Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
He will be 78 in 2020. Does he have a chance to run a good race?
Did you perhaps happen to miss the fact that this would cost less than continuing as is?Bernie wants taxpayer funding for all of everybody's medical bills, which would cost an estimated $32 trillion dollars over the time span of just one decade. This amount of spending would require federal taxes to be doubled or otherwise bankrupt this nation. Of course, nobody in his/her right mind would ever want anything like this to happen.
Since when has reality have to do with anything in regards to politics?!!!!! Why the fiscally conservative party in power managed to have a one time give away $1.5 trillion in taxes and run up the largest monthly debt in history just this last month! And so bernie whats to be crazy with money like suddenly people actually care? I dont see it anywhere at all unless its going into their pocket then they care.Bernie wants taxpayer funding for all of everybody's medical bills, which would cost an estimated $32 trillion dollars over the time span of just one decade. This amount of spending would require federal taxes to be doubled or otherwise bankrupt this nation. Of course, nobody in his/her right mind would ever want anything like this to happen.
Did you perhaps happen to miss the fact that this would cost less than continuing as is?
So, the independent expert analysis is wrong? That's interesting, tell me more.If the government were to pay all of everybody's medical bills, this will prompt people going to the doctors when they have very minor ailments that'd heal without medical intervention. Also, without insured cost sharing, screenings or tests will be ordered by health care providers just to bilk the taxpayers. Furthermore, there would be a shortage of health care providers to meet the excessive demands of Bernie's Medicare for All. Now that you are aware of how Bernie's Medicare for All won't end up saving costs, and now that you are aware of the health care provider shortages Bernie's Medicare for All would cause, we have good reason to oppose that radical socialist Bernie Sanders for President.
Since when has reality have to do with anything in regards to politics?!!!!! Why the fiscally conservative party in power managed to have a one time give away $1.5 trillion in taxes and run up the largest monthly debt in history just this last month! And so bernie whats to be crazy with money like suddenly people actually care? I dont see it anywhere at all unless its going into their pocket then they care.
So, the independent expert analysis is wrong? That's interesting, tell me more.
I think he is too old.
Maybe he's too old to understand communism has failed everywhere it's been? ...
When did Bernie become a communist? I thought he was a Democratic Socialist.
Here: PERI - Economic Analysis of Medicare for AllCould you please cite the independent expert analysis that shows Bernie's Medicare for All would be less costly than even just simply following the status quo of private health insurance, out of pocket patient paid health care, medicare, or medicaid?
Actually, “Medicare for All” would increase administrative costs by at least $12.5 billion per year.
Medicare-For-All Would Increase, Not Save, Administrative Costs
Perhaps you can write a response for the consideration of the authors. The contact details are at the bottom of the page. Good luck.This economic analysis fails to consider the cost of health care provider shortages and those medical service providers who'd bilk the system when there is no insured cost sharing deterrent against insurance fraud.