Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And to think that that list does not even begin to have all the different Bibles...
So whose interpretation of the Bible do you prefer?I believe the Bible is God's Word.
Or it could just be fiction.It's hard to translate an ancient language, especially one's with what I call 'word-pictures', like Greek and Hebrew, into English. Hence, the reason why there are so many different English translations. Everyone thinks they can do it better than the other guy. If you are only using English versions, and are dedicated to just one at that, I think it's fair to say that it would be very difficult to try and understand exactly what the Bible is saying, without having at least a working understanding of ancient Greek and Hebrew. And, on top of that, the fact that the Bible, particularly the Old Testament, is full of metaphor, hyperbole, allegory, poetry, and the like, makes it that much more difficult to try and pinpoint exactly what meaning the Bible is trying to convey.
If the global flood story is true, it is quite odd that as Noah's descendants
repopulated the world, the ones who moved far away did not leave any surviving records about a man named Noah, and the mountains of Ararat. It is well-known that stories can easily be transmitted verbally over many centuries, and later be written down. Surely a story as important as the flood story would have survived, and would have been recorded many times. The same goes for the story of the Ten Plagues in Egypt. If such extraordinary events were true, they surely would have been recorded
The story of the flood is perhaps the one story that is found in many cultures around the world. It is also a prominent story in Hindu religion.
it clearly shows the sumerian version and noahs are close and the rest have differences
I am a firm believer that the Bible is the inerrant word of God. I am a Christian, that is what I believe.
such as?
- man is "evil"
- earth is flooded
- very few survivors, usually "good"
again, and again, and again... ?!
yeah, there are variations, there are drastically different versions (in one the bad guys kinda get away with it, getting everyone else killed, heh), but I find the amount of stories that follow that exact same pattern much too astonishing to dismiss it with a simple "there are differences". of course they are, and yay for them! when jews wrote "god spoke to noah", the hopi might have said "noah opened the door at the top of his head"
Institute for Creation Research?
What a waste.
and having myths written by others where a deity is mad and floods his people is normal as well as a man in a boat who has morals is normal for any culture that gets flooded by a regional flood
peru? really? heh.
and I see what you did there
I think the important thing to take away is the moral lessons for man to be good
sadly its lost when debating with hard line theist because with the literal interpretation the allegory simply has vanished.
then pay attention lol and learn because its just simple history
it's not about a deity who "floods his people", it's about a deity that utterly kills everybody, the whole world, and only a local hero from their people survives.
Now if you have some other brilliant idea or hypthesis please share
That's something that has always interested me, is that the Christians who are so busy trying to prove the literal interpretation of the flood story are completely missing the point of the story.