• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Bible verses about Jerusalem as Woman

sooda

Veteran Member
Bible verses about Jerusalem as Woman
(From Forerunner Commentary)

Lamentations 1:1-7

The symbol begins as a city. The city is obviously Jerusalem, and it is portrayed as a widow.

Then Jerusalem is depicted as a princess whose friends have deceived her. Her lovers have rejected her, and she has become a slave. However, the symbol that represents the city is still female. It has gone from widow to princess.

In verse 3, Jerusalem next morphs into Judah the nation. Judah is clearly twice referenced as "she" in the middle of the verse.

Jerusalem and Judah are then referenced as "Zion," and in verses 4, 5, and 6, is again referred to as "her." In verse 6, Jerusalem becomes the daughter of Zion, whose beauty has faded and is counterpoised with male princes who are of no help to her. In verse 7, we return full circle to Jerusalem, and again it is referenced as "her" five times, and as "she" once. Clearly, a woman symbolizes a city, and the city, its nation.

Each one of these female symbols is depicting the same thing—Jerusalem and Judah—but from slightly different perspectives.

But within the context, it is not depicting a church. Is there any parallel with the church here in Lamentations? Yes, but it is indirect, and at best vague and secondary. Israel is never referred to as a church in the Old Testament. Why? Because there was no church.

It is not until the New Testament that the Bible suggests that a woman symbolizes a church, and that symbol is restricted to the "Israel of God" (Galatians 6:16), which is important in reference to Revelation 17. Thus, when we understand Revelation 17, Babylon (the great woman, the harlot) cannot be the church under any circumstance.



John W. Ritenbaugh
Where Is the Beast? (Part 4)



Lamentations 1:1-7



Here, even before the woman symbol appears, the city is identified as female by feminine pronouns. It is more specifically designated as a widow, another female figure. Before the verse ends, it reflects back on an earlier time when she was a princess, another female figure, but now she is a slave.

In verse 3, the city morphs into Judah, the nation. Then in verse 4, an alternate name for Jerusalem, Zion, is used, and the female identity continues. In verse 6, the city becomes "the daughter of Zion." It is not until verse 7 that Jerusalem, the woman described throughout this context, is directly named. If one would read further, we would see that people have seen her nakedness, and her sin was in her skirts, referring to sins of idolatry, which God describes in sexual terms.

The New King James version uses feminine pronouns 28 times in those seven verses in reference to the entity variously called "a city," "Judah," "a widow," "the princess," "Zion, "the daughter of Zion," and "Jerusalem."

Undoubtedly, a woman symbolizes a city, and city, a nation. Each of the female symbols depicts the same thing, Jerusalem and Judah, but from slightly different perspectives. Within this context, it is not depicting a church. Is there a parallel to the church in Lamentations? Yes, but it is indirect, imprecise, and at best secondary.

Jerusalem as Woman (Forerunner Commentary)



John W. Ritenbaugh
The Beast and Babylon (Part Four): Where Is the Woman of Revelation 17?
 

sooda

Veteran Member
Characteristics of the Woman of Revelation 17

The apostle John writes in Revelation 17:5-7:

And on her forehead a name was written: MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. And I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus. And when I saw her, I marveled with great amazement. But the angel said to me, "Why did you marvel? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns."

It is interesting that God labels this Woman a "mystery." Is her identity the mystery, or is it her character?

Is she a nation or a church of old that resurfaces as an influential power in the end time? We are not left to guess because the angel says, "I will show you the mystery of the woman and of the beast." Revelation 17 and 18 contain many clues to the identification of the Woman.

Vine's Expository Dictionary defines "mystery" (Strong's #3466) as that which denotes, not the mysterious (as with the Eng[lish] word), but that which, being outside the range of unassisted natural apprehension, can be made known only by divine revelation, and is made known in a manner and at a time appointed by God, and to those only who are illumined by His Spirit.

Speaking of the same period as Revelation 17, Daniel 12:10 parallels the need for divine revelation: "Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand."

Elsewhere, the wise are defined as those who keep the commandments, so we trust that we are the wise, and God will make this mystery known to us.

