Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
watered down cash.....saw one of those hyperinflated reichmarks from the early 20th century...not sure of the date, but it was worth millions of marks on the face of it, but they only printed one side to save printing costs....good grief manjust this morning I was watching a YouTube about the Fed printing too much money
perhaps a thread of it's own is worthwhile
if too much money is printed
Hyper inflation follows
your dollar is reduced
and so too your freedom
Your bank wouldn't charge you a fee to deposit or withdraw cash on a business account? Surprising.as a former merchant i had to pay fees to get paid through E-means....
not so with fungible assets or legal tender,
There's no requirement in the US - at least at the federal level - for businesses to accept cash in payment for retail goods.which by the way has printed on it that it is good for settling debts, the basis of legal tender......it covers the bill....zeros out he account..settled closed...
There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person, or an organization must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether to accept cash unless there is a state law which says otherwise.
Cash also has costs and also has its failures.right now,no third party, no extra time or processing step....and no additional fees for using that costly mechanism to settle a simple debt.... and no inadequate connection mechanism prone to errors and failures.
[edit- probably why they say cash is king]
well, let's hope that optimism covers you when the phone lines aren't working, yet again@MNoBody
An example of the costs and risks associated with cash:
Before stores regularly took debit cards, I worked in retail at a big department store.
At the end of every day, one of the salespeople would have the job of bringing the day's cash and receipts from each till down to the cash room. One pouch per cash register.
One day, one of the salespeople - not me, luckily - brought the cash down, but a pouch was missing. 4 pouches left the department but only 3 made it to the cash room.
They never really figured out whether it was theft or if he just dropped it, but either way, several thousand dollars disappeared. You don't get these sorts of problems if you don't use cash.
Of course e-payment is convenient. If it wasn't, people wouldn't use it. And as long as the costs to handle cash are higher than the costs of e-payment it makes commercial sense.Your bank wouldn't charge you a fee to deposit or withdraw cash on a business account? Surprising.
And the costs with cash aren't just about bank transaction fees. There's also costs due to employee theft (or just innocently making mistakes when making change) as well as the cost of security measures to guard against theft. There's also the time and effort involved in taking cash to the bank, and securely storing it until you do.
A retail business doesn't have to get that large before you need a cash room and to hire an armored car service. At that point, the expense of cash is ridiculous.
(Of course, these costs are largely driven by what insurers require to insure a business. If your business was small enough or under-the-table enough, maybe you didn't see the need to insure yourself)
There's no requirement in the US - at least at the federal level - for businesses to accept cash in payment for retail goods.
Apparently, if you have a debt with someone, your creditor is obliged to accept cash in payment, but a business doesn't have to agree to extend you credit to buy something. If they have a product you want to buy, you only have cash, and they don't want to take cash for it, they don't have to sell it to you unless your state law requires it.
The Fed - Is it legal for a business in the United States to refuse cash as a form of payment?
Cash also has costs and also has its failures.
Of course e-payment is convenient. If it wasn't, people wouldn't use it. And as long as the costs to handle cash are higher than the costs of e-payment it makes commercial sense.
The problem comes when people lose the ability to fall back on cash when e-payment gets more expensive. When cash is no longer an option, there is nothing to stop the banks from extracting ridiculous fees.
... nothing besides market forces, you mean. Banks aren't monopolies.The problem comes when people lose the ability to fall back on cash when e-payment gets more expensive. When cash is no longer an option, there is nothing to stop the banks from extracting ridiculous fees.
True, but banks are also low competition (I wouldn't say they are oligopolies but the entry threshold is high and if one comes up with a method to extract more money the others usually follow).... nothing besides market forces, you mean. Banks aren't monopolies.
just caught eye of a report......
many places are to reopen while not accepting cash
and laws are being passed to stop that trend
seems more the 6% of America does NOT have bank accounts
the term is ...unbanked
about 14million people
@Quagmire : The above wasn't meant to be funny. See:I could imagine to live in a moneyless society but the moment our government stops printing and minting money, I start to print my own.