1. Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Featured Cosmology of the Electric Universe

Discussion in 'Science and Religion' started by Native, Feb 28, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Native

    Native Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,570
    Ratings:
    +493
    Religion:
    Natural Perceptions
    Oh dear me! I otherwise reasently read somehwere the E&M forces to count each other completely out.
     
  2. Native

    Native Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,570
    Ratings:
    +493
    Religion:
    Natural Perceptions
    So does denials too of what isn´t known as consensus in standard cosmology = The EU Model.
     
  3. Polymath257

    Polymath257 Think & Care
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    19,598
    Ratings:
    +22,933
    Religion:
    Non-theist
    Did I say that? No, I did not.

    I *did* say that they *tend* to cancel each other out in larger materials because there are equal numbers of positive and negative charges, so the result is neutral.

    Again, look at my *analogy*. If you alternatively add and subtract a large number, the result is smaller than if you always add even a much smaller number. The same happens for forces: if you have a force with two polarities (positive and negative), the result of adding together many from both polarities tends to be small. If, however, you always add, even a much smaller force, the net result can be quite large.

    This is why gravity is not significant on the atomic scale but E&M is. But, on a planetary scale, the effects are reversed: planets are large enough that gravity adds up to be significant, while E&M tends to cancel out.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Native

    Native Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,570
    Ratings:
    +493
    Religion:
    Natural Perceptions
    This is a theoretical nonsense. The two polarities in EM logically, evidently and dynamically supplement each other.
    More gravity nonsense as it´s the very E&M powers which binds all atoms together in your planets and stars.
     
  5. gnostic

    gnostic The Lost One

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    17,529
    Ratings:
    +5,076
    Religion:
    Pi π
    The main purpose of CERN and its LHC, have everything to with testing Quantum Mechanics (or Quantum Field Theory, QFT) and the Standard Model of particle physics, and very little to do with General Relativity.

    Attempts to unify both General Relativity and Quantum Field Theory, has so far being elusive, mainly because GR are most tested through observations of large structures with high masses...

    ...So observatories (Sloan Digital Sky Survery, Submillimeter Array, etc) and space observatories (Hubble, Spitzer, WMAP, etc) are far more useful to the study of astronomical objects and GR.

    I will look forward to operation of newer space-probe, that is expected to launch later this year, the James Webb Space Telescope.
     
  6. Native

    Native Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,570
    Ratings:
    +493
    Religion:
    Natural Perceptions
    The purpose of CERN is a huge idiotic waste of energy, time and economical resources. Its only value is the invention of the WWW.
     
  7. gnostic

    gnostic The Lost One

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    17,529
    Ratings:
    +5,076
    Religion:
    Pi π
    No, Native.

    They become neutral (no charge), when they are together. They are also held together by weak nuclear force.

    And since atoms larger than hydrogen atom, have 2 (eg helium) or more protons within its nuclei, these positive charged particles you would expect - should repulse each other, but they don’t, because of strong nuclear force, hold them all together.
     
  8. Native

    Native Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,570
    Ratings:
    +493
    Religion:
    Natural Perceptions
    And it´s all the EM force at work with different charges, frequensies and ranges and acting with either an overall attractive or repulsive motion in a certain situation.

    You logically can´t separate the principles in the EM force into several E&M forces.
     
    #68 Native, Mar 2, 2021
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2021
  9. gnostic

    gnostic The Lost One

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    17,529
    Ratings:
    +5,076
    Religion:
    Pi π
    To test the proposed explanatory models to determine what are true and false, hence verification of the scientific theories, to further KNOWLEDGE and EDUCATION, are priceless endeavors.

    It is lot better way to spend money, than to spend money making more powerful weapons for wars. Military spendings in the US and Russia dwarfed spending in science.

    Just as wasteful, is the money given to and spent on the CIA.
     
  10. Native

    Native Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,570
    Ratings:
    +493
    Religion:
    Natural Perceptions
    At least agreed in this but in order to understand cosmos CERN is a waste in all accounts.
     
  11. gnostic

    gnostic The Lost One

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    17,529
    Ratings:
    +5,076
    Religion:
    Pi π
    No, they aren’t the same. They are separate forces.

    Weak and strong nuclear forces are separate forces to the EM force.

    It is very late, so good night.
     
  12. gnostic

    gnostic The Lost One

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    17,529
    Ratings:
    +5,076
    Religion:
    Pi π
    No, education is priceless.

    And that can only happen if you can verify the knowledge being true, and get rid of false theories.

