Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Perhaps she's grown since then....adding Asians to her inferiority list.Absolutely.
Much will be clarified by what she does or doesn't say.
It needs to be very firmly renounced.
For one-
"White" people are not the only ones low on
malanin,
Some half way excuse won't do.
Next, see how Biden deals with it,
if she doesn't renounce it 100%
Well, many liberals have adopted theand is Kamala Harris really.....black?
Everyone who makes that comparison thinks it legit (it isn't).
Asians are plainly on the list.Perhaps she's grown since then....adding Asians to her inferiority list.
Just joking!
Well, many liberals have adopted the
old "one drop rule" as newly progressive.
Fascinating.Didn't I provide reasons for that. If the main supporter and originator of the theory are racists organisations and individuals, wouldn't the nativism of the conspiracy theory, already a tangent of racism, take on a further racist character?
Defense of the deeply racist organisations and individuals destroys credibility on matter too.
well then....I must be a gushing SpaniardWell, many liberals have adopted the
old "one drop rule" as newly progressive.
You've forgotten that in the Zimmerman v MartinSee E. Warren.
Or that so called Karen of the "black kid stole
phone" story who says she can't be racist,
the which of why being a Hispanic ancestor
somewhere.
Fascinating.
This rationale says that anything a racist says is therefore racist.
The label you apply determines intent behind all utterances, eh.
The problem with that line of thought is that it only works
in an echo chamber, ie, reinforcing existing prejudices.
Won't sway anyone else....it just looks like empty demonization.
Sure.Are there humans, who are racist, but don't understand that in their own view of themselves?
You've forgotten that in the Zimmerman v Martin
shooting, liberals invented the term, "white Hispanic".
.
You've forgotten that in the Zimmerman v Martin
shooting, liberals invented the term, "white Hispanic".
Perhaps someday you'll become a "white Asian",
thereby being toppled from your pedestal (the those
people can't be racist status).
oooooo......I would like a thread on thisI'm sorry to tell you the term "white hispanic" was invented by the Spanish in the 16th century when they started to classify the population into a system of racial caste in 17 categories.
oooooo......I would like a thread on this
Go ahead...claim it...you're entitled.well then....I must be a gushing Spaniard
in spite of my name sake and my whitey dad
btw.....if namesake in more important......
and if my blood line was a bit more so....
my family crest would have six pointed star on it
I'm an idiot?No, idiot. When a racist person says something nativist, which is a tangent of racism, to a person of a racialised group, that tangent gains in strength and it's reasonnable to assume one feeds the other.
That's how we prove intent in a court of law by the way.