Altfish
Veteran Member
That's a bit strong. I could argue that your voters are incompetent. After all we are talking about a relatively small amount spent on an initiative, a vote of the people. No politicians directly involved. Your people got bought off for peanuts compared to what it would take to get such an initiative passed here.
Also initiatives tend to be a bit more conservative than the legislature. There have been a couple of exceptions in my state. Gay marriage was an initiative here, as was pot legalization. Most initiatives that pass are involved in reigning in the spending of the state.
In theory there are strict limits on the amount each party can spend on an election. When these limits are broken there are financial penalties. The problem is the penalties are relatively small (there is a call for them to be raised) and actually spotting and proving the overspend is not as easy as it sounds.That's a bit strong. I could argue that your voters are incompetent. After all we are talking about a relatively small amount spent on an initiative, a vote of the people. No politicians directly involved. Your people got bought off for peanuts compared to what it would take to get such an initiative passed here.
Also initiatives tend to be a bit more conservative than the legislature. There have been a couple of exceptions in my state. Gay marriage was an initiative here, as was pot legalization. Most initiatives that pass are involved in reigning in the spending of the state.
I think you can argue that 50% + voters in any election are incompetent, easily swung by a media with an agenda or just vote on one issue. We do have a massive advantage in the UK in that religion plays little part in our elections. There is no such thing as the 'evangelical' vote.