• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Christian Salvation

TashaN

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Katzpur said:
Once again, that all depends upon whom you ask. I believe that baptism is a sacred ordinanace which must be performed by one authorized by God to do so. It must also be performed in a specific way.

hi Katzpur,

while reading your post some questions came up to my mind and i hope that you don't mind to answer me. (( Michel please don't give me a whole website to read because i prefer short answers to this rather than reading a huge passage about it :D )).

How do i know which one is the person whom God gave him/her the authority to do so (Baptize)?

Is anyone work in the church for example supposed to be authorized by God?

If one day i worked in the church as a christian can God choose me to Baptize and who will tell me whether i got the permission or not? The head of the church maybe will tell me that God accepted me or there is another way to know that?


Peace ... :)
 

ChrisP

Veteran Member
Good question. What would happen if you were the only person in the middle of nowhere, not a Christian to be seen, and you wanted to be baptised?
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
The Truth said:
How do i know which one is the person whom God gave him/her the authority to do so (Baptize)?
Hi, Truth.

I can give you one perspective and one alone -- mine. You will need to realize that different Christians see this matter differently.

When Jesus Christ was here on earth, He established His Church and organized it upon a specific foundation of Prophets and Apostles. He personally gave them the authority to baptize and perform other sacred ordinances. They also had the authority to ordain others to do this work. There are a number of places in the Bible where we are told that no one can simply take this authority upon himself. It can only be conferred upon someone by someone else who already holds it.

As a Latter-day Saint, I believe that this authority was lost shortly after the deaths of the Apostles and that the Church Christ established fell into Apostasy. For nearly two thousand years, the Church operated without this authority. Hence, the ordinances that were performed were not approved by God. I believe that this authority has since been restored to the earth, by Jesus Christ himself. And I believe that it is held today by Priesthood holders in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. So I guess that would be my answer.

Is anyone work in the church for example supposed to be authorized by God?
I'm not sure I understand you, so correct me if I've misunderstood your question. There are many, many things that members of Jesus Christ's Church can do without having been given specific authority. God shouldn't have to command or authorize anyone to serve others in any capacity possible. There are just certain things that require authority. There things as called "saving ordinances" or "sacraments."

If one day i worked in the church as a christian can God choose me to Baptize and who will tell me whether i got the permission or not? The head of the church maybe will tell me that God accepted me or there is another way to know that?
No. You would have to be a worthy member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, first of all. Simply working in the Church for a day would not be sufficient. You would have to have faith in Jesus Christ and in His power to atone for your sins, you would have to repent of your sins, be baptized by someone in authority, and be confirmed a member of the Church, thereby receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost. This, too, would have to be done by one having authority. You could then be ordained (by one who held the Melchizedek Priesthood) to the Aaronic Priesthood. This ordination would give you the authority to baptize.

The bottom line is that there is order in everything within Christ's Church.

Kathryn
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
SnaleSpace said:
Good question. What would happen if you were the only person in the middle of nowhere, not a Christian to be seen, and you wanted to be baptised?
I guess you'd wait until you were not the only person around, in the middle of nowhere, not a Christian to be seen. Then you would ask to be baptized. ;)
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
Cynic said:
Psychologically, a person's outwardly behavior can contradict their inner feelings and thoughts. In other words, you can "repent", but still not be repenting.[/quote

So, what is true repentance?
I see true repentence as originating in the heart and being demonstrated through one's behavior.

Next, what are you really being cleansed from? And if I have to keep on repenting because I sin continuously, then how was there any change?
There is only change to the extent that you want there to be change. Again, I think the condition of one's heart is the important thing. If there is sincere remorse for wrong-doing, one is less likely to repeat the offence in the future. This is not to say that there won't be times when we fall short of where we ultimately want to be, so repentence does have to be an on-going thing. Continued improvement, not instant success is what we need to strive for.
 

ChrisP

Veteran Member
Katzpur said:
I guess you'd wait until you were not the only person around, in the middle of nowhere, not a Christian to be seen. Then you would ask to be baptized. ;)
Patience is not a virtue I possess :D
 

Scott1

Well-Known Member
SnaleSpace said:
Good question. What would happen if you were the only person in the middle of nowhere, not a Christian to be seen, and you wanted to be baptised?
Your desire to be baptized would be sufficient.:)
 

Cynic

Well-Known Member
Katzpur said:
I see true repentence as originating in the heart and being demonstrated through one's behavior.
So how, besides feeling remorseful, is the heart and mind conditioned?

Why is all sin the same in God's eyes, whether it is a lie or a murder?

What does God look at when it comes to sin?

Do you think there may be similarities bewteen a lie and a murder?

