• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Atheism, Theism, Pantheism, Agnosticism, Deism test.

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
Atheism / Secular Humanism (100%)


Deism (83%)


Agnosticism (66%)


Idealist Pantheism (61%)


Naturalistic Pantheism (60%)


Dualist Pantheism (58%)


Panentheism (40%)


Literal Paganism / New Age / Animism (37%)


Regular Monotheism (35%)
 

RubyEyes

Truth Seeker
Sort of. Reality (the territory) doesn't depend on an observer, but our individual and cultural understanding and perception of it (the maps we draw) definitely does. Different maps of the territory have distinct strengths and weaknesses and I never like to claim the map is the territory. Dualism is definitely a useful map, and I have to know how to use that map because it is so pervasive in my culture. It's just not a map I prefer to use in my own practice as it doesn't reflect my experience of the territory (reality) very well. :D
Hm well. I was saying it because dualist/monist is about what you believe it actually is like. However you are right, I think that most of the time maps are our only access to the territory, we can't know the territory as-it-is. But even with these limitations, I would justify my belief in dualism as an extrapolation of our own body/mind internal experience to the territory or external world.
 

Penumbra

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Atheism / Secular Humanism (100%)
Naturalistic Pantheism (87%)
Deism (76%)
Panentheism (76%)
Agnosticism (74%)
Regular Monotheism (70%)
Idealist Pantheism (67%)
Dualist Pantheism (66%)
Literal Paganism / New Age /Animism (46%)
 

ChristineES

Tiggerism
Premium Member
Regular Monotheism (100%)
ir
Panentheism (96%)
ir
Dualist Pantheism (76%)
Deism (68%)
ir
Idealist Pantheism (64%)
ir
Literal Paganism / New Age / Animism (64%)
ir
Agnosticism (44%)
ir

Naturalistic Pantheism (40%)

It's what I expected, although I am surprised that although I am 100% Monotheist, I am also 96% Panentheism. I am having hard time understanding Panentheism, too. :)
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic ☿
Premium Member
Agnosticism (100%)

Dualist Pantheism (90%)

Literal Paganism / New Age / Animism (90%)

Naturalistic Pantheism (79%)

Idealist Pantheism (76%)

Panentheism (76%)

Deism (75%)

Atheism / Secular Humanism (55%)

Regular Monotheism (54%)
 
Last edited:

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
New results:


Idealist Pantheism (100%)


Regular Monotheism (100%)


Agnosticism (75%)


Deism (75%)


Literal Paganism / New Age / Animism (62%)


Panentheism (50%)


Atheism / Secular Humanism (37%)


Dualist Pantheism (25%)


Naturalistic Pantheism (25%)
 

mycorrhiza

Well-Known Member
Isn't dualism and pantheism an oxymoron?

Not that oxymorons don't exist...

I wouldn't say that it is. It would simply mean that the Universe itself is the only thing that exists, but that it has two properties: physical and spiritual, allowing for such things as reincarnation.
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic ☿
Premium Member
Isn't dualism and pantheism an oxymoron?

Not that oxymorons don't exist...
From what I'm gathering from these classifications for this quiz:

Naturalistic pantheism: Matter is real, spirit is illusion
Idealistic pantheism: Spirit is real, matter is illusion
Dualist pantheism: Both matter and spirit are real

...and are stances on how you see the universe. I could be misinterpreting, however, so it gives me an excuse for further investigation. (as if I really need an excuse) :p
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
I wouldn't say that it is. It would simply mean that the Universe itself is the only thing that exists, but that it has two properties: physical and spiritual, allowing for such things as reincarnation.
Allowing for two substances...
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Surprising. I would have sword it would come out as pure atheism.

Naturalistic Pantheism (100%)


Agnosticism (95%)


Atheism / Secular Humanism (93%)


Idealist Pantheism (87%)


Dualist Pantheism (83%)


Panentheism (71%)


Deism (66%)


Regular Monotheism (63%)


Literal Paganism / New Age / Animism (50%)
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Do you mean that pantheism must contain only one substance?
As I understand it, yes, god is that substance. Pantheism is the idea that nothing exists that is not god. The term was coined in the 1700's by John Tolland to identify an image of the world that contrasts with both idealism (thought is the substance of the world) and materialism.

