Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm just curious then, Khale, are loving, compassionate Muslims Christians? Are loving, compassionate Hindus Christians? Are loving, compassionate atheists Christians? I see what you're getting at, but a lot of people demonstrate many of the qualities Christ exemplified without believing that He was the Son of God. That kind of sounds to me as if you're saying that all good people should be called Christians.To be a Christian I don't think you even need to believe in the divinity of Jesus. You simply need to follow his example of compassion and love.
Of course I do.You don't think it's important to resist Satan?
Of course trying to avoid sin is a personal thing for me.Is not trying to avoid sin a personal thing for you, or is this an LDS concept?
Hebrews 12:1 Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles, and let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us. 2 Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy set before him endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. 3 Consider him who endured such opposition from sinful men, so that you will not grow weary and lose heart.
If something hinders you in becoming a better person, by all means throw it off. Just don't assume that the same things that hinder you hinder me.
Maybe I don't even understand what you're getting at, Pete. Maybe that's my problem.Or maybe, you don't see legalism as a sin?
I Corinthians 8:1 We know that we all possess knowledge. Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up. 2 The man who thinks he knows something does not yet know as he ought to know. 3 But the man who loves God is known by God.
Again, you lost me. Are you saying that knowledge is a sin?
Well it beats the anal myopia of following others so closely and without question that your nose is up their butt!Except that one can become so myopic in "resisting Satan" that one forgets to focus the vision on God.
You just don't get it. The Pharisees had this to the MAX. I can't believe that you would exchange the FREEDOM found in Christ for another set of man made rules!Part of that learning involves the ritual and structure that you seem to disparage in your posts. Organized, structured, and ritualized worship, baptism, communion, and confession (among other disciplines) help us to learn the craft of forgiveness (and being forgiven) that is at the heart of Christian love.
What I say is of little consequence. The scripture says it rather nicely: Knowledge often leads to arrogance. Love is a far better way to deal with others.Again, you lost me. Are you saying that knowledge is a sin?
It's not me who misunderstands. When Paul railed against "the law", he wasn't saying that we ought to jettison standards for behavior or useful spiritual disciplines to train us in righteousness. He was saying that all people, Jews and Greeks alike, are counted as people of God not based on pedigree (descent from Abraham) or on the marks of circumcision, but on the basis of their confession of faith in Jesus. Having done that, we ought not to once again set the boundaries of the community of faith based on particular practices. Thus, the community of faith is defined not by adherence to Mosaic law (or to any other) but by commitment to Jesus. That is entirely compatible with that community setting forth standards of behavior and expecting its members to toe the line. It's also consistent with that community training itself with spiritual disciplines. Failure to engage in those spiritual disciplines is a recipe for license. And scripture tells us not to allow our freedom to become an excuse of licence.You just don't get it. The Pharisees had this to the MAX. I can't believe that you would exchange the FREEDOM found in Christ for another set of man made rules!
Failure to engage in those spiritual disciplines is a recipe for license. And scripture tells us not to allow our freedom to become an excuse of licence.
Now we are discussing the difference between "traditions" and "God's Law". Traditions of men are FINE as long as they are treated as TRADITIONS of men (non-binding). Unfortunately, they almost always grow in stature and importance and seem to ultimately REPLACE God's Laws for many denominations.It's also consistent with that community training itself with spiritual disciplines. Failure to engage in those spiritual disciplines is a recipe for license. And scripture tells us not to allow our freedom to become an excuse of licence.
Could you clarify what you mean by that?
Thanx
Now we are discussing the difference between "traditions" and "God's Law". Traditions of men are FINE as long as they are treated as TRADITIONS of men (non-binding). Unfortunately, they almost always grow in stature and importance and seem to ultimately REPLACE God's Laws for many denominations.
To that end, we see people waste time on justifying these traditions as being essential for the community as you are now doing. Our focus should be LOVE... not rules. I am going to keep that!
Certain traditions are essential. Communion and baptism and confession and forgiveness and all that are not optional. These things train us to love. I agree that love is the focus, the goal, the purpose of our lives.
But we need training to do that. The spiritual disciplines (call them "rules" if you like) cultivate love. If you ignore them, you may talk love, but you are not training yourself in it.
So they can't possibly replace love. But they are essential and therefore not negotiable.
Whoa! Hold everything! Are you saying that Christ died so that we would be free to do whatever we want?If we are not free to do what we want, then why did Christ die?
If we are not free to do what we want, then why did Christ die?
In short, a Christian life will take part in traditions because he/she wants to imitate the life of Christ, but this would not mean that they are required.
We do need training, but rules do not train people to love. Laws are here to expose our sin and keep us living a beneficial life. As Paul says all things are lawful, but not all things are helpful. I feel that the law directs us to the more helpful life, but it is our faith in Christ that breeds and trains the love. How could anything else?
Traditions are by definition NOT essential. They are only essential for those who wish to maintain power over the supplicants.Certain traditions are essential.
To be a Christian I don't think you even need to believe in the divinity of Jesus. You simply need to follow his example of compassion and love.
What about 2 Thess. 2:15 Pete?Traditions are by definition NOT essential. They are only essential for those who wish to maintain power over the supplicants.
I think where we run into trouble is not the concern that we practice these disciplines, but how we practice them.
In order to be a disciple, there sort of have to be disciplines, don't there?