Why are works worthless in God's eyes? Perhaps it's not the lying and murdering that makes sin a sin, but perhaps the motive or hidden agenda for doing them?

What if I told you the truth, but my motive was to hurt your feelings? What if I lied to you, but my motive was to keep you from being hurt?

Why was it taboo to eat the food offerings in the temple, yet it was okay when David and others ate the food from the temple?

Why did Jesus point out the false motives of the pharisees and sadacees?

Katzpur said:
There is only change to the extent that you want there to be change. Again, I think the condition of one's heart is the important thing. If there is sincere remorse for wrong-doing, one is less likely to repeat the offence in the future. This is not to say that there won't be times when we fall short of where we ultimately want to be, so repentence does have to be an on-going thing. Continued improvement, not instant success is what we need to strive for.
If there is no change, then whats the point? If I felt remorseful because I cheated on my girlfriend, but I still cheated on her continuously, what is the point?

Also I think that in order to change, you have to understand what it is about yourself that you are changing.

That leads to my next question. What is it that you are changing?
 

TashaN

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Katzpur said:
I'm not sure I understand you, so correct me if I've misunderstood your question. There are many, many things that members of Jesus Christ's Church can do without having been given specific authority. God shouldn't have to command or authorize anyone to serve others in any capacity possible. There are just certain things that require authority. There things as called "saving ordinances" or "sacraments."

No. You would have to be a worthy member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, first of all. Simply working in the Church for a day would not be sufficient. You would have to have faith in Jesus Christ and in His power to atone for your sins, you would have to repent of your sins, be baptized by someone in authority, and be confirmed a member of the Church and given the gift of the Holy Ghost. This, too, would have to be done by one having authority. You could then be ordained (by one who held the Melchizedek Priesthood) to the Aaronic Priesthood. This ordination would give you the authority to baptize.

The bottom line is that there is order in everything within Christ's Church.

Kathryn

Thanks alot ... :)
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
Cynic said:
So how, besides feeling remorseful, is the heart and mind conditioned?
I'd say remorse would have to be coupled with a commitment to do better in the future.

Why is all sin the same in God's eyes, whether it is a lie or a murder?
I don't believe it is. Other Christians may.

What does God look at when it comes to sin?
I'm not exactly sure what you mean. I believe that God would take virtually everything He could into consideration. I realize that's a vague answer, but I'm not quite following your line of thinking. Could you be more specific?

Do you think there may be similarities bewteen a lie and a murder?
I suppose so. Both would generally involve disregard for someone else's rights and feelings.

Why are works worthless in God's eyes? Perhaps it's not the lying and murdering that makes sin a sin, but perhaps the motive or hidden agenda for doing them?
Again, I don't think works are worthless in God's eyes. I believe they are a critical component for salvation. And I agree that motive would be one of the things God considers when looking at sin (if that's what you were getting at in your previous question).

What if I told you the truth, but my motive was to hurt your feelings? What if I lied to you, but my motive was to keep you from being hurt?
I don't think God sees everything in black and white, but in shades of gray. Does that answer your question?

Why was it taboo to eat the food offerings in the temple, yet it was okay when David and others ate the food from the temple?
I have no idea. Sorry, I can't help you on this one.

Why did Jesus point out the false motives of the pharisees and sadacees?
Because, as I said up front, the condition of one's heart counts for a lot with God.

If there is no change, then whats the point? If I felt remorseful because I cheated on my girlfriend, but I still cheated on her continuously, what is the point?
There would be no point. That's why remorse, in and of itself, is only half of what's required of us.

Also I think that in order to change, you have to understand what it is about yourself that you are changing.
Absolutely.

That leads to my next question. What is it that you are changing?
The condition of your heart and, as the result of a sincere change, your behavior.
 

joeboonda

Well-Known Member
Cynic said:
How does a non-christian become saved through accepting Jesus? Can someone simply say that they accept Jesus, and then become saved?
Acts 16:30-31...Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved...

Did you hear the good news? Do you believe Jesus Christ is the Son of God who died for all the sins of the world and rose again three days later? Are you willing to trust in what he did on the cross, that it is true, that he paid for your sins? Are you willing to accept it as a totally free gift? (Rom. 5:16-18, Eph. 2:8-9)

Then believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou SHALT be saved!

John 6:47 Verily, verily I say unto thee, He that believeth on me HATH everlasting life.
 

Cynic

Well-Known Member
Katzpur said:
I'd say remorse would have to be coupled with a commitment to do better in the future.

Katzpur said:
I don't believe it is. Other Christians may.
Hmmm. Well I heard this somewhere, but It doesn't seem to say so in the bible.

