Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm fine with their being killed.
The problem lies in the process of identifying them.
It's been fraught with error & corruption.
So I wouldn't give government that power.
Capital punishment simply does not deter crime as the stats show, plus it's based on a false premise that a murderer cannot be reformed. IOW, two wrongs don't make a right.
We don't stop using safe standards just because accidents could still happen.I think some mistakes are fine
We don''t stop making a house because it might collapse and kill us.
I totally agree. One more bad feature of the death penalty, it is irreversible and I have no idea how many executions actually punished the wrong individual.Capital punishment simply does not deter crime as the stats show, plus it's based on a false premise that a murderer cannot be reformed. IOW, two wrongs don't make a right.
Then the reality is that he would then be no more moral than the killer since it would be a totally unnecessary act because there are far less brutal alternatives with our jails & prisons.The goal for it is justice, if someone killed me I hope my daddy would carry out as he has said and get him back
Exactly, and I remember an FBI estimate that about one in ten convictions are actually false convictions, and some states banned executions for that exact same reason, and the first state to do that is my state of Michigan.I totally agree. One more bad feature of the death penalty, it is irreversible and I have no idea how many executions actually punished the wrong individual.
We don't stop using safe standards just because accidents could still happen.
Death penalty:
- More expensive than life in prison
- Irreversible
- Not a deterrent
- Judicial errors & corruption go undetected after execution.
Life in prison :
- Cheaper than death penalty
- When corruption &/or incompetence in judicial process
are found, prisoner can be re-tried. Many have been
released after being found not guilty.
- Incentive to discover corruption &/or incompetence in
judicial process encourages reform.
Ref...
https://scholarlycommons.susqu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=supr
Even if it were cheaper, the other factors matter greatly to me.It can be made cheaper, and the rest of those I don't think are that big tbh
It can be made cheaper, and the rest of those I don't think are that big tbh
Even if it were cheaper, the other factors matter greatly to me.
We're just considering costs.Making it cheaper would of course result in even more errors than there are currently.
I don’t see how that is possible. The reason it is the more expensive option has to do with court costs and legal fees. Multiple appeals and multiple lawyer, and all at the expense of the State (people on death row are never wealthy).We're just considering costs.
Not proposing making it cheaper by cutting corners with people's rights.
As I recall, I only addressed life in prisonI don’t see how that is possible. The reason it is the more expensive option has to do with court costs and legal fees. Multiple appeals and multiple lawyer, and all at the expense of the State (people on death row are never wealthy).
Where do you imagine the savings would come from?