• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Biden Hire's Racist Who Teaches Blacks are "Superior" to Whites

Thief

Rogue Theologian
the Hodge Twins......for Trump

if you haven't seen these guys......you're not educated
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
and let's not forget to have opinion by someone who understands IQ

Jordan Peterson

see......IQ and the workplace
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Absolutely.

Much will be clarified by what she does or doesn't say.

It needs to be very firmly renounced.
For one-
"White" people are not the only ones low on
malanin,

Some half way excuse won't do.

Next, see how Biden deals with it,
if she doesn't renounce it 100%
Perhaps she's grown since then....adding Asians to her inferiority list.

Just joking!
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Everyone who makes that comparison thinks it legit (it isn't).

Not on every detail.

No freaking analogy or comparison ever is,
and its tiresome to point that out.

The detail of innate genetic superiority of
one race is central to nazi ideology.

Its an entirely valid comparison.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Well, many liberals have adopted the
old "one drop rule" as newly progressive.

See E. Warren.

Or that so called Karen of the "black kid stole
phone" story who says she can't be racist,
the which of why being a Hispanic ancestor
somewhere.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Didn't I provide reasons for that. If the main supporter and originator of the theory are racists organisations and individuals, wouldn't the nativism of the conspiracy theory, already a tangent of racism, take on a further racist character?

Defense of the deeply racist organisations and individuals destroys credibility on matter too.
Fascinating.
This rationale says that anything a racist says is therefore racist.
The label you apply determines intent behind all utterances, eh.

The problem with that line of thought is that it only works
in an echo chamber, ie, reinforcing existing prejudices.
Won't sway anyone else....it just looks like empty demonization.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Well, many liberals have adopted the
old "one drop rule" as newly progressive.
well then....I must be a gushing Spaniard
in spite of my name sake and my whitey dad

btw.....if namesake in more important......
and if my blood line was a bit more so....

my family crest would have six pointed star on it
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
See E. Warren.

Or that so called Karen of the "black kid stole
phone" story who says she can't be racist,
the which of why being a Hispanic ancestor
somewhere.
You've forgotten that in the Zimmerman v Martin
shooting, liberals invented the term, "white Hispanic".
Perhaps someday you'll become a "white Asian",
thereby being toppled from your pedestal (the those
people can't be racist status).
 

epronovost

Well-Known Member
Fascinating.
This rationale says that anything a racist says is therefore racist.
The label you apply determines intent behind all utterances, eh.

No, idiot. When a racist person says something nativist, which is a tangent of racism, to a person of a racialised group, that tangent gains in strength and it's reasonnable to assume one feeds the other.

That's how we prove intent in a court of law by the way.

The problem with that line of thought is that it only works
in an echo chamber, ie, reinforcing existing prejudices.
Won't sway anyone else....it just looks like empty demonization.

So when David Duke defended birtherism, didn't you think that maybe, the fact he is profoundl racist might have informed his opinion and attachment to this "conspiracy theory" or was Duke purely rationnal and Obama's race never came into question? How about Arpaio and Trump, the two keystone leaders of the birther movement? Both were also known before for their racism. It was the same thing for the white christian identity movement which were the strongest adherrant to the theory.

You would have a stronger point if you could find a famous example of a person or organisation that was decidedly not marred in prior incidence of racism that supported Obama's birther conspiracy theory.
 
Last edited:

epronovost

Well-Known Member
You've forgotten that in the Zimmerman v Martin
shooting, liberals invented the term, "white Hispanic".
.

I'm sorry to tell you the term "white hispanic" (or a close equivalent to be more precise) was invented by the Spanish in the 16th century when they started to classify the population into a system of racial caste in 17 categories. It's a fairly common distinction in South and Central America. I suppose it would be the same in ancient Spanish possession in the Southern US like Florida.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
You've forgotten that in the Zimmerman v Martin
shooting, liberals invented the term, "white Hispanic".
Perhaps someday you'll become a "white Asian",
thereby being toppled from your pedestal (the those
people can't be racist status).

I could be spotted on campus as an
" international" student, umbrella open
under a blue sky.

If melanin-phobe makes me white and
automatically, irretrievably racist, no
pedestal for me.

In the event, unlike the pc crowd,
I don't pretend I've no racial prejudice.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
I'm sorry to tell you the term "white hispanic" was invented by the Spanish in the 16th century when they started to classify the population into a system of racial caste in 17 categories.
oooooo......I would like a thread on this
 

epronovost

Well-Known Member
oooooo......I would like a thread on this

Here let's look at a painting that could be titled "50 shades of racism", but is actually called Casta (or caste in english to describe the name and racial castes in effect in colonial Mexico). Some of the terms down bellow are still in usage today. The 17th category would be Espagniol (Spaniard) which was the term to describe what is reffered in the US as a "white hispanic". All the people bellow were, linguisticly speaking, hispanic

800px-Casta_painting_all.jpg
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
well then....I must be a gushing Spaniard
in spite of my name sake and my whitey dad

btw.....if namesake in more important......
and if my blood line was a bit more so....

my family crest would have six pointed star on it
Go ahead...claim it...you're entitled.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
No, idiot. When a racist person says something nativist, which is a tangent of racism, to a person of a racialised group, that tangent gains in strength and it's reasonnable to assume one feeds the other.

That's how we prove intent in a court of law by the way.
I'm an idiot?
I'm not the one using a tautology, ie, rationalizing
the accusation of racism based solely upon your
labelling the person racist.

You'd better calm down. Language like
that will attract mods with yardsticks.
We don't want the thread locked.
 
Top