Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Actually, Black Holes is a hard core porn flick from the 80's
Any other questions? I have lots of answers.
Tom
No, no and no - in that order.a little more than another thread.....
Can God create a black hole so deep He can't get out of it?
Can a black hole be.....the bottomless pit?
and wasn't the primordial singularity.....such an item?
ok....so starting at the beginning....No, no and no - in that order.
A black hole is actually the incredibly dense remnant of a dead star that, being incredibly dense, has an incredibly strong gravitational effect on its surroundings. Matter and energy get sucked in never to be seen or heard of again. I suppose it is possible that God will one day fall into a black hole - that will be the same day that all believers fall into a black hole and neither they, nor God are ever heard of again.
The primordial singularity probably never existed - though I guess it is remotely possible that the current universe was the result of the catastrophic collapse of a previous one which might very well have resembled a hyper-massive black hole. If that's the case, then God somehow got out of that one. So maybe the universe is destined to misunderstand its own origins for eternity.
Yes it is - its the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional sphere - perhaps.but that is not what we see when we look up
I was speaking of the spins and rotationsYes it is - its the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional sphere - perhaps.
Ah! Yes there are mysteries yet to be explained - anistropy in the CMWB radiation, asymmetry in terms of matter and anti-matter - and I dunno - spin and rotation? Perhaps that too. None of this is satisfactorily explained by an actual singularity - which by definition would be infinitely ordered and, presumably, symmetrical. But if it had been like that, notwithstanding that there would have been no matter after a few Planck times - as all the matter and anti-matter would have annihilated each other, there certainly would have been no galaxies - all the matter would have dispersed evenly and not clumped together - no clumping together of matter, no gravity (to speak of). No gravity, no spin and rotation...I suppose.I was speaking of the spins and rotations
the expansion would be a single pulse.....if not for rotation BEFORE the 'bang'
your first paragraph speaks of the void....it was perfectAh! Yes there are mysteries yet to be explained - anistropy in the CMWB radiation, asymmetry in terms of matter and anti-matter - and I dunno - spin and rotation? Perhaps that too. None of this is satisfactorily explained by an actual singularity - which by definition would be infinitely ordered and, presumably, symmetrical. But if it had been like that, notwithstanding that there would have been no matter after a few Planck times - as all the matter and anti-matter would have annihilated each other, there certainly would have been no galaxies - all the matter would have dispersed evenly and not clumped together - no clumping together of matter, no gravity (to speak of). No gravity, no spin and rotation...I suppose.
But all that mystery goes away if it was something (rather than nothing) that banged. Then the asymmetry and anisotropy might be a function of whatever the universe was before it became the universe at the Big Bang. But we still wouldn't know what it was because what it became erased the evidence in the process of becoming, i.e. the Big Bang event wiped the rap sheet clean and we will probably never find out what (or who) caused it.
No - it speaks of the kind of universe that would have emerged from a perfectly uniform singularity exploding into a a perfectly uniform void. But, to use your own words, "that is not what we see when we look up"your first paragraph speaks of the void....it was perfect
uniform without form
confusion?...let me try again...No - it speaks of the kind of universe that would have emerged from a perfectly uniform singularity exploding into a a perfectly uniform void. But, to use your own words, "that is not what we see when we look up"
This is a silly argument that any freshman in philosophy can recognize as irrational.a little more than another thread.....
Can God create a black hole so deep He can't get out of it?
Can a black hole be.....the bottomless pit?
and wasn't the primordial singularity.....such an item?
This is a silly argument that any freshman in philosophy can recognize as irrational.
God can only do what is logically coherent. Rocks so heavy he can't lift them, married bachelors, square circles, and black holes so deep God can't get out of them are logically incoherent and so are not actualize-able.
Also there is no such thing as a natural infinite either.
a little more than another thread.....
Can God create a black hole so deep He can't get out of it?
Can a black hole be.....the bottomless pit?
and wasn't the primordial singularity.....such an item?
I am not exactly sure what you described, but I will take your word for it.No more than there is a wardrobe for a hermaphroditic transvestite.
Why?the rotation MUST be in play BEFORE the substance is turned loose
yeah....I posed the op with the answer in itThis is a silly argument that any freshman in philosophy can recognize as irrational.
God can only do what is logically coherent. Rocks so heavy he can't lift them, married bachelors, square circles, and black holes so deep God can't get out of them are logically incoherent and so are not actualize-able.
Also there is no such thing as a natural infinite either.