If one has survived, then in some aspect he is stronger than one who failed to survive.
Obviously, the fittest to survive is the strongest. So, the survival
of the most suitable to stay alive is the survival of the strongest.
Not only muscles (but physical and mental health, social and
individual skills/abilities) constitute the entire range of
strength of a person: "And from the days of John the
Baptist until now the Kingdom of Heaven is being taken by strength"
Matthew 11:12.
There is spiritual, mental stronghold I am talking about:
Does the Theory of Evolution talk about the strongest's survival
or the strongest's development? The original Theory of Evolution
talked about the survival of the strongest. Still, the modern theory of
Evolution (synthetic one) is only about development; and
the faster people die, the quicker and better development is.
Darwin's original iteration was the same as today's? No.
Originally was Theory of Darwin, Darwinian Evolution.
Now it is Synthetical Theory of Evolution.
The focus of the idea "man form ape" was changed.
Originally, the theory was nobel: life is fight for survival, and the winning qualities (like love, compassion, strength, health, long life) are passing to the coming generations.
Now, the theory became changed: the generation must die (through wars, through COVID 19, through hatred, abortions, and change of sex) to make us like bacteria or cockroaches with shortest possible lifespan. To make the development faster and better.
Did you say that such a trait is being selected that allows an organism to raise more kids? It is PRO-LIFE definition. Look: the old Theory of Evolution was PRO-Life, now the new Theory of Evolution is PRO-"Choice".
Why doesn't the Theory of Evolution through Selection extend the
average lifespan?
The theory of Evolution does not extend life. Nevertheless, it
teaches how to survive. Is this inconsistency hypocritical? Long
life contributes to survival - personal and collective survival.
Is long life and immortality not the goal of Evolution?
On the contrary, the only value is the speed of generational change.
Look at the bacilli or cockroaches. By quickly dying, they quickly
adapt to any poison specially invented for them. It was the death
that appeared in the course of Evolution.
You know, it seems to me that your almost monomaniacal obsession with evolution may be the subliminal result of a very terrifying fear: in fact, I think that perhaps many fundamentalist and evangelical Christians might share this terrifying fear .....
I have this niggling suspicion that it may not be so much a fear that God didn't make everything just as it is -- most people get by that one easily enough. It's not even the fear that we might be "animals" rather than some special being outside of natural creation. No, I think it might be the fear that (gasp!) we may have ancestors who were BLACK!
And here's the truth, that evolution tells us. Yes, we all do.
Organisms naturally die? Here is the problem. In heaven there is invisible to light Dark Matter, on Earth - invisible to eyes Angel of Death -- the murderer.
The reality can regulate the amount of people without using Angel of Death. Each time one makes abortion, the Angel of Death comes into operation room. The reality without Death is having varying rate of the births. The varying birth rate is natural mechanism of God. It is not needed to change sex (castrate) a person. He simply will not decide to get involved in sexual activity, if God is against it.
The monks. The monks are not making babies, but the monks are neither homosexual nor transsexuals. So, no need in assistance of the Angel of Death. He is also Angel of sin.