In Revelation 18:7, three of this mystery Woman's remarkable characteristics are named, which will help to identify her: "In the measure that she glorified herself and lived luxuriously, in the same measure give her torment and sorrow; for she says in her heart, 'I sit as a queen, and am no widow, and will not see sorrow.'"

"She has glorified herself" implies pride, even to the point of arrogance. Jeremiah 51:41 adds an interesting assessment of why Babylon may have this haughty attitude: "Oh, how Sheshach is taken! Oh, how the praise of the whole earth is seized! How Babylon has become desolate among the nations!"

Having the admiration of the nations is enough to turn the head of all but the most sound-minded of people, and Babylon is not of this quality.

Revelation 18:7 then says of her, "she lived luxuriously," or as other translations suggest "extravagantly," "lustfully," or "unrestrainedly."

The terms suggest the very apex of luxury, indicating satiety, an overindulgent superabundance, a state of having too much. She indulges herself in a surfeit of things to pamper her flesh and stimulate the vanity of her mind.

Finally, the verse peers into the depths of her thoughts about herself. What she thinks of herself magnifies the other qualities: "I sit as a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow."

She sees herself as above the masses of people struggling to get by. She directs her life to avoid suffering. She displays an in-your-face, "let them eat cake," haughty superiority. We should realize, however, that the avoidance of suffering inevitably produces compromise with law and conscience.

Thus, we have a nation portrayed as proud to the point of arrogance and self-confident in its security, thinking it has produced its power by its own means. It lives extravagantly relative to the levels of the rest of the world, and it seeks immediate gratification. It fails to discipline itself as it compromises with known standards.

Notice how this description parallels one of Jerusalem in Ezekiel 16:48-51:

"As I live," says the Lord God, "neither your sister Sodom nor her daughters have done as you and your daughters have done. Look, this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: She and her daughter had pride, fullness of food, and abundance of idleness; neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty and committed abomination before Me; therefore I took them away as I saw fit.

Samaria did not commit half of your sins; but you have multiplied your abominations more than they, and have justified your sisters by all the abominations which you have done."

Incredible but true because God's Word is true. Jerusalem, by God's judgment, was worse than either Sodom or Samaria!
 

Tumah

Veteran Member
I just want to point out that the word "city" in Hebrew is a feminine noun. So attached verbs and pronouns will naturally be feminine as well. I'm not trying to say there's no metaphor there. Just that it appears to be coming from the gender of the noun.

I also believe that the difference between "Zion" and "daughter of Zion" is that Zion refers to the city (often as a metaphor for the nation) and "daughter of Zion" refers to the people of Zion. "Daughter of X-city/country" is a commonly found expression in Tanach (eg. Isa.23:10,12, Jer. 4:11, Psa. 137:9). I found a few verses where Zion is mentioned together with Jerusalem and where the daughter of Zion is mentioned together with the daughter of Jerusalem. But I didn't find any which had one and one*. So I believe they do have slightly different connotations.


*Except Isa. 4:4, however over there it's possible to understand that the filth is from the nation and the blood is what was spilled in the city.
 

sooda

Veteran Member
I just want to point out that the word "city" in Hebrew is a feminine noun. So attached verbs and pronouns will naturally be feminine as well. I'm not trying to say there's no metaphor there. Just that it appears to be coming from the gender of the noun.

I also believe that the difference between "Zion" and "daughter of Zion" is that Zion refers to the city (often as a metaphor for the nation) and "daughter of Zion" refers to the people of Zion. "Daughter of X-city/country" is a commonly found expression in Tanach (eg. Isa.23:10,12, Jer. 4:11, Psa. 137:9). I found a few verses where Zion is mentioned together with Jerusalem and where the daughter of Zion is mentioned together with the daughter of Jerusalem. But I didn't find any which had one and one*. So I believe they do have slightly different connotations.


*Except Isa. 4:4, however over there it's possible to understand that the filth is from the nation and the blood is what was spilled in the city.

That makes a lot of sense.. Thanks.
 
Top