Super.It matters to me
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Super.It matters to me
Too many drugs have latent side effects that pop up years later. There are all kinds of law suits for just that.
However any drug can/will have a side effects. The severity is what matters.
I can do what I like with my own body, period, unless the government mandates vaccines.It is your ability to pass it on and harm others, You can do what you like with your own body.
And so it is always a balance between the benefits and the risks.
In this case, we have the balance between possible risks of a new vaccine and the known risk of this virus and the known ability of the vaccines to reduce the spread of this virus. So the benefits will be things like having an economy again, being able to meet loved ones, and being able to travel.
We already know this virus has long term side effects, even on those who have 'moderate' illness from it. The 'long haulers' are even benefited by the virus.
I've had similar choices in my life. I have severe asthma. When the 'new' asthma drugs came out in the early 80's, it was almost miraculous how much better I felt. The ones that came out later were even better for treating the asthma. Did I know at the time what the long term consequences of these meds would be? No. Nobody did. But they meant that I would *live* to experience those consequences. Which is better than NOT living to experience the consequences.
It was certainly *possible* for these meds to mean that I would have liver cancer by now. i don't. And there is no evidence that they cause such. But when I started them, nobody knew that.
i feel this is similar. Our economy has been shut down because of this virus. Over half a million people have died in this country. many survivors have long term health issues. So I compare the ability to prevent even MORE damage to the risk that this virus will have unpleasant after effect in a decade. In my mind, there is no real question: get the vaccine and have *fewer* side effects that you would if you don't.
I hope whatever is done will help people get back to work so the economy recovers because people have to live and have their basic needs met. However, people do not need all the things they "believe" they need, they just want them. I have no interest in returning to what is considered "normal" by most people as I believe that this world and the way people are/were living needs a complete overhaul.Well hopefully the vaccines will do a good enough job of returning us to normality.
I think it is going to be a very long time. People "believe" that the vaccines are a panacea, but I don't think that is what will prove to be the case. Why, in spite of the fact that so many people have been fully vaccinated in the United States are cases going up? Time will tell.Of course, with all the mutations going on, this is likely to take longer than expected and we can't be sure how long we will have to live with some uncertainties.
I’ve had the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine and have the second dose next week. I’m a health worker on the frontline of caring for people in the community. Its vital I have been vaccinated and I trust the science behind it.
I’ve had the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine and have the second dose next week. I’m a health worker on the frontline of caring for people in the community. Its vital I have been vaccinated and I trust the science behind it.
And so it is always a balance between the benefits and the risks.
In this case, we have the balance between possible risks of a new vaccine and the known risk of this virus and the known ability of the vaccines to reduce the spread of this virus. So the benefits will be things like having an economy again, being able to meet loved ones, and being able to travel.
We already know this virus has long term side effects, even on those who have 'moderate' illness from it. The 'long haulers' are even benefited by the virus.
I've had similar choices in my life. I have severe asthma. When the 'new' asthma drugs came out in the early 80's, it was almost miraculous how much better I felt. The ones that came out later were even better for treating the asthma. Did I know at the time what the long term consequences of these meds would be? No. Nobody did. But they meant that I would *live* to experience those consequences. Which is better than NOT living to experience the consequences.
It was certainly *possible* for these meds to mean that I would have liver cancer by now. i don't. And there is no evidence that they cause such. But when I started them, nobody knew that.
i feel this is similar. Our economy has been shut down because of this virus. Over half a million people have died in this country. many survivors have long term health issues. So I compare the ability to prevent even MORE damage to the risk that this virus will have unpleasant after effect in a decade. In my mind, there is no real question: get the vaccine and have *fewer* side effects that you would if you don't.
I am glad to hear you got the vaccine. It certainly is vital that you get the vaccine given your particular situation.I’ve had the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine and have the second dose next week. I’m a health worker on the frontline of caring for people in the community. Its vital I have been vaccinated and I trust the science behind it.
I don't work out in public. I don't go out into the public much. I'm around cats more than people. Those 3 things also affected my choice on whether or not to take the vaccine.I don't work out in public. I don't go out into the public much. I'm around horses more than people. Those 3 things also affected my choice on whether or not to take the vaccine
I have not chosen anything, I just like to look at all the information before making a choice, not just one side.I'm also curious - you say you're not a medical expert (and Bossche is a vet, rather than a medic) or in the biological sciences so why not accept the overwhelming consensus of the actual experts? Also, given that there are multiple different dissenting voices, why choose this one?
All people are not motivated by the same things.To those who answered "no," I'm curious: have you thought about the fact that more than 365 MILLION shots have been given around the world, and we're hearing, what, next-to-nothing about bad effects, and a lot about the fact that the vaccines appear super-effective in preventing serious illness and death?
Just curious...
It's a patriotic duty to one's country (and planet) to take the vaccine to protect one's neighbor, just as it is one's duty to go to war to protect them if needed, whatever the risk to himself. Imagine a potential recruit or draftee taking the position that, "It's my body and I'll decide what's best for it. Your fears don't trump mine. Mine trump yours"
Just how is a vaccine refuser different from a draft dodger making a decision to protect himself when those around him need him to take a risk for them?
If I remember correctly you said your are a physician. If I also remember correctly since Dec 2020 the CDC recommends that the first supplies of covid vaccine be given to healthcare personnel.
Was there a reason why its taken so long for you to get the vaccine?
What's the situation in New Zealand with regard to Covid deniers and antivaxxers?
Fascinating. The "known effects" are, in general:All people are not motivated by the same things.
I am not concerned about the side effects of the vaccine, I am concerned about the known and unknown effects.
It is a tradeoff. I do not want my cells reprogrammed to fight off the virus "just in case" I might get the virus.
I am not worried about preventing serious illness or death because I am not exposed to anyone whereby I could catch the virus.
If I was, that would be a reason to rethink my decision.