Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Ah. I read the mislabeled article. It would be much more accurate to title it….
I think there should be accommodations to those who would like to apply legally. An inprocessing center available prior to arrival.
No, you only injected your opinion....tough tittyAh. I read the mislabeled article. It would be much more accurate to title it….
“Conservative-Biased Supreme Court Forces US to continue with Trump’s callous and inhumane ‘Remain in Mexico’ Border Policy (as Biden administration Heroically Battles to end the terrible Trump program, and return the US to its Great Old Status as a Bastion of Human Rights)”
There. Fixed. You’re welcome!
Edit: Oh yeah. Thanks for the info!
Not hardley. The laws are the laws no matter what bleeding heart liberals assume.
Try reading your own article.
So, you’re saying the laws in favor of slavery and no women voting should have stayed?
Try reading your own article.
Not my opinion, it’s the point of the article.
BTW - your argumentative style is lacking.
And now the SCOTUS stands in the way of useful reform.
That seems high. His handling of everything is a disaster.
It is a truism that absolutely nobody politically, whether they be Democrat or Republican, supports illegal immigrants coming into the United States. However if you really want to know who benefits and likes illegal immigrants coming into the United States, then you would be better off asking the owners of large farms throughout the country, as well as construction companies throughout the country who can utilize large numbers of untrained labor. Of course this would include those companies of our former POTUS.
And if you’re caught? No problem! At least for the US business. Fire and deport, wait a week, then hire new desperate laborers. Yay! People are desperate and will pay whatever cost it takes to get their children (and themselves) into what they perceive as a better life….and criminals will exploit that.it’s more a matter of what’s not to like? Cheap labor, who are easily intimidated, because when they cause you problems you fire them and have them deported. Transactions often are made in cash under the table with no taxes to deal with and no healthcare benefits. As an employer you can also completely ignore worker complaints about dangerous working conditions. Bonus!
As for all of the crimes and criminal syndicates that arise among the desperate refugees scrambling to get into the relatively safer United States of America; running away from whatever atrocities they fled from…. That unfortunately comes down to a standard ‘supply and demand’ issue.
Are you saying the criminal Cartels are justified (a kind of necessary evil)? Why are they necessary?
Does that make you happy?
Sure does
I knew that you and the bigoted old man currently occupying the White House could agree on something.
Obviously, Biden and his administration support illegal immigrants coming into the U.S. by their actions despite saying words to the contrary. Do you think otherwise?
Well said. Some people argue that illegal immigrants are better because they commit less crime and turn a blind eye to why that is.
An interesting point of view, but legal exception already exists for people who would suffer unduly in Mexico. Moreover, bringing them into the U.S. has actually empowered the Cartels that exploit them - the opposite of the claimed benefit.
Yes, the vast majority of asylum seekers do not have a valid asylum claim. Are you arguing that those rejected actually do have a valid asylum claim simply because they didn't migrate from Mexico? Are you aware that most Haitians weren't fleeing their homeland, but instead wanted to resettle from other countries besides Haiti that they had already migrated to and settled in? Are you also aware that Remain in Mexico would've allowed Haitians to have their cases reviewed without shipping them back to Haiti (the place that they were ostensibly fleeing from)? Why would Biden support shipping them back to Haiti, but not support having them stay in Mexico while their cases are reviewed?
Feel free to give answers to those questions.
You said that 35% of people are in favor immigration (legal or illegal), but then stated that no one politically supports illegal immigration.
Do you think that there is any case to be made in support of illegal immigration (other than what you've already put forth)?
If I understand correctly, the argument so far that illegal immigration is good is as follows:
- Illegal immigrants are exploitable as cheap labor that can be denied basic rights (a form of slavery).
- Some (?) illegal immigrants somehow have a legitimate asylum claim despite being rejected when their case is thoroughly reviewed by experts.
- Many of them are not from Mexico implies that many (?) of them aren't going to the U.S. for employment purposes (?) and are, instead, refugees with legitimate (?) asylum claims.
- Mexico is too dangerous a place for anyone to wait while an asylum claim is reviewed. Only the U.S. can be considered safe from criminal organizations.
But in the current situation of uncontrolled illegal immigration, the drawbacks of child abuse, sexual assault, murder, drugs, human trafficking, and empowered criminal organizations are... acceptable tradeoffs? So for example, it is okay for tens of thousands of U.S. citizens to die every year from fentanyl because many more thousands of exploitable cheap laborers will be imported.
Whaaaat? How, exactly, does bringing people out of Mexico and into the US, allow the Mexican cartels to exploit these people more? Please give examples. I had not known that aspect. However, it appears that the US is in fact working on getting the originally Haitian people back to where they had been recently, assuming that they had resident status in those other nations. Get used to reality. Clearly your statements about cartels, abuse, murders, etc…indicate that you agree; as would most sane people. Please rephrase.
