Other than, you know, the reasons I listed and you hand-waved away.
You cited only a pattern that you see.
But to claim with certainty that what can fit into a pattern
is therefore part of the pattern is inadequate. Moreover,
I pointed out the white candidates subject to birtherism.
Do you deny they exist?
You havent so far. But keep trying! Eventually you'll get it, I'm sure.
Your pattern is imagined because you look only at black
candidates, & entirely ignore the white ones.
I didnt claim it did. Are you done misinterpreting me now?
Are you now claiming that what Trump said is
not racist?
What it demonstrates is that it is possible to be racist, flagrantly racist, and be in denial.
OK.
I don't think you deny that all racism everywhere exists. I think you deny it in ways where it counts.
Well, I think you're too eager to see it.
I didn't claim that either. Man, keep it going Rev! All these amazing straw men you're knocking down, look at you, impressive sir!
I'm doing my best to infer your intent.
Other than, you know, the evidence I cited.
Your evidence is weak, & ignores data,
eg, birtherism applied to white candidates.
We'll agree to disagree about that.
You edited that at the end, after I'd replied. Those examples are quite old, from a time when there were many fewer black people in positions of power or elected office. So obviously, not terribly relevant to the current political context.
You think that Ted Cruz is a "quite old" example?
It is bogus to rule out
every white candidate
subject to birtherism.
You, on the other hand, ignored the obviously relevant question I asked about McCain, the most recent example.
You dismissed his having been subjected to birtherism
by asking questions. I answered them.