Ellen Brown
Well-Known Member
It is said that he will be the new Prime Minister of the UK. I don't know a thing about him other than that he looks like a clown to me. Can someone from the UK fill me in?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You could easily read up on his background for various standard sources and I can only give my knowingly biased opinion. I’ve very much not a fan of the man. He’d be entertaining at a party but I don’t want him to be actually responsible for anything important.It is said that he will be the new Prime Minister of the UK. I don't know a thing about him other than that he looks like a clown to me. Can someone from the UK fill me in?
You do not rise to a high position in the best college at Oxford University if you are a slouch.
You could easily read up on his background for various standard sources and I can only give my knowingly biased opinion. I’ve very much not a fan of the man. He’d be entertaining at a party but I don’t want him to be actually responsible for anything important.
Johnston is an old-school upper class, highly educated (not the same as intelligent) Conservative politician with lots of show but limited substance. His early career was in journalism (with a couple of controversies which bring his honesty in question) before he became a career politician, as an MP, government minister and Mayor of London. He’s achieve some things in those offices (though it’s always hard to know whether the individual or the team behind them are doing the actual work) but has also caught himself up in several controversies and questionable decisions, some quite serious.
In general terms he’s manage to avoid binding himself to any specific political lean and seems to intentionally leave his politics open, having shifted position on various key issues, notably including Brexit. His regular comparisons with Trump are valid IMO, but he doesn’t have the same aggression or malice (at least in public). My main difficulty with him is that he has always presented an image as a bumbling fool who doesn’t really know what’s going on. That suggests to me that he either is a bumbling fool or he has been putting up an entirely manufactured image for his entire public career, which would make him a pathological liar and fraud. I’m not happy with the idea of either trait in our Prime Minister. Unfortunately, lots of people don’t appear to care about that and are won over by his fluffy image.
I think there is a fallacy in there somewhere - as to ability versus popularity?
I’m no huge fan of May but I don’t buy that accusation at all. She headed the negotiation of a perfectly viable Brexit deal with the EU which could have been implemented already if only our MPs hadn’t played so much stupid partisan politics with it, blocking it because it wasn’t exactly the outcome they each wanted (or in a few notable cases, because blocking Brexit at that point gave them a chance of becoming PM, a plan that worked for one ).You could not find a better example of a pathological liar than our last Prime Minister.
Even though she was and still is a Remainer, we gave her the benefit of the doubt and she kicked us in the teeth.
How is a pole of Conservative party faithful indicative of the country as a whole, its just not!!
I’m no huge fan of May but I don’t buy that accusation at all. She headed the negotiation of a perfectly viable Brexit deal with the EU which could have been implemented already if only our MPs hadn’t played so much stupid partisan politics with it, blocking it because it wasn’t exactly the outcome they each wanted (or in a few notable cases, because blocking Brexit at that point gave them a chance of becoming PM, a plan that worked for one ).
May’s deal was far from perfect (though I can’t conceive of one – including and form of remaining in the EU - that would be) and she didn’t handle that political mess very well at all but I do believe she honestly worked to get a form of Brexit through and move on, something more and more British people are ultimately calling for – just agree on something already and get it done either way. I suspect that is something Johnston will now play on.
Who told you that? Do you mean the literal definition of vassal state or is that just political rhetoric (i.e. a lie )?Mrs May’s deal was not a deal, it was a treaty that would have enslaved the UK as a vassal state
I never said she didn’t. Political (and political operatives) lie all the time. That is entirely different to manufacturing a fake public image for the good of a political career and managing to maintaining it for several decades. That isn’t simply choosing to speak and untruth, that’s wilfully throwing yourself down the rabbit hole.and she lied to us on many occasions.
Parliament voted down the idea of “no deal” so her hands were largely tied. Threatening something everyone knows you can’t do isn’t a rational negotiation tactic. Even without that, such a cold threat wouldn’t necessarily be the best way to achieve a reasonable deal and could lead the Europeans to be more aggressive in pushing their preferences in response. Just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should.She kept telling us that no deal was better than a bad deal but she never mentioned no deal directly to the EU.
Boris has the popularity of 66% versus 34%. This is quite a margin and another indicator of what the nation thinks about Brexit.
Boris has the popularity of 66% versus 34%. This is quite a margin and another indicator of what the nation thinks about Brexit.