joe1776
Well-Known Member
It's an unfortunate fact that all else being equal, the competitor who can cheat and get away with it, will always win the game....
No billionaires got there without unethical exploitation. It's a part of the process.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It's an unfortunate fact that all else being equal, the competitor who can cheat and get away with it, will always win the game....
No billionaires got there without unethical exploitation. It's a part of the process.
I agree. It's a good reason to at least try and re-balance the game, close loopholes, and enforce stricter penalties for cheating.It's an unfortunate fact that all else being equal, the competitor who can cheat and get away with it, will always win the game.
I'm not a Christian, nor am I rich. I'm one of those impoverished "sponges" you insulted. Now why don't you address your blatant transgressions of your deity's teachings? Don't you fear being thrown into the hellfire alongside the rich you adore?So, have you sold everything you own? Oh, that's right, you don't believe so it does not apply to you.
I have no idea. With some wisdom applied, anyone (at any age) wouldn't 'need' more than 10 million, I would think.Really. I am pretty sure we can figure it out.
Is there some upper limit to how much money
anyone should have? Why? How much?
100 million is grotesquely larger than what anyone
could possible "need".
2.5 million seems like more than plenty for an
elderly gentleman.
So what next, once "need" is established?
That's why strong government is needed - as a check on criminals.It's an unfortunate fact that all else being equal, the competitor who can cheat and get away with it, will always win the game.
I'm not in the mood for red herrings. Your hypothetical doesnt reflect the reality we're talking about.
No human ever earned a billion dollars.
No human warrants being entrusted with that much power and possibility.
No human needs or deserves that much excessive wealth.
No human should be allowed to accumulate that much wealth.
I have no idea. With some wisdom applied, anyone (at any age) wouldn't 'need' more than 10 million, I would think.
No human could possibly produce anything equal to a billion dollars in value.Since another declines to answer, what do you mean
by "earn"?
How is money "earned"?
I was thinking more of a young couple starting out with no job security. They could easily in comfort for the rest of their lives. Buy real estate and rent it out, for example. Depends on who and how we're defining need.Lets say someone has ten million dollars, as many do.
What do you think they are doing with it? (this is under
the heading of "need".)
No human could possibly produce anything equal to a billion dollars in value.
Produce a product or provide a service that you can trade to others for money. No human can produce a product or provide a service that is worth a billion dollars. And no humans does. The only way a human can gain that much wealth is by trading parasitically on the products and services being produced by others.So you say. Tho obviously wrong-
but never mind that for now.
Could you just say how money is earned?
Illustrate with a example of two?
Like, say, "Grow potato, sell potato."
I was thinking more of a young couple starting out with no job security. They could easily in comfort for the rest of their lives. Buy real estate and rent it out, for example. Depends on who and how we're defining need.
So for me personally, even at age 20, need would be far less than 10 million. But I grew up in poverty. So there is some variances ... location, psychological needs, etc.
Some folks convince themselves they 'need' stuff they don't ...
expensive cars, fancy houses, holidays, better clothing, gambling, booze, smokes, you name it.
Produce a product or provide a service that you can trade to others for money. No human can produce a product or provide a service that is worth a billion dollars. And no humans does. The only way a human can gain that much wealth is by trading parasitically on the products and services being produced by others.
I did not gr ow up in poverty, but I like you see no
need for fancy stuff. Well, a little bit.
But, you know.
Now, how about someone who wishes to do something
other than engage in self indulgence?
Lets say they see an opportunity to build some
housing units in a fast growing community.
The need money in order to do that, do they not?
People with a lot of money generally work very hard.
That is why they have the money! And those who
inherit but do not work hard tend to see it evaporate.
The money does not just sit about, it goes out and works.
And it does things that a lot of people with a little money
cannot do. Spread money out evenly and only government
can undertake big projects.
This is simply untrue. We live in an economic system that rewards excess wealth with more excess wealth. Everything in the system is designed to give the advantage (control of commerce) to the capital investor, who by definition is a person with more wealth than he needs to live on. And the system does not care at all how one gains that excess wealth, it will give them the control advantage, regardless.People with a lot of money generally work very hard.
That is why they have the money! And those who
inherit but do not work hard tend to see it evaporate.
Money does no "work". People work. Money only enables people to do work. Investing money in the labor of others is parasitical. The investor is not doing any work, nor is he producing any product or service. He is simply using his excess wealth to gain a profit off the work of others.The money does not just sit about, it goes out and works.
Spread the money out more evenly and we wouldn't need the capitalist parasites to enable production.And it does things that a lot of people with a little money
cannot do. Spread money out evenly and only government
can undertake big projects.
You don't necessarily need money to build apartments. What you need is the ability to convince a lender that it's viable. There are also co-operatives. Most really big money is either old money or lucky money.
This is simply untrue. We live in an economic system that rewards excess wealth with more excess wealth. Everything in the system is designed to give the advantage (control of commerce) to the capital investor, who by definition is a person with more wealth than he needs to live on. And the system does not care at all how one gains that excess wealth, it will give them the control advantage, regardless.
Money does no "work". People work. Money only enables people to do work. Investing money in the labor of others is parasitical. The investor is not doing any work, nor is he producing any product or service. He is simply using his excess wealth to gain a profit off the work of others.
Spread the money out more evenly and we wouldn't need the capitalist parasites to enable production.