Conclusion from most of comments, Islam is guilty !!! It's Islam fault !!!
That its doctrine does not really allow for eye-to-eye dialog with other doctrines?
Yes, it sure seems to me that it is Islaam's responsibility that it took that choice.
Do you disagree? I am ready to listen to your arguments on why.
Is Christianity ready tolerant and can reconcile some of faith to comply with Islam or only Islam that need to change to accept Christianity belief ?
That is a fair question. In practice, it seems to me that there is a whole spectrum of answers, depending on which Christian group one is looking at.
To be fair, to a significant extent that is a result of people generally demanding more of a reasonable stance from Christianity in recent centuries.
How much of it came from voluntary choice of Christianity itself is a matter of considerable debate and may easily be impossible to answer objectively.
Forget that @%#^%$ religion Islam for the time being....
What about Judaism ?
Both Judaism and Christianity are using the same Old Testimony. Who is the problem in this case, Judaism and/or Christianity ?
Judaism is monotheism and doesn't recognize Jesus-Christ as Al-Maseh
ohhhh, #%^#%^
What about them? They seem to be on fairly good terms currently.
Forget about Islam and Judaism for time being.
What about reconcile different Churches Orthodox, Romans, Protestant,,, they're all Trinitarian. What a surprise ?
Yes, and they are share the Old and New Testimony.
What about JW, Mormons, Unitarians, Evangelist,,,,
They are diverging doctrines that all claim some measure of common origin. They often disagree. But there is not really a whole lot of tension arising from that.
I have a hunch that you see that as significantly greater an issue than I do. To the best of my knowledge, the height of it comes from some Christians claiming that JW, Mormons and SDA are in some sense not really Christians.
That does not have a whole lot of consequence, nor should it.
We need to differentiate between to different reconciliations in religions in general not only Islam-Christianity:
- Theological Reconciliation :
- It's impossible and not needed. Previous trials failed. It's not needed
That is not always true, but I agree that it is not often needed, nor should it be necessary either.
- People Reconciliation :
- It exists.It's there in everywhere
- Except for some countries, groups, and persons
- These countries, groups, and persons in some cases are motivated by religion
And at the present time, it turns out that Islaam is very much remarkable as such a motivator.
I would be hard pressed to even recall such a group that does not consider itself Islaamic and is a significant worry as of now.
- These religion motivated entities are there in all regions
No, not really.
- These entities and incidents are condemned from majority of same beleif
With very significant exceptions. And also with the major complication that most Muslims seem to prefer to expect people to perceive those groups as somehow "obviously" not being Muslims...
That is definitely not helpful, either for resolving the situations nor for the overall reputation and merits of Islaam.
So, It's a global Christians against Muslims.
No, I don't think that is at all an accurate depiction of the current situation.
People need to work for peace not to wipe Islam and Quran
It would be nice to have clearer reasons and means to distinguish between the two goals.