Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Wrong thread Solon. this ones about pagan/christian crossover.Solon said:Where are these Roman records ? Apart from a fleeting reference to Christians in Joshepus, and I think one in the Annals of Tacitus, there are no Roman records which mention Jesus of Nazerath. So, your sources please .
Solon
Taking upon pagan religion traditions is nothing new. The Catholic Church did it with Halloween. But what is widely misunderstood by many [Protestants in my experience] is that taking upon pagan traditions is only wrong when it contradicts current Catholic teaching. To say truth ONLY comes from Christianity is absolutely ignorant to say. So it would be unjust for Catholicism not to embrace the truths that exist in other faiths.Draka said:Okay, now for the post that I'm sure will tick off many people. Having seen this discussion in more than just this thread, one thing has kept coming to my mind. Christianity WANTED to take on Pagan traditions. This goes way back. There were people who already had religion, religious traditions, religious holidays. The Church was adament about conversion. Anyone who defied the Church's beliefs were deemed heretics. They were serious about turning everyone not only Christian, but subservient to the power of the Church. What better way to aid conversion of people than to simply take the holidays and traditions they already have and incorporate them into "Christian" things? This makes the changing over from one religion to another easier. You can keep doing the things you are doing...but with another meaning to what you are doing.
Thus you have the basis of today's traditions.
I don't think the catholic church decided what would be in the new testament, they came a little bit later. Don't confuse 'a' church with 'the' church which is all who believe in Jesus. Jesus was great, and did preach peace and love, he was, and taught a little more than that, though. He taught that we must believe in him, that his death was payment enough for all our sins. We must not ignore this part of his teachings, for it was his main reason to come to earth, so that we may live because of his death.SnaleSpace said:Very true, NetDoc! If I believed that everything in the bible was the teaching of Christ (or the Father) I would be a Christian. Unfortunately I'm very untrusting of humans, and the Catholic Church (who are the people who decided what went in the New Testament) more than most. Jesus, son of God or not, was a great man that according to Roman records of the time lived in Judea and preached peace and love.
Truly a good man be he Mortal or Deity.
You meant to post it here. Don't worry about it.Solon said:ooooh, darn my socks, this week has been rubbish....Help, if somebody can move this to where it was I was posting it, which was.Errr, I don't know now.
In response to SnaleSpace's:Where are these Roman records ? Apart from a fleeting reference to Christians in Joshepus, and I think one in the Annals of Tacitus, there are no Roman records which mention Jesus of Nazerath. So, your sources please .
So yes, you meant to post that here. But the discussion might be for another thread.Jesus, son of God or not, was a great man that according to Roman records of the time lived in Judea and preached peace and love.
An excellent point. I'm wary of any religion that says that truth can be found only within itself. There are so many truths- in Catholicism, in Buddhism, in most religions- that one can learn from and be able to celebrate!Victor said:To say truth ONLY comes from Christianity is absolutely ignorant to say. So it would be unjust for Catholicism not to embrace the truths that exist in other faiths.
Hey Victor, I'm not the best on canonisation, but when did the Catholic church canonise what was in the bible? I think it was arounbd 400AD or something similar?joeboonda said:I don't think the catholic church decided what would be in the new testament, they came a little bit later. Don't confuse 'a' church with 'the' church which is all who believe in Jesus. Jesus was great, and did preach peace and love, he was, and taught a little more than that, though. He taught that we must believe in him, that his death was payment enough for all our sins. We must not ignore this part of his teachings, for it was his main reason to come to earth, so that we may live because of his death.
Sincerely,
Joeboonda
As much as I enjoy Jesus and his works, I'm starting to wonder about something. Did he teach that one should try to cooperate with the rules of the place one is in? Specifically rule 19?joeboonda said:We must not ignore this part of his teachings, for it was his main reason to come to earth, so that we may live because of his death.
Ah, cool, well yes maybe somwhere else, although many threads start to run off at tangent, where links end up, nobody knowsDraka said:You meant to post it here. Don't worry about it.
You said:
In response to SnaleSpace's:
So yes, you meant to post that here. But the discussion might be for another thread.
FFH said:Is this a fair thing to do? Is this not confusing to the minds of young adults and young children, not to mention adults? I was very confused as a child. I did not even know what I was celebrating at times. So many misconceptions and conflicting stories of the origins of holidays in America. It is confusing to say the least. What are we celebrating during Christmas? The blending of two religions? Paganism and Christianity? I know the obvious answers. I would like to dive deaper into this.
Yes we should cooperate, I am not TRYING to break a rule, I just was saying that Jesus also taught that was why He came, sorry to offend.FeathersinHair said:As much as I enjoy Jesus and his works, I'm starting to wonder about something. Did he teach that one should try to cooperate with the rules of the place one is in? Specifically rule 19?