    The Electric Universe Model is a false model, untested and untestable. Electric Universe is pseudoscience trash.
     
  13. Native

    Native Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,570
    Ratings:
    +493
    Religion:
    Natural Perceptions
    Stop believing in the standard dogmatism - Good Night and Sweet Dreams.
     
  14. Native

    Native Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,570
    Ratings:
    +493
    Religion:
    Natural Perceptions
    Congratulations! You´ve just cancelled what is said about the EM forces which you otherwise referred to. Nice logics :)
     
  15. Polymath257

    Polymath257 Think & Care
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    19,598
    Ratings:
    +22,933
    Religion:
    Non-theist
    No, it is NOT theoretical nonsense. It is actually measured and verified fact.

    You like to dismiss everything as nonsense that shows your ideas are wrong. The fact that actual observations contradict your claims seems to be irrelevant to you.
     
  16. Polymath257

    Polymath257 Think & Care
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Messages:
    19,598
    Ratings:
    +22,933
    Religion:
    Non-theist
    Not at all. E&M is a well established collection of ideas. There are any number of excellent textbooks going over the theory and applications of those ideas.

    The EU, on the other hand, ignores all the facts we know about E&M and goes off into loony land.
     
  17. gnostic

    gnostic The Lost One

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    17,529
    Ratings:
    +5,076
    Religion:
    Pi π
    No, I didn’t “canceled” EM forces. Just the Electric Universe cosmology that you believe in, isn’t a scientific theory.

    You claimed that light and EM forces create and control everything, without the need of gravitation interaction, of weak nuclear interactions, and of strong nuclear interactions. Everything...:

    • from the elementary particles (eg quarks into hadron particles and meson particles) to the atomic matters (eg nuclei together with protons, neutrons),
    • the things (EM forces, without strong & weak nuclear forces),
    • that keep all objects Earth-bound without gravity (eg what cause objects to fall),
    • create Earth tides without gravitation,
    • cause the planetary rotations and keep planetary objects orbiting around a star,
    • that light cause heat and sunlight shining without the needs of nuclear fusion in the star core (hence, Stellar Nucleosynthesis),
    • EM forces are the only forces to cause the rotation of galactic spiral arms, without gravitation,
    • etc, etc, etc
    If the Electric Universe Model was true, then you should be able to supply all the observational and experimental evidence and data that back up all these known phenomena listed above, WITH ONLY EQUATIONS OF THE EM FORCES.

    @Polymath257, @TagliatelliMonster and @joelr have all asked you to present mathematical equations of EM of these and observations that verify your em equations and support EU model, but you haven’t presented any that can justify and verify EU cosmology.

    Without the evidence supporting your EM equations, then Electric Universe isn’t scientific, it is pseudoscience.
     
    #77 gnostic, Mar 2, 2021
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2021
    • Like Like x 1
  18. Native

    Native Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,570
    Ratings:
    +493
    Religion:
    Natural Perceptions
    Apparently some posts are lost or deleted in the thread. I was about to give a reply to Polymath257 but I cannot find his relevant post anymore.
     
    #78 Native, Mar 3, 2021
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2021
  19. Native

    Native Free Natural Philosopher & Comparative Mythologist

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,570
    Ratings:
    +493
    Religion:
    Natural Perceptions
    I know, you´ve read so and of course you believe this without giving the EU an independent thougth at all.
    Correct.
    Where did you get that from? You´re skewing my statement. I said:
    That is: In the Electric Universe, there is just the very principle of electromagnetism: Electric currents which induces magnetic fields, which induces electric currents which induces magnetic fields, which induces electric currents which induces magnetic fields etc etc.

    It´s all the principle EM force at work with different charges, frequensies and ranges and acting with either an overall attractive or repulsive motion in a certain situation of formation.

    If you and @Polymath257, @TagliatelliMonster and @joelr are seriously interested in the EU, you all can do your own homework.

    Just get rid of "Newton´s superstitious two body gravity model" and use the EM calculations everywhere in cosmos.
     
  20. TagliatelliMonster

    TagliatelliMonster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2019
    Messages:
    9,573
    Ratings:
    +7,430
    Religion:
    Atheist
    Our only "homework" concerning a claim that YOU make, is to ask you to present YOUR homework.
    Once you do that, our "homework" becomes reviewing that which you present.


    We don't understand how to do that.
    You apparently do.

    Please explain it to us.
     
    • Like Like x 1
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...