Katzpur said:
I'm not exactly sure what you mean. I believe that God would take virtually everything He could into consideration. I realize that's a vague answer, but I'm not quite following your line of thinking. Could you be more specific?
Katzpur said:
I suppose so. Both would generally involve disregard for someone else's rights and feelings.
What if I lied to you because I didn't want to hurt your feelings?

Katzpur said:
Again, I don't think works are worthless in God's eyes. I believe they are a critical component for salvation. And I agree that motive would be one of the things God considers when looking at sin (if that's what you were getting at in your previous question).
I think Paul says something about works being worth little. It's been a while since I've read the bible. I'll try to look this up later to make sure.

Katzpur said:
I don't think God sees everything in black and white, but in shades of gray. Does that answer your question?.
So it's not immoral if I told you the truth, but my intentions were to hurt your feelings?

Katzpur said:
I have no idea. Sorry, I can't help you on this one.
Do you think that it was justified, because of the motives for doing so?

Katzpur said:
Because, as I said up front, the condition of one's heart counts for a lot with God.
But what made their fasting in front of everyone, praying, (good works) wrong? Maybe it was the reason, or motive for doing them? They did those works because they loved being praised.

Why does Jesus tell others not to pray or fast as the pharisees did, but to do it in privacy?

Katzpur said:
There would be no point. That's why remorse, in and of itself, is only half of what's required of us... Absolutely... The condition of your heart and, as the result of a sincere change, your behavior.
What is it, about your heart, that you are changing or conditioning?

Anyways, I'll get to my point. I think it would be better by pulling out the bible, but I'm gonna have to do a little reading first.
 

Malus 12:9

Temporarily Deactive.
Katzpur said:
As a Latter-day Saint, I believe that this authority was lost shortly after the deaths of the Apostles and that the Church Christ established fell into Apostasy.
So therefore all the previous Archbishops and Popes have been rendered useless in your opinion Katz person?

Katzpur said:
For nearly two thousand years, the Church operated without this authority.
SO, how did Jesus "restore" this authority? Did he approach a specific indivisual and say "Okay dude, you may have the authority now, start new"?
 

Uncertaindrummer

Active Member
I think Paul says something about works being worth little. It's been a while since I've read the bible. I'll try to look this up later to make sure
Paul never says anything of the sort, although he does say we cannot be saved by works of the law. This is put into context though by James assertion that we are not saved by Faith alone. Paul does teach that works cannot save us--they can't--but then again neither can. We need God's grace, Faith and Works. We can't get by on just one or two.

As for the topic: Jesus says not everyone who cries "Lord Lord" will be saved, but only those who do the will of the Father. So how can one claim that those who cry "Lord Lord" (i.e. just believing in Jesus) will be saved?
 

Melody

Well-Known Member
Cynic said:
Why is all sin the same in God's eyes, whether it is a lie or a murder?
Because whether a lie or murder, it separates us from God and separation from God is death.


Cynic said:
Do you think there may be similarities bewteen a lie and a murder?
Yes...lies can destroy lives just as completely as a murder can. Sometimes murder would have been more merciful (in my opinion).

Cynic said:
Why are works worthless in God's eyes?
Works are not worthless. Works without faith are worthless.

Cynic said:
Perhaps it's not the lying and murdering that makes sin a sin, but perhaps the motive or hidden agenda for doing them? What if I told you the truth, but my motive was to hurt your feelings? What if I lied to you, but my motive was to keep you from being hurt?
I can only go by what the Bible teaches. A lie is a lie.

Cynic said:
Why was it taboo to eat the food offerings in the temple, yet it was okay when David and others ate the food from the temple?
I'm not a bible scholar but was David considered a priest of the temple? I read something that said some of the food offerings were for the temple priests store and some were to be eaten by those offering the food.

Cynic said:
Why did Jesus point out the false motives of the pharisees and sadacees?[\quote]

Since it seems obvious that it was a lesson on hypocrisy, perhaps I'm misunderstanding your question?

Cynic said:
If there is no change, then whats the point? If I felt remorseful because I cheated on my girlfriend, but I still cheated on her continuously, what is the point?
Also I think that in order to change, you have to understand what it is about yourself that you are changing.
I'm sure others will disagree with me, but if you truly accept Christ and repent, you wouldn't be able to cheat on her "continuously" as this seems to imply no remorse when you do. God will convict you. I can honestly say that since I accepted Christ I have sinned. I am not perfect....but everytime I do sin, I am immediately filled with remorse and stopped in my tracks.

Cynic said:
That leads to my next question. What is it that you are changing?
I am not changing anything. God is. He is creating a clean heart in me.
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
Cynic said:
Hmmm. Well I heard this somewhere, but It doesn't seem to say so in the bible.
"Christians" tell you a lot of things that aren't in the Bible, Cynic. You can't believe everything you hear.