...pantheistic belief arises when the things of this world excite a particular sort of religious reaction in us. We feel, perhaps, a deep reverence for and sense of identity with the world in which we find ourselves. Epistemically it seems to us that God is not distant but can be encountered directly in what we experience around us. We see God in everything. The initial focus of attention here may be either our physical environment (the land on which we live, our natural environment) or else our social environment (our community, our tribe, our nation or, generally, the people we meet with) but further reflection may lead to its more universal expansion.
In the second kind of argument, reasoning starts from a relatively abstract concept whose application is taken as assured, but further reflection leads to the conclusion that its scope must be extended to include the whole of reality. Most typically, the concept in question is that of ‘God’, or ‘perfect being’, in which case pantheism appears as the logical terminus or completion of theism...
Pantheism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
 

The_Evelyonian

Old-School Member
[FONT=helvetica,Arial]Atheism / Secular Humanism (100%) [/FONT]:fsm:[FONT=helvetica,Arial]

[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Naturalistic Pantheism (95%)[/FONT]

[FONT=helvetica,Arial]Agnosticism (80%)

[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Deism (75%)

[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Dualist Pantheism (70%)

[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Idealist Pantheism (70%)

Panentheism (65%)

[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Regular Monotheism (60%)

[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Literal Paganism / New Age / Animism (55%)[/FONT]
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Atheism / Secular Humanism (100%)
Naturalistic Pantheism (96%)
Agnosticism
(75%)
Dualist Pantheism (67%)
Idealist Pantheism (67%)
Deism (59%)
Panentheism (48%)
Literal Paganism / New Age / Animism (45%)
Regular Monotheism
(38%)
 

SageTree

Spiritual Friend
Premium Member
Dualist Pantheism (100%)
Literal Paganism / New Age / Animism (98%)
Naturalistic Pantheism (86%)
Agnosticism (82%)
Idealist Pantheism (76%)
Deism (68%)
Panentheism (62%)
Regular Monotheism (53%)
Atheism / Secular Humanism (52%)
 

Badran

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Agnosticism (100%)
Atheism / Secular Humanism (100%)
Naturalistic Pantheism (100%)
Deism (80%)
Dualist Pantheism (80%)
Idealist Pantheism (80%)
Panentheism (80%)
Literal Paganism / New Age / Animism (70%)
Regular Monotheism (70%)
 

Tarheeler

Argumentative Curmudgeon
Premium Member
[FONT=helvetica,Arial]Regular Monotheism (100%)
[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Deism (94%)[/FONT]
[FONT=helvetica,Arial]Agnosticism (82%)
[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Panentheism (82%)
[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Dualist Pantheism (76%)
[/FONT]
[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial][FONT=helvetica,Arial][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Literal Paganism / New Age / Animism (76%)
[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Idealist Pantheism (70%)
[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Atheism / Secular Humanism (64%)
[/FONT][FONT=helvetica,Arial]Naturalistic Pantheism (52%)[/FONT]
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic ☿
Premium Member
mycorrhiza said:
Do you mean that pantheism must contain only one substance?
As I understand it, yes, god is that substance. Pantheism is the idea that nothing exists that is not god. The term was coined in the 1700's by John Tolland to identify an image of the world that contrasts with both idealism (thought is the substance of the world) and materialism.
It's an interactive universe.
 

mycorrhiza

Well-Known Member
As I understand it, yes, god is that substance. Pantheism is the idea that nothing exists that is not god. The term was coined in the 1700's by John Tolland to identify an image of the world that contrasts with both idealism (thought is the substance of the world) and materialism.

I would say that God/The Universe could very well have two substances. They're both God/The Universe, giving us a single substance (God), but they're also distinctly different, giving us two substances (Spirit and Matter).

It's like Jesus in mainstream Christianity; he's both physical and spiritual, but still God.

The meaning of Pantheism has expanded as it has branched off into many different sub-categories. If we're going by the definition by John Tolland you posted, then neither naturalistic nor idealistic pantheism would be pantheism either.
 
Top