did not have to take any test to be qualified, The bible was qualified right from the start.
Define "qualified". You have committed a fallacy by changing the word "tested" to the word "qualified". Who and/or what did the qualification? The driving test you alluded to above provided evidence to qualify the driver taking the test. To hold to the same rule, where is the test that provides the evidence for things in the Bible, especially the supernatural claims?
Therefore Christians do not have to test the bible to see if it's qualified, We already know that the Bible is qualified.
I reject a number of your premises, because they are either fallacious or unsubstantiated, and I reject your conclusion because it is founded on fallacies and unsubstantiated claims.