Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
M.T.
True!It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
M.T.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
M.T.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
M.T.
I believe the quote is:
"Faith is believing what you know ain't so." - Mark Twain
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
M.T.
In a modern world, we are going through a long and complex process of mixing cultures and traditions, so everything can be accepted or questioned. Everything can be wrong if you look from a different prospective. Relativization of everything leads to possibility to be sure or unsure, based on your interest, emotions, walks of life, etc. So, you are right, we can't know things for sure. So, I guess most of us go "from station to station" (D.B.) and that is our reality.When did we start knowing things for sure? Who is "you?"
What you don't know could certainly get you in trouble, but you can't be hurt in a way like when your are fraud from your best friend or something like that...Knowledge is power, the more you know the more powerful you become, the less you know the more wimpy you are, so it's not true that what you don't know doesn't get you into trouble.
If you know a lot, then you won't be easily tricked. Again I emphasize: knowledge is power.What you don't know could certainly get you in trouble, but you can't be hurt in a way like when your are fraud from your best friend or something like that...
In a modern world, we are going through a long and complex process of mixing cultures and traditions, so everything can be accepted or questioned. Everything can be wrong if you look from a different prospective. Relativization of everything leads to possibility to be sure or unsure, based on your interest, emotions, walks of life, etc. So, you are right, we can't know things for sure. So, I guess most of us go "from station to station" (D.B.) and that is our reality.
I agree with you, knowledge is power.If you know a lot, then you won't be easily tricked. Again I emphasize: knowledge is power.
I disagree with you on the part where a truly religious person should have blind faith in his/her religion. I don't believe that religion should be immune from criticism and I think that a religious person should not just accept everything that his/her religion teaches but should view them with a skeptical eye. A person should believe in a religion because of some personal conviction, not because he/she is forced to accept some sort of dogma.I agree with you, knowledge is power.
If you are truly religious person, then you should have blind faith in myths and dogmas, and you are emotionally connected to your religion from the center of your heart.
Once, I lost my religion and I felt so alone and deceived that I believe I would always be sad.
Religious criticism is not a real criticism. It is usually a debate about certain interpretation.I disagree with you on the part where a truly religious person should have blind faith in his/her religion. I don't believe that religion should be immune from criticism and I think that a religious person should not just accept everything that his/her religion teaches but should view them with a skeptical eye. A person should believe in a religion because of some personal conviction, not because he/she is forced to accept some sort of dogma.
Yes, and both quotes use: you-know-ain't-soBoth quotes are attributed to Twain.
No religions do not require blind faith. It is perfectly viable for a person to be believe in a certain religion because of facts not because of blind faith. Also, what I'm talking about is not about differences of interpretation or religions mocking other religions, what I'm talking about is about a certain person really questioning the basis of his/her faith. If a muslim for example decides to criticize The Prophet Muhammad PBUH for instance than I think that should be allowed.Religious criticism is not a real criticism. It is usually a debate about certain interpretation.
Religions usually criticize each other. Religions require blind faith, in opposite, you are not good believer.
" You" is a byproduct of brain activity ...When did we start knowing things for sure? Who is "you?"