Jim
Nets of Wonder
Yes, I can see the danger in that, a false gospel. In fact, I think that is largely what has happened. False gospels substituting in the place of the real thing.You seem to want to give some validity to following Jesus teachings while rejecting Who He is. I am not going to do that. That is almost akin to getting a vaccine. You get enough to keep you from the real thing. I think it is a dangerous route.
I was trying to find something to say that you would agree with, but now it will be just to see if I can explain what I’m thinking well enough for a person to understand it who believes in the Bible as history in the same way you do.
With people who don’t believe in the Bible as history in the same way you do, or who have doubts about it, one of the ways that they might learn to believe in it and accept Jesus as Lord and Savior might be from their experience in trying to understand and practice what He says about how to live our lives. I see the danger that you’re pointing out of people substituting Jesus as a spiritual teacher in the place of the true gospel, but even so, it might not always be that for everyone. Sometimes following Jesus as a spiritual teacher might lead them to the true gospel. I know that we’re disagreeing about what the true gospel is, but whatever it is, sometimes following Jesus as a spiritual teacher might lead a person to it.
For information, even though we disagree about what the true gospel is, I think that any gospel without God in Jesus at its heart and center is not the gospel of Jesus.