Flat Earth Kyle
Well-Known Member
Was there ever a time when God existed as a singular being surrounded by absolute nothingness?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Was there ever a time when God existed as a singular being surrounded by absolute nothingness?
Was there ever a time when God existed as a singular being surrounded by absolute nothingness?
Was there ever a time when God existed as a singular being surrounded by absolute nothingness?
That would be pantheism/panentheism. And if there ever was a time when God existed as a singular being surrounded by absolute nothingness and "created" the universe then the universe would either have to have been created from nothing or from herself.God is infinite and eternal. She has and will always exist as a singular being. She is everything, everyone, everywhere, every moment, in short God is all there is. It is impossible for anything to exist outside of God. Nothingness does not surround God, but is an apect her her being and essence; as is everything else, including you, me, everyone and all.
Separation from all there is, is an illusion we cannot yet reconcile with, but ironically,without it we we could not exist and experience ourselves as something 'other than'
That would be pantheism/panentheism. And if there ever was a time when God existed as a singular being surrounded by absolute nothingness and "created" the universe then the universe would either have to have been created from nothing or from herself.
Was there ever a time when God existed as a singular being surrounded by absolute nothingness?
I just copied ben_jamin23. ben_jamin23 says "her".ArtieE,
It seems to me that your philosophrasting, is extreme dereism. This is unless you can point to, at least ONE place in the Holy Scriptures that even hint at the idea that Jehovah God is female
Have you ever read the scriptures where God, Himself says that He is a man, Ex 15:3, Deut 6:15-17. Before you can prove anything, your premises must be on a sound foundation. Where is one place in the Holy Scriptures that says that Joejovah is female, or one place where a female adjective is used for HIM???
I just copied ben_jamin23. ben_jamin23 says "her".
""G-d has no body, no genitalia, therefore the very idea that G-d is male or female is patently absurd..
That would be pantheism/panentheism. And if there ever was a time when God existed as a singular being surrounded by absolute nothingness and "created" the universe then the universe would either have to have been created from nothing or from herself.
'Panentheist' was.
You're joking right? Go back to my post number 9 and read the quote and follow the link.Well you are factually wrong.
Do you have any evidence of this?
I do, I have evidence he was male, not only that he was the father of himself if you want to follow the mythology back far enough.
LOL!Everyone is entitled to personal faith.
Trying to prove this faith by unsubstantiated claims, is where your getting into trouble.
Not only that, your now perverting someone else's mythology by calling their god a female
"As onerabbi explained it to me, G-d has no body, no genitalia, therefore the very idea that G-d is male or female is patently absurd.
"The Catechism of the Catholic Church #239 specifically states that "God is neither man nor woman: he is God".[16][17]" Gender of God - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Aren't Catholics men then?You need to look at the origins of the Israelite gods. El and Yahweh. early on Yahweh was defined as man, as a son, as being married, and having genitals.
But your severe ignorance of how gods are defined by man
You're joking right? Go back to my post number 9 and read the quote and follow the link.
"The Catechism of the Catholic Church #239 specifically states that "God is neither man nor woman: he is God".[16][17]" Gender of God - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Aren't Catholics men then?