What if I lied to you because I didn't want to hurt your feelings? So it's not immoral if I told you the truth, but my intentions were to hurt your feelings? Do you think that it was justified, because of the motives for doing so?
I'm not sure if you're trying to trip me up or what. :confused: It's not up to me to decide what's moral and/or justified and what isn't. But, as I said before, I believe that God does not see all of our actions as either black or white. I'm afraid I don't see why that's so hard to understand.

I think Paul says something about works being worth little. It's been a while since I've read the bible. I'll try to look this up later to make sure.
Good works done for the wrong reason probably are worth little. Even when done for the right reason, our good works are insufficient to save us.

But what made their fasting in front of everyone, praying, (good works) wrong? Maybe it was the reason, or motive for doing them? They did those works because they loved being praised.
You got it.

Why does Jesus tell others not to pray or fast as the pharisees did, but to do it in privacy?
For the reason you just stated.

What is it, about your heart, that you are changing or conditioning?
Love for your fellow man.

Anyways, I'll get to my point. I think it would be better by pulling out the bible, but I'm gonna have to do a little reading first.
Sounds good to me. I'll watch for your next response.

Kathryn
 

Cynic

Well-Known Member
Katzpur said:
"Christians" tell you a lot of things that aren't in the Bible, Cynic. You can't believe everything you hear.
I Know.


Katzpur said:
I'm not sure if you're trying to trip me up or what. :confused: It's not up to me to decide what's moral and/or justified and what isn't. But, as I said before, I believe that God does not see all of our actions as either black or white. I'm afraid I don't see why that's so hard to understand.
Not at all.

Katzpur said:
Good works done for the wrong reason probably are worth little. Even when done for the right reason, our good works are insufficient to save us.
Because the work, the action, can contradict what a person truely thinks or feels (Their agenda). When determining the integrity of a person, such things become unreliable.

The Pharisees fasted for themselves. Not for God, not for anybody else. Their motive/agenda/cause was based on self interest.

Now if you analyze the agendas of biblical characters, you may notice a pattern. All sin apparently seems to be motivated by self interest. When You analyze Jesus, his agendas are spotless. Nothing he did seemed motivated by self interest.

A Selfish heart / A Selfless heart

The reason why a person does something, reflects their integrity on a profound level, wherease the work/action can be contradictive and therefore unreliable in determining the integrity of a person.

If a person accepts Jesus, so they can get into heaven, then they're not accepting Jesus for Jesus, not for anybody else, they're doing it for themselves. Ever see the movie Constantine?

A selfless heart becomes morally sound, because the person is not driven by the ego and by their own selfish/emotional needs. Rather they are concerned by the needs of others and are driven by loving kindness.

Katzpur said:
You got it... For the reason you just stated.
Katzpur said:
Love for your fellow man.
You can love someone selfishly. Love then becomes currupted (fake, untrue).

"18 But those things which proceed out of the mouth come from the heart, and they defile a man. 19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies.20 These are the things which defile a man, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man." - Mathews 15:18-20 NKJ

18 So He said to them, "Are you thus without understanding also? Do you not perceive that whatever enters a man from outside cannot defile him, 19 because it does not enter his heart but his stomach, and is eliminated, thus purifying all foods?" 20 And He said, "What comes out of a man, that defiles a man. 21 For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, 22 thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lewdness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness. 23 All these evil things come from within and defile a man." - Mark 18-23 NKJ

What I am getting at is the fact that all these things: "evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lewdness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness", describes a person who lives for themselves in selfishness, with some to little concern for others. All these things, branch off from a selfish heart with selfish motives. It's narcissism. So when a person repents, what are they really repenting from? From the sins alone, or also from having a selfish heart with wrong motives, which is a major contributer to committing a sin? Evil, from what Jesus says, seems to originate from the heart. What makes a sin sinful, despite breaking some law? what makes it wrong on a rational level?

Melody said:
I can only go by what the Bible teaches. A lie is a lie.
Sure a lie is a lie, but can the motive determine whether if a lie is justifiable? What if I had to lie, in order to save your life? What if I had to kill someone, in order to protect you and your family? Then what if I killed someone for their wallet?

Katzpur said:
Sounds good to me. I'll watch for your next response.

Kathryn
I was busy in the past couple of days because I had to be a DJ for a community event (+ I also took a break from RF), but I'll try to piece together what I'm trying to say with certain scripture.
 

Cynic

Well-Known Member
I've noticed that no one has further replied since my absense. Are my statements something already obvious, does anybody have objections towards my arguement?

So salvation is belief in Jesus, doing good works, and also because of God's grace, baptism and repentance.
 
Top