Charlie Hebdo Muslim hypocrisy still not cured

[ChristineM]

This proves that Atheism was not even there around 1550, because they had a definition that has nothing to do with Atheism

When was the "real" definition of Atheism given, that would be the real start of Atheism

Ancient greece

 

[stvdv]

Germany? Nope, both Hittler and his masses were predominantly Christian

Your post reminds me of our friend @PopeADope
He was also good of giving us some history lessons
He was also amazing in providing wonderful pictures

 

[stvdv]

I thought it was in there, i do know about it, i must have opened an old list.

I checked the list yesterday, but could not find it. They did mention that it was left out of history books

I did see a Jewish site where it was also mentioned, but this information was taken out
I did see quite a few links about this Holocaust that were not working anymore now
Seems there are people who still like to hide these horrors done in Allah's name
(Maybe happened during Obama Rule...they can easily delete anything)

 

[Revoltingest]

So Muslim countries and western countries are the same because we punish apostates, even putting them to death.

I disagree.

 

[stvdv]

So Muslim countries and western countries are the same because we punish apostates, even putting them to death.

Which Western country punish apostates and put them to death for abandoning their belief?

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I disagree.

So how are the condition in Muslim countries relevant to terrorism in Western countries.

Consider Islamic countries wherein it's not just those wrestling
with psychological issues, but even the government who will
punish apostates, even putting them to death.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Which Western country punish apostates and put them to death for abandoning their belief?

No, they don't. But go backwards in the exchange and consider how come I posted it.

 

[Revoltingest]

So how are the condition in Muslim countries relevant to terrorism in Western countries.

As an answer to your request for evidence, they point
to Islam itself being the problem with Muslims tolerating
western values, rather than psychological issues with
individuals.
This is the 2nd time I've answered the same question.
Please read carefully.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

As an answer to your request for evidence, they point
to Islam itself being the problem with Muslims tolerating
western values, rather than psychological issues with
individuals.
This is the 2nd time I've answered the same question.
Please read carefully.

I properly missed something so okay.

 

[Tambourine]

The violent ones, I think.

Does the Prime Minister of Pakistan have a reputation for being violent?

 

[Tambourine]

Ancient greece

Atheismos in ancient Greece was a definition for a criminal offense, not for a metaphysical position.

 

[ChristineM]

Atheismos in ancient Greece was a definition for a criminal offense, not for a metaphysical position.

I said "a theos"

 

[stvdv]

No, they don't. But go backwards in the exchange and consider how come I posted it.

I did already before I gave the previous reply, but it did not make sense to me then, and still not now

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I did already before I gave the previous reply, but it did not make sense to me then, and still not now

I miss reread the posts I answered to.

 

[SomeRandom]

Your post reminds me of our friend @PopeADope
He was also good of giving us some history lessons
He was also amazing in providing wonderful pictures

Ahh I miss Pope. Hope he’s doing okay

 

[PruePhillip]

What I don't understand is why someone would want to migrate to a western country if they revile western culture?

Because Christian society gives better outcomes. Once these societies become Islamic
you are back to riding on donkeys again.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

Does the Prime Minister of Pakistan have a reputation for being violent?

He's not beating people on the streets, no.
I'm not sure what you're suggesting. Surely you don't think political leaders are above scrutiny, do you?
My only point was that him talking about the blasphemy of Charlie Hedbo is hypocritical given what happens in his own country on a far more extreme level.

 

[Tambourine]

He's not beating people on the streets, no.
I'm not sure what you're suggesting. Surely you don't think political leaders are above scrutiny, do you?
My only point was that him talking about the blasphemy of Charlie Hedbo is hypocritical given what happens in his own country on a far more extreme level.

So we shouldn't only condemn the violent Muslims.

 

[Father Heathen]

Because Christian society gives better outcomes. Once these societies become Islamic
you are back to riding on donkeys again.

Ignoring the fact that most western, 1st world nations are secular.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

So we shouldn't only condemn the violent Muslims.

Ah...quite.
I meant more that there are certain Muslims who believe violence in the name of Allah is ok. They may conduct the violence or condone it. I'd condemn them, although that's not really different to other religions.

In more general terms, Muslims...and Muslim politicians...should be subject to the same scrutiny as anyone else.

If 'condemn' is as mild as calling out hypocrisy, or suggesting someone has the credibility of a turnip, then we're all subject to condemnation.

Still, you're right. It's not as clear as 'people who are violent in the name of Islam'. That's a little too literal.