Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Are they committing trespass against their neighbor?
Are they committing trespass against their neighbor?
yeah....for it is written somewhere.....Are they committing trespass against their neighbor?
Are they committing trespass against their neighbor?
I would focus more on the hypocrisy of such things. They do it but they don't want their neighbor to.Are they committing trespass against their neighbor?
A morality that sets out to harm others for no rational objective reason doesn't deserve to be called morality.All laws reflect a type of morality
All laws reflect a type of morality
there are some behaviors that directly effect us and some that indirectly effect us. those that directly effect us are our business. those that don't directly effect us aren't any of our business unless we are asked to defend someone against assault. Or advocate for the poor and needy.
some are within the scope of the law and are a law unto themselves. some want to control, or power over others but then they want the government to keep their hands off of themselves and their behavior of controlling what someone else should/shouldn't be doing..
Lao-Tzu’s claim that “the more laws one makes, the more criminals one creates” is the antithesis of Confucius’s assertion that more laws make better citizens.
All laws reflect a type of morality
Laws (outside of religion) exist to maintain justice and order, which are necessary social components, thus deal with things of real world consequence. The arbitrary hocus pocus of religious laws fall outside of this.
Interesting quotes you have here. Were both great thinkers. Seems to contradict. Or should we look a little deeper maybe?
Actually no.... rights to property, marriage, family... significant overlap
see 10 commandments
Why do you suppose Democrats make more laws than Republicans
sometimes you have to write it out in black and white; which makes it official for everyone.Interesting quotes you have here. Were both great thinkers. Seems to contradict. Or should we look a little deeper maybe?
1): “the more laws one makes, the more criminals one creates”: That is pure logic. More laws then easier to break; breaking=criminal, so more criminals are created
2): "more laws make better citizens": Makes sense also. MoreLaws=MoreCriminals=FullJail, so remaining=LessCitizens BUT well following all laws = BetterCitizen
Well in the context of how everyone should treat everybody else there is a common moral ground between all.
But there is also individual moralities and consciences that harm no one, and are different from group to group, person to person. And they should be respected.
Christianity has a one truth fits all system. They are certainly free to practice it for themselves, they are free to warn people civilly. But they have no right to enforce it because its not on common moral ground with everybody else then them. It is an individual's chosen morality being christian.
Why?Christianity has a one truth fits all system.
Why?
Does anyone have any idea why this is?
Judaism does not follow this concept. Neither do Hinduism, Buddhism, or even Islam. So why is Christianity so peculiar in this way?