• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Christians Who Attempt to Regulate Morality

osgart

Nothing my eye, Something for sure
Well in the context of how everyone should treat everybody else there is a common moral ground between all.

But there is also individual moralities and consciences that harm no one, and are different from group to group, person to person. And they should be respected.

Christianity has a one truth fits all system. They are certainly free to practice it for themselves, they are free to warn people civilly. But they have no right to enforce it because its not on common moral ground with everybody else then them. It is an individual's chosen morality being christian.
 
Last edited:

Earthling

David Henson
Are they committing trespass against their neighbor?

If their neighbor isn't Christian, yes, IMO, they are. Christians who bomb abortion clinics, protest soldier's funerals, or homosexuals, or try and influence legislature according to their religious convictions, are, IMO committing trespass against their neighbors and Christianity itself. Now, when they are warning their fellow Christians of breaches in morality in accordance with scripture, no. Or discussing what the Bible says on a forum like this, no.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
There are some who are to me the same as the Islamic terrorists who want to impose their beliefs on everyone because they are utterly convinced that God wants them to do this. Fortunately the vast majority are not such fanatics.
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
All laws reflect a type of morality

there are some behaviors that directly effect us and some that indirectly effect us. those that directly effect us are our business. those that don't directly effect us aren't any of our business unless we are asked to defend someone against assault. Or advocate for the poor and needy.

some are within the scope of the law and are a law unto themselves. some want to control, or power over others but then they want the government to keep their hands off of themselves and their behavior of controlling what someone else should/shouldn't be doing..


Lao-Tzu’s claim that “the more laws one makes, the more criminals one creates” is the antithesis of Confucius’s assertion that more laws make better citizens.
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
there are some behaviors that directly effect us and some that indirectly effect us. those that directly effect us are our business. those that don't directly effect us aren't any of our business unless we are asked to defend someone against assault. Or advocate for the poor and needy.

some are within the scope of the law and are a law unto themselves. some want to control, or power over others but then they want the government to keep their hands off of themselves and their behavior of controlling what someone else should/shouldn't be doing..


Lao-Tzu’s claim that “the more laws one makes, the more criminals one creates” is the antithesis of Confucius’s assertion that more laws make better citizens.


Why do you suppose Democrats make more laws than Republicans
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
Laws (outside of religion) exist to maintain justice and order, which are necessary social components, thus deal with things of real world consequence. The arbitrary hocus pocus of religious laws fall outside of this.

Actually no.... rights to property, marriage, family... significant overlap
see 10 commandments
 

stvdv

Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
Interesting quotes you have here. Were both great thinkers. Seems to contradict. Or should we look a little deeper maybe?
1): “the more laws one makes, the more criminals one creates”: That is pure logic. More laws then easier to break; breaking=criminal, so more criminals are created
2): "more laws make better citizens": Makes sense also. MoreLaws=MoreCriminals=Full-Jail, so remaining=LessCitizens BUT all are Law-abiding Citizen = BetterCitizen
 
Last edited:

PureX

Veteran Member
Why do you all think so many Christians do this? Especially in voting for parties, politicians, and judges that they believe are biased so that they can force their beliefs on the public through the power of civil law. Why do so many Christians disregard the beliefs of others and the ideals of a free and democratic society so automatically and presumptively?
 
Last edited:

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Actually no.... rights to property, marriage, family... significant overlap
see 10 commandments

10 commandments do contain some obvious no-brainers (no killing, stealing, etc.) but these are hardly original or exclusive to the Bible. Also, if the rest of the 10 commandments were the basis of modern law, then capitalism would be illegal (no coveting), working on Sunday would be illegal (keep sabbath holy), no child protective services (honor mother and father), non judeochristian faiths would be illegal, as would be the pledge of allegiance (no "idols"), the republican party would be outlawed :D (no lying), etc.
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
Interesting quotes you have here. Were both great thinkers. Seems to contradict. Or should we look a little deeper maybe?
1): “the more laws one makes, the more criminals one creates”: That is pure logic. More laws then easier to break; breaking=criminal, so more criminals are created
2): "more laws make better citizens": Makes sense also. MoreLaws=MoreCriminals=FullJail, so remaining=LessCitizens BUT well following all laws = BetterCitizen
sometimes you have to write it out in black and white; which makes it official for everyone.

but criminalizing adult conscious behavior, that doesn't directly effect others, is criminal in itself.
 
Well in the context of how everyone should treat everybody else there is a common moral ground between all.

But there is also individual moralities and consciences that harm no one, and are different from group to group, person to person. And they should be respected.

Christianity has a one truth fits all system. They are certainly free to practice it for themselves, they are free to warn people civilly. But they have no right to enforce it because its not on common moral ground with everybody else then them. It is an individual's chosen morality being christian.


Additionally, there is no certainty in any religious belief so superstitions about such things as sexual practices between consenting adults cannot be subjected to assumption of certainty that is just not there.
 
Top